How Do Similar Thalamocortical Circuits Produce Psychosis Versus Compulsivity?

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Pegah Seif
{"title":"How Do Similar Thalamocortical Circuits Produce Psychosis Versus Compulsivity?","authors":"Pegah Seif","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2026.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The thalamus is now recognized as a dynamic regulator of cortical information flow, with the thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN) providing inhibitory control over the routing, gain, and timing of thalamocortical communication. Schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) both involve thalamocortical abnormalities but produce distinct clinical phenotypes, psychosis versus compulsivity. In this narrative review, we synthesize evidence from neuroimaging, electrophysiology, postmortem studies, and animal models to compare thalamocortical gating mechanisms across these disorders. In schizophrenia, converging evidence supports weakened TRN-mediated inhibition as a core gating deficit. Postmortem reductions in GAD67 and parvalbumin (PV) within TRN neurons, optogenetic models reproducing sensory gating deficits through TRN PV suppression, and a ∼40% reduction in sleep spindle density collectively point to diminished inhibitory regulation of thalamic relay output. At the network level, this maps onto reduced thalamo-prefrontal connectivity with increased thalamo-sensorimotor coupling, consistent with deficient top-down filtering and excessive bottom-up sensory transmission. In OCD, no study has directly examined TRN structure or function. However, cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical models implicate thalamic relay disinhibition through basal ganglia pathways, and emerging evidence of increased spindle frequencies correlating with obsession severity suggests a pattern qualitatively distinct from schizophrenia. These preliminary observations raise the possibility that OCD involves temporally inflexible rather than weakened gating, although this hypothesis remains speculative. Together, these lines of evidence suggest that similar thalamocortical architectures may be disrupted through distinct regulatory mechanisms, i.e., insufficient inhibitory control versus loss of temporal flexibility, thereby offering a framework for understanding how overlapping circuits produce divergent psychiatric phenotypes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54231,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","volume":"11 10","pages":"Pages 1207-1217"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902226001825","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The thalamus is now recognized as a dynamic regulator of cortical information flow, with the thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN) providing inhibitory control over the routing, gain, and timing of thalamocortical communication. Schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) both involve thalamocortical abnormalities but produce distinct clinical phenotypes, psychosis versus compulsivity. In this narrative review, we synthesize evidence from neuroimaging, electrophysiology, postmortem studies, and animal models to compare thalamocortical gating mechanisms across these disorders. In schizophrenia, converging evidence supports weakened TRN-mediated inhibition as a core gating deficit. Postmortem reductions in GAD67 and parvalbumin (PV) within TRN neurons, optogenetic models reproducing sensory gating deficits through TRN PV suppression, and a ∼40% reduction in sleep spindle density collectively point to diminished inhibitory regulation of thalamic relay output. At the network level, this maps onto reduced thalamo-prefrontal connectivity with increased thalamo-sensorimotor coupling, consistent with deficient top-down filtering and excessive bottom-up sensory transmission. In OCD, no study has directly examined TRN structure or function. However, cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical models implicate thalamic relay disinhibition through basal ganglia pathways, and emerging evidence of increased spindle frequencies correlating with obsession severity suggests a pattern qualitatively distinct from schizophrenia. These preliminary observations raise the possibility that OCD involves temporally inflexible rather than weakened gating, although this hypothesis remains speculative. Together, these lines of evidence suggest that similar thalamocortical architectures may be disrupted through distinct regulatory mechanisms, i.e., insufficient inhibitory control versus loss of temporal flexibility, thereby offering a framework for understanding how overlapping circuits produce divergent psychiatric phenotypes.
相似的丘脑皮质回路是如何产生精神病和强迫症的?
丘脑现在被认为是皮质信息流的动态调节器,丘脑网状核(TRN)对丘脑皮质通信的路径、增益和时间提供抑制控制。精神分裂症和强迫症(OCD)都涉及丘脑皮质异常,但产生不同的临床表型,精神病与强迫症。本文综合了来自神经影像学、电生理学、死后研究和动物模型的证据,比较了这些疾病的丘脑皮质门控机制。在精神分裂症中,越来越多的证据支持trn介导的抑制减弱是一种核心门控缺陷。死后TRN神经元内GAD67和小白蛋白的减少,通过TRN小白蛋白(PV)抑制再现感觉门控缺陷的光遗传模型,以及睡眠纺轴密度减少约40%,共同表明丘脑传递输出的抑制调节减弱。在网络层面,这反映了丘脑-前额叶连接减少,丘脑-感觉-运动耦合增加,与自上而下过滤不足和自下而上感觉传递过度一致。在强迫症中,没有研究直接检测TRN的结构或功能。然而,皮质-纹状体-丘脑-皮质(CSTC)模型暗示丘脑通过基底神经节通路解除抑制,新出现的证据表明,纺锤波频率增加与强迫症严重程度相关,这一模式与精神分裂症有质的区别。这些初步的观察结果提出了一种可能性,即强迫症与时间上的不灵活有关,而不是减弱的门控,尽管这种假设仍然是推测性的。总之,这些证据表明,相似的丘脑皮质结构可能通过不同的调节机制、抑制控制不足和时间灵活性的丧失而被破坏,这为理解重叠回路如何产生不同的精神表型提供了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
247
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging is an official journal of the Society for Biological Psychiatry, whose purpose is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in fields that investigate the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders of thought, emotion, or behavior. In accord with this mission, this peer-reviewed, rapid-publication, international journal focuses on studies using the tools and constructs of cognitive neuroscience, including the full range of non-invasive neuroimaging and human extra- and intracranial physiological recording methodologies. It publishes both basic and clinical studies, including those that incorporate genetic data, pharmacological challenges, and computational modeling approaches. The journal publishes novel results of original research which represent an important new lead or significant impact on the field. Reviews and commentaries that focus on topics of current research and interest are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书