Endothelial progenitor cell susceptibility to DNA damaging and DDR-modulating compounds determines endothelial differentiation accuracy.

IF 7.8 2区 医学 Q1 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Sina Federmann, Michelle Westerhoff, Andreas S Reichert, Gerhard Fritz
{"title":"Endothelial progenitor cell susceptibility to DNA damaging and DDR-modulating compounds determines endothelial differentiation accuracy.","authors":"Sina Federmann, Michelle Westerhoff, Andreas S Reichert, Gerhard Fritz","doi":"10.1186/s13287-026-05087-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical use of the anticancer drug doxorubicin (Dox) is limited by irreversible cardiotoxicity. The pathophysiological relevance of different cardiac cell types, including endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), in this process is unclear. Since progenitor cells are particularly relevant for tissue regeneration, we hypothesize that residual damage resulting from Dox-based therapeutic regimen may influence their endothelial differentiation accuracy. Therefore, we comparatively investigated the response of murine embryonic stem cells (mESC), endothelial progenitor cells (EC d4) and terminally differentiated endothelial-like cells (EC d6) following exposure to Dox and selected pharmacological inhibitors of DNA repair/DNA damage response (DDR) (RAD51i B02; HDACi entinostat (EST)). We show that EC d4 exhibit enhanced Dox sensitivity as compared to mESC and EC d6. EdU incorporation and replication fork progression analyses revealed pronounced agent-specific differences between mESC, EC d4 and EC d6. Furthermore, DNA damage formation varied in a drug-dependent manner, with mESC showing enhanced residual levels of DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) as compared to EC d4 and EC d6 while EC d6 revealed highest levels of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB). Dox treatment of EC d4 did not prevent their further differentiation into EC d6. However, it caused several functional impairments in the surviving EC d6 progeny, including defects in mitochondrial homeostasis, endothelial barrier function related to cell-cell adhesion factors (ZO1, VE-cadherin), cytokine response and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake. This is accompanied by increased senescence. Summarizing, we demonstrate both overlapping and agent-specific responses of mESC, EC d4 and EC d6 to Dox and DNA repair/DDR inhibitors. Notably, drug treatment of EPC (EC d4) causes multiple dysfunctions in differentiated EC d6. Hence, pharmacological measures aiming to specifically protect EPC from Dox-induced damage are suggested to foster the maintenance of healthy endothelial functionality during regeneration, thereby lowering the risk of detrimental late cardiotoxicity resulting from Dox-based anticancer regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":21876,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cell Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13308190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cell Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-026-05087-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The clinical use of the anticancer drug doxorubicin (Dox) is limited by irreversible cardiotoxicity. The pathophysiological relevance of different cardiac cell types, including endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), in this process is unclear. Since progenitor cells are particularly relevant for tissue regeneration, we hypothesize that residual damage resulting from Dox-based therapeutic regimen may influence their endothelial differentiation accuracy. Therefore, we comparatively investigated the response of murine embryonic stem cells (mESC), endothelial progenitor cells (EC d4) and terminally differentiated endothelial-like cells (EC d6) following exposure to Dox and selected pharmacological inhibitors of DNA repair/DNA damage response (DDR) (RAD51i B02; HDACi entinostat (EST)). We show that EC d4 exhibit enhanced Dox sensitivity as compared to mESC and EC d6. EdU incorporation and replication fork progression analyses revealed pronounced agent-specific differences between mESC, EC d4 and EC d6. Furthermore, DNA damage formation varied in a drug-dependent manner, with mESC showing enhanced residual levels of DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) as compared to EC d4 and EC d6 while EC d6 revealed highest levels of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB). Dox treatment of EC d4 did not prevent their further differentiation into EC d6. However, it caused several functional impairments in the surviving EC d6 progeny, including defects in mitochondrial homeostasis, endothelial barrier function related to cell-cell adhesion factors (ZO1, VE-cadherin), cytokine response and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake. This is accompanied by increased senescence. Summarizing, we demonstrate both overlapping and agent-specific responses of mESC, EC d4 and EC d6 to Dox and DNA repair/DDR inhibitors. Notably, drug treatment of EPC (EC d4) causes multiple dysfunctions in differentiated EC d6. Hence, pharmacological measures aiming to specifically protect EPC from Dox-induced damage are suggested to foster the maintenance of healthy endothelial functionality during regeneration, thereby lowering the risk of detrimental late cardiotoxicity resulting from Dox-based anticancer regimen.

内皮祖细胞对DNA损伤和ddr调节化合物的易感性决定了内皮分化的准确性。
抗肿瘤药物阿霉素(Dox)的临床应用受到不可逆心脏毒性的限制。不同类型的心脏细胞,包括内皮祖细胞(EPC)在这一过程中的病理生理相关性尚不清楚。由于祖细胞与组织再生特别相关,我们假设基于dox的治疗方案造成的残余损伤可能会影响其内皮细胞分化的准确性。因此,我们比较研究了小鼠胚胎干细胞(mESC)、内皮祖细胞(EC d4)和终分化内皮样细胞(EC d6)暴露于Dox和选定的DNA修复/DNA损伤反应(DDR)药理学抑制剂(RAD51i B02; HDACi entinostat (EST))后的反应。我们发现,与mESC和EC d6相比,EC d4表现出增强的Dox敏感性。EdU结合和复制叉进展分析显示,mESC、EC d4和EC d6之间存在明显的药物特异性差异。此外,DNA损伤形成以药物依赖的方式变化,与EC d4和EC d6相比,mESC显示出更高水平的DNA单链断裂(SSB),而EC d6显示出最高水平的DNA双链断裂(DSB)。经Dox处理的ecd4未阻止其进一步分化为ecd6。然而,它在存活的EC d6后代中引起了一些功能损伤,包括线粒体稳态缺陷、与细胞-细胞粘附因子(ZO1、VE-cadherin)、细胞因子反应和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)摄取相关的内皮屏障功能缺陷。这伴随着衰老的增加。综上所述,我们证明了mESC、EC d4和EC d6对Dox和DNA修复/DDR抑制剂的重叠反应和药物特异性反应。值得注意的是,EPC (EC d4)的药物治疗导致分化的EC d6出现多种功能障碍。因此,建议采取药理学措施,专门保护EPC免受dox诱导的损伤,以促进再生过程中内皮功能的健康维持,从而降低基于dox的抗癌方案导致的有害晚期心脏毒性的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Stem Cell Research & Therapy CELL BIOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Stem Cell Research & Therapy serves as a leading platform for translational research in stem cell therapies. This international, peer-reviewed journal publishes high-quality open-access research articles, with a focus on basic, translational, and clinical research in stem cell therapeutics and regenerative therapies. Coverage includes animal models and clinical trials. Additionally, the journal offers reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, and reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书