Donghyeon Yun, Lauren K Dillard, Lois J Matthews, Judy R Dubno
{"title":"Associations Between Self-Reported Workload and Measures of Speech Recognition in Adults Across the Lifespan.","authors":"Donghyeon Yun, Lauren K Dillard, Lois J Matthews, Judy R Dubno","doi":"10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Listening workload may partially explain variations in speech recognition that speech audibility alone cannot capture, as increased workload can interfere with speech processing. This study aimed to investigate the association between listening workload and speech recognition in a large sample of the general population with varying ages and hearing thresholds.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from 635 participants, from a longitudinal cohort study, who completed a modified version of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) following the Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 (NU-6; <i>n</i> = 635), Speech Perception in Noise test (SPIN; <i>n</i> = 440), and Staggered Spondaic Word test (SSW; <i>n</i> = 455) were included. Adjusted for age, sex, and race, linear regressions models were used to examine associations between self-reported workload, defined by NASA-TLX domains of performance, effort, and frustration, with five outcomes of speech recognition, measured by the NU-6 (both adjusted and unadjusted for audibility), SPIN low-context (both adjusted and unadjusted for audibility), and SSW total percent scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In general, lower levels of self-reported workload were associated with better speech recognition scores, including for audibility-adjusted and non-audibility-adjusted speech recognition tasks and after adjustment for demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that self-reported performance, effort, and frustration ratings were associated with speech recognition in various listening conditions, with influences from reduced speech audibility and demographic factors including age, sex, and race. Thus, self-reported workload may serve as a complementary tool to provide better understanding of listening abilities of individuals with hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32690985.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"983-993"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13549738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-25-00298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Listening workload may partially explain variations in speech recognition that speech audibility alone cannot capture, as increased workload can interfere with speech processing. This study aimed to investigate the association between listening workload and speech recognition in a large sample of the general population with varying ages and hearing thresholds.
Method: Data from 635 participants, from a longitudinal cohort study, who completed a modified version of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) following the Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 (NU-6; n = 635), Speech Perception in Noise test (SPIN; n = 440), and Staggered Spondaic Word test (SSW; n = 455) were included. Adjusted for age, sex, and race, linear regressions models were used to examine associations between self-reported workload, defined by NASA-TLX domains of performance, effort, and frustration, with five outcomes of speech recognition, measured by the NU-6 (both adjusted and unadjusted for audibility), SPIN low-context (both adjusted and unadjusted for audibility), and SSW total percent scores.
Results: In general, lower levels of self-reported workload were associated with better speech recognition scores, including for audibility-adjusted and non-audibility-adjusted speech recognition tasks and after adjustment for demographic factors.
Conclusions: Findings suggest that self-reported performance, effort, and frustration ratings were associated with speech recognition in various listening conditions, with influences from reduced speech audibility and demographic factors including age, sex, and race. Thus, self-reported workload may serve as a complementary tool to provide better understanding of listening abilities of individuals with hearing loss.
目的:听力工作量可能部分解释了语音识别的变化,这些变化仅靠语音可听性无法捕捉,因为增加的工作量会干扰语音处理。本研究旨在调查不同年龄和听力阈值的大样本人群中听力工作量与语音识别之间的关系。方法:635名参与者在完成西北大学第六次听觉测试(NU-6, n = 635)、噪音中的语音感知测试(SPIN, n = 440)和错开自发性单词测试(SSW, n = 455)后完成了美国国家航空航天局任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)的修正版。对年龄、性别和种族进行调整后,使用线性回归模型来检查自我报告的工作量(由NASA-TLX领域的表现、努力和挫折定义)与语音识别的五个结果(由NU-6(调整和未调整可听性)、SPIN低上下文(调整和未调整可听性)和SSW总百分比分数测量)之间的关联。结果:总体而言,自我报告的工作量水平越低,语音识别得分越高,包括对可听性调整和非可听性调整的语音识别任务,以及对人口因素进行调整后的语音识别得分。结论:研究结果表明,在各种听力条件下,自我报告的表现、努力程度和沮丧程度与语音识别有关,并受到语音可听性降低和人口因素(包括年龄、性别和种族)的影响。因此,自我报告的工作量可以作为一种补充工具,以更好地了解听力损失患者的听力能力。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32690985。
期刊介绍:
Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.