Effectiveness of three-dimensional printed cardiac models in teaching congenital heart anatomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Anatomical Sciences Education Pub Date : 2026-10-10 Epub Date: 2026-06-26 DOI:10.1002/ase.70293
Gabriel Antônio Ferreira Alves, Antônio da Silva Menezes Júnior
{"title":"Effectiveness of three-dimensional printed cardiac models in teaching congenital heart anatomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Gabriel Antônio Ferreira Alves,&nbsp;Antônio da Silva Menezes Júnior","doi":"10.1002/ase.70293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Congenital heart disease challenges spatial understanding. 3D printed cardiac models are increasingly used, but randomized quantitative evidence remains limited. This review and meta-analysis evaluated their effectiveness for teaching congenital heart anatomy. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through November 12, 2025. RCTs comparing 3D-printed cardiac models with conventional instruction were included. The primary outcome was objective knowledge performance. SMDs were pooled using random-effects REML models. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and the certainty of evidence evaluated with GRADE. Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria; five RCTs (<i>n</i> = 228 participants) contributed data to the primary meta-analysis. The use of 3D-printed cardiac models significantly improved objective post-intervention knowledge performance compared with conventional instructional methods (SMD = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.21–1.02; <i>p</i> = 0.003; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 53.2%), corresponding to a moderate effect size according to Cohen's conventional interpretation. Because of the small number of eligible trials, subgroup analyses were not interpreted as confirmatory, and subjective educational outcomes were summarized cautiously rather than used to support the primary conclusion. The certainty of evidence for objective knowledge performance was rated as moderate using the GRADE approach, mainly due to risk-of-bias concerns and imprecision. The use of 3D-printed cardiac models was associated with moderate improvements in objective learning of congenital heart anatomy compared with conventional teaching approaches. However, the small evidence base, methodological limitations, and short-term nature of most assessments support a cautious interpretation. These models may be considered adjunctive educational tools, but larger randomized trials using standardized outcomes and longitudinal follow-up are needed.</p><p>\n \n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"19 10","pages":"1697-1708"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.70293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Congenital heart disease challenges spatial understanding. 3D printed cardiac models are increasingly used, but randomized quantitative evidence remains limited. This review and meta-analysis evaluated their effectiveness for teaching congenital heart anatomy. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through November 12, 2025. RCTs comparing 3D-printed cardiac models with conventional instruction were included. The primary outcome was objective knowledge performance. SMDs were pooled using random-effects REML models. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and the certainty of evidence evaluated with GRADE. Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria; five RCTs (n = 228 participants) contributed data to the primary meta-analysis. The use of 3D-printed cardiac models significantly improved objective post-intervention knowledge performance compared with conventional instructional methods (SMD = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.21–1.02; p = 0.003; I2 = 53.2%), corresponding to a moderate effect size according to Cohen's conventional interpretation. Because of the small number of eligible trials, subgroup analyses were not interpreted as confirmatory, and subjective educational outcomes were summarized cautiously rather than used to support the primary conclusion. The certainty of evidence for objective knowledge performance was rated as moderate using the GRADE approach, mainly due to risk-of-bias concerns and imprecision. The use of 3D-printed cardiac models was associated with moderate improvements in objective learning of congenital heart anatomy compared with conventional teaching approaches. However, the small evidence base, methodological limitations, and short-term nature of most assessments support a cautious interpretation. These models may be considered adjunctive educational tools, but larger randomized trials using standardized outcomes and longitudinal follow-up are needed.

三维打印心脏模型在先天性心脏解剖教学中的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
先天性心脏病挑战空间理解能力。3D打印心脏模型的使用越来越多,但随机定量证据仍然有限。本综述和荟萃分析评估了它们在先天性心脏解剖学教学中的有效性。PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science的检索截止日期为2025年11月12日。纳入比较3d打印心脏模型与常规指导的随机对照试验。主要结果为客观知识表现。采用随机效应REML模型对smd进行汇总。偏倚风险用RoB 2评估,证据确定性用GRADE评估。6项rct符合纳入标准;5个随机对照试验(n = 228名受试者)为主要荟萃分析提供了数据。与传统教学方法相比,3d打印心脏模型的使用显著提高了客观干预后知识表现(SMD = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.21-1.02; p = 0.003; I2 = 53.2%),根据Cohen的传统解释,对应于中等效应大小。由于符合条件的试验数量较少,亚组分析不能被解释为验证性的,主观教育结果被谨慎地总结,而不是用来支持主要结论。使用GRADE方法,客观知识表现的证据确定性被评为中等,主要是由于偏倚风险问题和不精确。与传统教学方法相比,3d打印心脏模型的使用与先天性心脏解剖客观学习的适度改善有关。然而,大多数评估的证据基础小、方法局限性和短期性质支持谨慎的解释。这些模型可能被认为是辅助教育工具,但需要使用标准化结果和纵向随访的更大规模的随机试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书