Occupational Therapy Group Interventions Within the Area of Time Use and Occupational Balance: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Maria Lönn, Katrin Häggström Westberg, Ann-Caroline Holst, Lena-Karin Erlandsson
{"title":"Occupational Therapy Group Interventions Within the Area of Time Use and Occupational Balance: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Maria Lönn, Katrin Häggström Westberg, Ann-Caroline Holst, Lena-Karin Erlandsson","doi":"10.1155/oti/9972405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Group interventions are one mode of delivery that supports individuals experiencing challenges related to time management and occupational imbalance in their recovery. However, research on available group interventions, their key components, and how to evaluate their potential effects on time use and occupational balance is scarce.</p><p><strong>Aims/objective: </strong>This study is aimed at contributing to the development of evidence-based occupational therapy interventions by describing research that evaluates group interventions for adults within the scope of time use and occupational balance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using four databases. Records published between 2014 and 2024 were identified, and data from the identified group interventions were extracted and summarized. The outcomes and instruments in the different articles were categorized according to Wilson and Cleary's conceptual model of patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one articles describing 13 different group interventions were included. The most commonly addressed measures within the time use and occupational balance domain were value or satisfaction measures (for occupations), performance measures (including aspects such as activity level, performance, and competence), and occupational balance measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lack of consensus regarding outcome measures for occupational therapy group interventions highlights the need to clarify and relate key concepts within the domain of time use and occupational balance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49140,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Therapy International","volume":"2026 1","pages":"e9972405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13305142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Therapy International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/oti/9972405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Group interventions are one mode of delivery that supports individuals experiencing challenges related to time management and occupational imbalance in their recovery. However, research on available group interventions, their key components, and how to evaluate their potential effects on time use and occupational balance is scarce.

Aims/objective: This study is aimed at contributing to the development of evidence-based occupational therapy interventions by describing research that evaluates group interventions for adults within the scope of time use and occupational balance.

Materials and methods: A scoping review was conducted using four databases. Records published between 2014 and 2024 were identified, and data from the identified group interventions were extracted and summarized. The outcomes and instruments in the different articles were categorized according to Wilson and Cleary's conceptual model of patient outcomes.

Results: Thirty-one articles describing 13 different group interventions were included. The most commonly addressed measures within the time use and occupational balance domain were value or satisfaction measures (for occupations), performance measures (including aspects such as activity level, performance, and competence), and occupational balance measures.

Conclusions: The lack of consensus regarding outcome measures for occupational therapy group interventions highlights the need to clarify and relate key concepts within the domain of time use and occupational balance.

在时间使用和职业平衡领域的职业治疗小组干预:范围审查。
简介:团体干预是一种交付模式,支持个人在恢复过程中遇到与时间管理和职业不平衡相关的挑战。然而,关于现有群体干预措施及其关键组成部分,以及如何评估其对时间利用和职业平衡的潜在影响的研究却很少。目的/目的:本研究旨在通过描述在时间使用和职业平衡范围内评估成人群体干预的研究,促进以证据为基础的职业治疗干预的发展。材料和方法:使用四个数据库进行范围审查。对2014年至2024年间发表的记录进行了识别,并对识别出的群体干预措施的数据进行了提取和汇总。不同文章中的结果和工具根据Wilson和Cleary的患者结果概念模型进行分类。结果:纳入了31篇文章,描述了13种不同的群体干预措施。在时间利用和职业平衡领域中,最常用的测量方法是价值或满意度测量(针对职业)、绩效测量(包括活动水平、绩效和能力等方面)和职业平衡测量。结论:关于职业治疗组干预的结果测量缺乏共识,强调了在时间利用和职业平衡领域澄清和联系关键概念的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Occupational Therapy International is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing manuscripts that reflect the practice of occupational therapy throughout the world. Research studies or original concept papers are considered for publication. Priority for publication will be given to research studies that provide recommendations for evidence-based practice and demonstrate the effectiveness of a specific treatment method. Single subject case studies evaluating treatment effectiveness are also encouraged. Other topics that are appropriate for the journal include reliability and validity of clinical instruments, assistive technology, community rehabilitation, cultural comparisons, health promotion and wellness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书