Innovative Approaches to Advancing Equitable Access to Insomnia Interventions.

IF 3.3 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Current Sleep Medicine Reports Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-23 DOI:10.1007/s40675-026-00385-9
Sophia Oliver, Kelly Dombek, Anne E Milner, Allison G Harvey
{"title":"Innovative Approaches to Advancing Equitable Access to Insomnia Interventions.","authors":"Sophia Oliver, Kelly Dombek, Anne E Milner, Allison G Harvey","doi":"10.1007/s40675-026-00385-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Insomnia disorder is a prevalent and impairing sleep-wake disorder characterized by persistent difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep, accompanied by daytime impairment. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the recommended first-line treatment and has a strong evidence base. Building on this foundation, recent work has increasingly focused on translating these advances into accessible and scalable interventions. This review (1) highlights key challenges in the delivery of insomnia interventions that constrain equitable access and (2) examines emerging approaches that may address these gaps.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent research has identified four primary challenges limiting equitable access to insomnia interventions: high comorbidity with mental health and other sleep and circadian disorders, limited testing and adaptation outside of academic settings, a shortage of trained providers, and structural barriers related to funding and reimbursement. In response, growing evidence supports transdiagnostic treatment approaches, implementation strategies for real-world settings, delivery by non-specialist providers, brief and single-session interventions, and digital and stepped care models as promising pathways to improve access and scalability.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Our review underscores the importance of moving beyond testing efficacy to address the practical and structural barriers that limit access to evidence-based insomnia interventions. Advancing research that prioritizes real-world application remains essential for narrowing the longstanding gap between evidence and practice and to improve equitable access to effective insomnia interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":37449,"journal":{"name":"Current Sleep Medicine Reports","volume":"12 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13291000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Sleep Medicine Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40675-026-00385-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Insomnia disorder is a prevalent and impairing sleep-wake disorder characterized by persistent difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep, accompanied by daytime impairment. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the recommended first-line treatment and has a strong evidence base. Building on this foundation, recent work has increasingly focused on translating these advances into accessible and scalable interventions. This review (1) highlights key challenges in the delivery of insomnia interventions that constrain equitable access and (2) examines emerging approaches that may address these gaps.

Recent findings: Recent research has identified four primary challenges limiting equitable access to insomnia interventions: high comorbidity with mental health and other sleep and circadian disorders, limited testing and adaptation outside of academic settings, a shortage of trained providers, and structural barriers related to funding and reimbursement. In response, growing evidence supports transdiagnostic treatment approaches, implementation strategies for real-world settings, delivery by non-specialist providers, brief and single-session interventions, and digital and stepped care models as promising pathways to improve access and scalability.

Summary: Our review underscores the importance of moving beyond testing efficacy to address the practical and structural barriers that limit access to evidence-based insomnia interventions. Advancing research that prioritizes real-world application remains essential for narrowing the longstanding gap between evidence and practice and to improve equitable access to effective insomnia interventions.

促进公平获得失眠干预措施的创新方法。
综述目的:失眠症是一种普遍存在的损害性睡眠-觉醒障碍,其特征是持续难以开始或维持睡眠,并伴有白天功能障碍。认知行为治疗失眠(CBT-I)是推荐的一线治疗方法,有很强的证据基础。在此基础上,最近的工作越来越侧重于将这些进展转化为可获得和可扩展的干预措施。本综述(1)强调了失眠干预措施提供中限制公平获取的关键挑战,(2)研究了可能解决这些差距的新方法。最近的发现:最近的研究确定了限制公平获得失眠干预措施的四个主要挑战:精神健康和其他睡眠和昼夜节律障碍的高共病性,学术环境之外的测试和适应有限,缺乏训练有素的提供者,以及与资金和报销有关的结构性障碍。因此,越来越多的证据支持跨诊断治疗方法、针对现实环境的实施策略、由非专业提供者提供服务、简短和单次干预以及数字化和阶梯式护理模式作为改善可及性和可扩展性的有希望的途径。总结:我们的综述强调了超越测试疗效的重要性,以解决限制获得循证失眠干预措施的实际和结构性障碍。推进优先考虑实际应用的研究对于缩小证据与实践之间的长期差距以及改善公平获得有效失眠干预措施仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Sleep Medicine Reports
Current Sleep Medicine Reports Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Current Sleep Medicine Reports aims to review the most important, recently published articles in the field of sleep medicine. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of sleep conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas such as insomnia, narcolepsy, sleep apnea, circadian rhythm disorders, and parasomnias.   Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also occasionally provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书