Brief Report: State Policy Contexts and Disability Risks Among Midlife Working-Age Latino Adults in the U.S.: Variation by Nativity and Citizenship Status.

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Population Research and Policy Review Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-23 DOI:10.1007/s11113-026-10022-6
Marc A Garcia, Blakelee R Kemp, Catherine García, Courtney E Boen, Rogelio Sáenz
{"title":"Brief Report: State Policy Contexts and Disability Risks Among Midlife Working-Age Latino Adults in the U.S.: Variation by Nativity and Citizenship Status.","authors":"Marc A Garcia, Blakelee R Kemp, Catherine García, Courtney E Boen, Rogelio Sáenz","doi":"10.1007/s11113-026-10022-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disability risks among midlife Latino adults in the United States are strongly patterned along axes of stratification such as nativity and citizenship status. Another increasingly salient axis of inequality in disability risk is geographic context, such as U.S. state political environments. While prior research highlights the importance of specific state policies, such as Medicaid, in shaping health-related outcomes, few studies have examined how broader policy contexts and ideologies, such as policy liberalism, influence disability risk, particularly among Latino adults. This study combines data from the 2008-2019 American Community Survey (ACS) with state-level measures of overall, economic, and social policy liberalism to examine how these dimensions of policy context influence disability risks among a diverse sample of midlife working-age Latino adults ([Formula: see text] = 1,103,993). Using logistic regression models, we evaluate the associations between state policy liberalism (overall, economic, and social domains) and disability and assess differences by nativity and citizenship status. Results indicate that greater overall and economic policy liberalism were associated with lower probabilities of disability among midlife Latino adults. The magnitude of this association varied by nativity and citizenship, with U.S.-born Latino adults experiencing greater declines in disability across more liberal policy contexts compared to foreign-born Latino adults. Additionally, compared to the naturalized and non-citizens, citizens experienced greater declines in disability across more liberal policy contexts. These results suggest that state policy contexts that promote and protect social and economic supports, such as improving access to labor protections, can reduce the burden of disability, particularly among U.S.-born and citizen Latino adults.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11113-026-10022-6.</p>","PeriodicalId":47633,"journal":{"name":"Population Research and Policy Review","volume":"45 4","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13290800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Research and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-026-10022-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disability risks among midlife Latino adults in the United States are strongly patterned along axes of stratification such as nativity and citizenship status. Another increasingly salient axis of inequality in disability risk is geographic context, such as U.S. state political environments. While prior research highlights the importance of specific state policies, such as Medicaid, in shaping health-related outcomes, few studies have examined how broader policy contexts and ideologies, such as policy liberalism, influence disability risk, particularly among Latino adults. This study combines data from the 2008-2019 American Community Survey (ACS) with state-level measures of overall, economic, and social policy liberalism to examine how these dimensions of policy context influence disability risks among a diverse sample of midlife working-age Latino adults ([Formula: see text] = 1,103,993). Using logistic regression models, we evaluate the associations between state policy liberalism (overall, economic, and social domains) and disability and assess differences by nativity and citizenship status. Results indicate that greater overall and economic policy liberalism were associated with lower probabilities of disability among midlife Latino adults. The magnitude of this association varied by nativity and citizenship, with U.S.-born Latino adults experiencing greater declines in disability across more liberal policy contexts compared to foreign-born Latino adults. Additionally, compared to the naturalized and non-citizens, citizens experienced greater declines in disability across more liberal policy contexts. These results suggest that state policy contexts that promote and protect social and economic supports, such as improving access to labor protections, can reduce the burden of disability, particularly among U.S.-born and citizen Latino adults.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11113-026-10022-6.

简要报告:国家政策背景和美国中年工作年龄拉丁裔成年人的残疾风险:出生和公民身份的变化。
在美国,拉丁裔中年成年人的残疾风险在很大程度上是按照出生和公民身份等分层轴来划分的。另一个日益突出的残疾风险不平等轴是地理环境,比如美国各州的政治环境。虽然先前的研究强调了具体的国家政策(如医疗补助计划)在塑造健康相关结果方面的重要性,但很少有研究考察了更广泛的政策背景和意识形态(如政策自由主义)如何影响残疾风险,特别是在拉丁裔成年人中。本研究将2008-2019年美国社区调查(ACS)的数据与国家层面的总体、经济和社会政策自由主义指标结合起来,研究政策背景的这些维度如何影响不同样本的中年工作年龄拉丁裔成年人的残疾风险([计算式:见文本]= 1,103,993)。使用逻辑回归模型,我们评估了国家政策自由主义(总体、经济和社会领域)与残疾之间的联系,并评估了出生地和公民身份的差异。结果表明,在拉丁美洲中年成年人中,更大的整体和经济政策自由主义与较低的残疾概率有关。这种关联的程度因出生地和国籍而异,在更自由的政策背景下,与在外国出生的拉丁裔成年人相比,在美国出生的拉丁裔成年人的残疾程度下降幅度更大。此外,与入籍和非公民相比,在更自由的政策背景下,公民的残疾程度下降幅度更大。这些结果表明,促进和保护社会和经济支持的国家政策背景,例如改善获得劳动保护的机会,可以减轻残疾负担,特别是在美国出生和公民的拉丁裔成年人中。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s11113-026-10022-6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Now accepted in JSTOR! Population Research and Policy Review has a twofold goal: it provides a convenient source for government officials and scholars in which they can learn about the policy implications of recent research relevant to the causes and consequences of changing population size and composition; and it provides a broad, interdisciplinary coverage of population research. Population Research and Policy Review seeks to publish quality material of interest to professionals working in the fields of population, and those fields which intersect and overlap with population studies. The publication includes demographic, economic, social, political and health research papers and related contributions which are based on either the direct scientific evaluation of particular policies or programs, or general contributions intended to advance knowledge that informs policy and program development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书