Machine learning-based prediction of mortality and hospitalization in diabetic patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the GUARDIAN-P risk score.

IF 4.4 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2026-06-10 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztag083
Zheng-Wei Chen, Jen-Fang Cheng, Chen-Yu Huang, Tin-Tse Lin, Ting-Chuan Wang, Yen-Yun Yang, Shu-Lin Chuang, Chia-Ti Tsai, Lian-Yu Lin, Chung-Lieh Hung, Cho-Kai Wu
{"title":"Machine learning-based prediction of mortality and hospitalization in diabetic patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the GUARDIAN-P risk score.","authors":"Zheng-Wei Chen, Jen-Fang Cheng, Chen-Yu Huang, Tin-Tse Lin, Ting-Chuan Wang, Yen-Yun Yang, Shu-Lin Chuang, Chia-Ti Tsai, Lian-Yu Lin, Chung-Lieh Hung, Cho-Kai Wu","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztag083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major contributor to adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We aim to develop and externally validate a machine learning-based model using a random survival forest (RSF) approach for predicting the composite outcome of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and cardiovascular (CV) death in patients with DM and HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 1450 adult patients with coexisting DM and HFpEF identified from the National Taiwan University Hospital-Integrated Medical Database. An initial RSF model was trained using 27 clinical variables, and the top 9 predictors were selected to construct a parsimonious final model. Predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and external validation was conducted in an independent cohort (<i>n</i> = 729) from MacKay Memorial Hospital. Over a mean follow-up of 3.6 ± 3.0 years, 327 patients (22.6%) experienced the composite outcome. The final RSF model achieved an AUC of 88.2% in the training cohort and 79.8% in the validation cohort. The nine selected predictors were age, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, serum albumin, fasting glucose, estimated glomerular filtration rate, uric acid, left atrial diameter, peripheral artery disease, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Risk increased progressively with the number of risk factors present.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RSF-based model incorporating nine routinely available variables accurately predicts HHF and CV death in patients with DM and HFpEF. This tool may support personalized risk assessment and guide clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"7 6","pages":"ztag083"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13293260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztag083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major contributor to adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We aim to develop and externally validate a machine learning-based model using a random survival forest (RSF) approach for predicting the composite outcome of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and cardiovascular (CV) death in patients with DM and HFpEF.

Methods and results: This retrospective cohort study included 1450 adult patients with coexisting DM and HFpEF identified from the National Taiwan University Hospital-Integrated Medical Database. An initial RSF model was trained using 27 clinical variables, and the top 9 predictors were selected to construct a parsimonious final model. Predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and external validation was conducted in an independent cohort (n = 729) from MacKay Memorial Hospital. Over a mean follow-up of 3.6 ± 3.0 years, 327 patients (22.6%) experienced the composite outcome. The final RSF model achieved an AUC of 88.2% in the training cohort and 79.8% in the validation cohort. The nine selected predictors were age, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, serum albumin, fasting glucose, estimated glomerular filtration rate, uric acid, left atrial diameter, peripheral artery disease, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Risk increased progressively with the number of risk factors present.

Conclusion: The RSF-based model incorporating nine routinely available variables accurately predicts HHF and CV death in patients with DM and HFpEF. This tool may support personalized risk assessment and guide clinical decision-making.

基于机器学习的预测射血分数保留的糖尿病心力衰竭患者的死亡率和住院率:GUARDIAN-P风险评分
目的:糖尿病(DM)是保留射血分数(HFpEF)心力衰竭患者不良结局的主要因素。我们的目标是开发并外部验证一个基于机器学习的模型,该模型使用随机生存森林(RSF)方法来预测糖尿病和HFpEF患者因心力衰竭(HHF)和心血管(CV)死亡住院的综合结果。方法与结果:本回顾性队列研究纳入1450例合并糖尿病和HFpEF的成人患者,这些患者来自台湾大学医院综合医学数据库。使用27个临床变量训练初始RSF模型,并选择前9个预测因子构建简约的最终模型。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估预测效果,并在MacKay Memorial Hospital的独立队列(n = 729)中进行外部验证。在平均3.6±3.0年的随访中,327例患者(22.6%)出现了复合结果。最终的RSF模型在训练队列和验证队列中的AUC分别达到了88.2%和79.8%。选择的9个预测因子是年龄、n端脑利钠肽前体、血清白蛋白、空腹血糖、肾小球滤过率、尿酸、左心房内径、外周动脉疾病和左心室射血分数。风险随着风险因素的增加而逐渐增加。结论:基于rsf的模型包含9个常规可用变量,可准确预测糖尿病和HFpEF患者的HHF和CV死亡。该工具可支持个性化风险评估和指导临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书