Validity of optical coherence tomography angiography in the differential diagnosis of papilledema and pseudopapilledema

IF 3.1 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Optometry Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2026.100617
Esther Cerdan-Hernandez, María José Palencia-Herranz, Manuel Barón, Josefa Aguado-Martín, Mercedes Leal-González, José Carlos Martín-Rodrigo, Francisco Javier Barriga, Olga Seijas, Elia Pérez-Fernández, Pablo Gili
{"title":"Validity of optical coherence tomography angiography in the differential diagnosis of papilledema and pseudopapilledema","authors":"Esther Cerdan-Hernandez,&nbsp;María José Palencia-Herranz,&nbsp;Manuel Barón,&nbsp;Josefa Aguado-Martín,&nbsp;Mercedes Leal-González,&nbsp;José Carlos Martín-Rodrigo,&nbsp;Francisco Javier Barriga,&nbsp;Olga Seijas,&nbsp;Elia Pérez-Fernández,&nbsp;Pablo Gili","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2026.100617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess the value of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) peripapillary retinal vascularization in differentiating papilledema from pseudopapilledema.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study, prospective recruitment patients diagnosed with papilledema and pseudopapilledema between January 2021 and December 2022. Papilledema: mild-moderate acute optic disc edema due to increased intracranial pressure. Pseudopapilledema: optic nerve drusen and other causes confirmed by multimodal imaging techniques. Mean and sectoral peripapillary flux index and perfusion density were measured using commercial software. Diagnostic performance was analyzed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-five patients (mean age, 36.5 years; 63.1% women) were included: 14 with papilledema (28 eyes; mean age 37.1 years, 9 women) and 51 with pseudopapilledema (95 eyes, mean age 36.4 years, 32 women), with no significant differences in age or gender. Significant differences were found for flux index in the nasal sector (p = 0.034). Mean perfusion density was significantly higher for papilledema (44.377%) than for pseudopapilledema (42.460%) (p = 0.036), as was perfusion in the nasal sector (p = 0.005). Mean vascular flux index had an AUC of 0.683 (95% CI, 0.518–0.848), with 76.9% sensitivity and 58.8% specificity, with a cut-off of 0.461. Mean perfusion had an AUC of 0.665 (95% CI 0.492–0.838), with 53.8% sensitivity and 76.5% specificity, with a cut-off of 44.25%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>OCTA displayed higher peripapillary flux index and perfusion in papilledema than pseudopapilledema in the nasal region. These parameters showed moderate diagnostic accuracy and may serve as adjunctive tools in the differential diagnosis of optic disc swelling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"19 3","pages":"Article 100617"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429626000105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the value of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) peripapillary retinal vascularization in differentiating papilledema from pseudopapilledema.

Methods

A cross-sectional study, prospective recruitment patients diagnosed with papilledema and pseudopapilledema between January 2021 and December 2022. Papilledema: mild-moderate acute optic disc edema due to increased intracranial pressure. Pseudopapilledema: optic nerve drusen and other causes confirmed by multimodal imaging techniques. Mean and sectoral peripapillary flux index and perfusion density were measured using commercial software. Diagnostic performance was analyzed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

Sixty-five patients (mean age, 36.5 years; 63.1% women) were included: 14 with papilledema (28 eyes; mean age 37.1 years, 9 women) and 51 with pseudopapilledema (95 eyes, mean age 36.4 years, 32 women), with no significant differences in age or gender. Significant differences were found for flux index in the nasal sector (p = 0.034). Mean perfusion density was significantly higher for papilledema (44.377%) than for pseudopapilledema (42.460%) (p = 0.036), as was perfusion in the nasal sector (p = 0.005). Mean vascular flux index had an AUC of 0.683 (95% CI, 0.518–0.848), with 76.9% sensitivity and 58.8% specificity, with a cut-off of 0.461. Mean perfusion had an AUC of 0.665 (95% CI 0.492–0.838), with 53.8% sensitivity and 76.5% specificity, with a cut-off of 44.25%.

Conclusions

OCTA displayed higher peripapillary flux index and perfusion in papilledema than pseudopapilledema in the nasal region. These parameters showed moderate diagnostic accuracy and may serve as adjunctive tools in the differential diagnosis of optic disc swelling.
光学相干断层血管造影鉴别诊断乳头状水肿和假性乳头状水肿的有效性。
目的:评价光学相干断层血管成像(OCTA)在鉴别乳头状水肿与假性乳头状水肿中的价值。方法:一项横断面研究,前瞻性招募2021年1月至2022年12月期间诊断为乳头水肿和假性乳头水肿的患者。视神经乳头水肿:由颅内压升高引起的轻中度急性视神经盘水肿。假性脊髓水肿:经多模态成像技术证实的视神经麻痹及其他原因。使用商业软件测量平均和部门乳头周围通量指数和灌注密度。采用受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分析诊断性能。结果:纳入65例患者,平均年龄36.5岁,女性占63.1%,其中乳头水肿14例(28眼,平均年龄37.1岁,女性9例),假性乳头水肿51例(95眼,平均年龄36.4岁,女性32例),年龄和性别无显著差异。鼻部通量指数差异有统计学意义(p = 0.034)。乳头状水肿的平均灌注密度(44.377%)显著高于假乳头状水肿(42.460%)(p = 0.036),鼻段灌注密度(p = 0.005)显著高于假乳头状水肿(42.460%)。平均血管通量指数的AUC为0.683 (95% CI, 0.518-0.848),敏感性76.9%,特异性58.8%,截止值0.461。平均灌注AUC为0.665 (95% CI 0.492-0.838),敏感性53.8%,特异性76.5%,截止值44.25%。结论:OCTA显示鼻区乳头水肿的乳头周围通量指数和灌注高于假乳头水肿。这些参数具有中等的诊断准确性,可作为视盘肿胀鉴别诊断的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书