Risk of adverse effects of the concomitant use of statins with calcium channel blockers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8
Postgraduate medicine Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-25 DOI:10.1080/00325481.2026.2693370
Ilil Maidatuz Zulfa, Hindun Wilda Risni, Ruth Brauer, Cate Whittlesea, Li Wei
{"title":"Risk of adverse effects of the concomitant use of statins with calcium channel blockers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ilil Maidatuz Zulfa, Hindun Wilda Risni, Ruth Brauer, Cate Whittlesea, Li Wei","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2026.2693370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and statins are commonly combined to prevent cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, their concomitant use may lead to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and increased adverse effects (AEs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the evidence of adverse effects (AEs) associated with the calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and statins concomitant use. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL from database inception to 4 April 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting AEs of CCB-statin combinations compared with CCB or statin treatment in adults. Outcomes assessed included CCBs- and statins-associated AEs, treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. Meta-analyses of similar outcomes were performed to estimate pooled Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Of 9,737 articles screened, 20 studies (<i>n</i> = 1,053,198) were included. Peripheral edema, myalgia, and discontinuation were most reported in 11, 7, and 9 studies, respectively. Meta-analyses demonstrated no significant differences in the risk of peripheral edema (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.14-1.48), myalgia (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.63-2.79), or discontinuation (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.50-1.23 for CCB-statin vs. CCB; OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.68-1.38 for CCB-statin vs. statin). However, evidence of other AEs was inconsistent and limited. CCB-statin combination appears generally safe in a short-term use (3 to 6 months). Further research is warranted to clarify the long-term risk of AEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"705-720"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2026.2693370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and statins are commonly combined to prevent cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). However, their concomitant use may lead to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and increased adverse effects (AEs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the evidence of adverse effects (AEs) associated with the calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and statins concomitant use. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL from database inception to 4 April 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting AEs of CCB-statin combinations compared with CCB or statin treatment in adults. Outcomes assessed included CCBs- and statins-associated AEs, treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. Meta-analyses of similar outcomes were performed to estimate pooled Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Of 9,737 articles screened, 20 studies (n = 1,053,198) were included. Peripheral edema, myalgia, and discontinuation were most reported in 11, 7, and 9 studies, respectively. Meta-analyses demonstrated no significant differences in the risk of peripheral edema (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.14-1.48), myalgia (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.63-2.79), or discontinuation (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.50-1.23 for CCB-statin vs. CCB; OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.68-1.38 for CCB-statin vs. statin). However, evidence of other AEs was inconsistent and limited. CCB-statin combination appears generally safe in a short-term use (3 to 6 months). Further research is warranted to clarify the long-term risk of AEs.

他汀类药物与钙通道阻滞剂合用的不良反应风险:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)和他汀类药物通常联合用于预防心血管疾病(cvd)。然而,它们的同时使用可能导致药物-药物相互作用(ddi)和不良反应(ae)的增加。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估与钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)和他汀类药物联合使用相关的不良反应(ae)的证据。我们检索了MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science和CENTRAL从数据库建立到2025年4月4日。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验(rct)和报告CCB-他汀联合治疗与CCB或他汀治疗成人ae的观察性研究。评估的结果包括CCBs和他汀类药物相关的不良事件、停药、住院和全因死亡率。对类似结果进行荟萃分析,以95%置信区间(CI)估计合并优势比(OR)。在筛选的9737篇文章中,纳入了20项研究(n = 1,053,198)。外周水肿、肌痛和停药分别在11项、7项和9项研究中报道最多。meta分析显示外周水肿(OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.14-1.48)、肌痛(OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.63-2.79)或停药(CCB-他汀vs CCB OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.50-1.23; CCB-他汀vs他汀OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.68-1.38)的风险无显著差异。然而,其他ae的证据不一致且有限。ccb -他汀联合用药在短期(3 - 6个月)通常是安全的。需要进一步的研究来阐明不良反应的长期风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书