Julia L Gaida, Susanne M Stieger-Vanegas, Christoph J Lischer, Katja F Duesterdieck-Zellmer, Michael J Huber, J Lacy Kamm
{"title":"Radiation exposure to equine surgeons during simulated digital radiography and fluoroscopy-guided fracture fixation of the distal limb.","authors":"Julia L Gaida, Susanne M Stieger-Vanegas, Christoph J Lischer, Katja F Duesterdieck-Zellmer, Michael J Huber, J Lacy Kamm","doi":"10.1111/vsu.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite known occupational radiation risks, data on exposure during digital radiography (DR) or fluoroscopy-guided equine fracture repair are lacking. This study quantified radiation doses to a model surgeon's hand, lenses, thyroid, and gonads, and assessed protective effects of radiation-reducing surgical gloves and attenuating ointment.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Comparative, controlled, simulation-based study.</p><p><strong>Animal/sample population: </strong>Anthropomorphic model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Distal limb fracture fixation was simulated using a model with dosimeters at the region of the lenses, thyroid, gonads, drill-holding hand, and under a lead apron (fetal dose). Radiation was measured over 10 DR or 10 single-image fluoroscopy exposures, then repeated using radiation-reducing surgical gloves or ointment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All radiation doses were below occupational limits. Dosimeters placed at the level of the gonads (outside the gown) received the highest mean dose (DR: 6.87 ± 0.40 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.98 ± 0.28 μSv), followed by thyroid (outside the gown) (DR: 2.60 ± 0.52 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.48 ± 0.08 μSv), hand (DR: 2.02 ± 0.54 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.32 ± 0.06 μSv) and lenses (DR: 1.25 ± 0.28 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.23 ± 0.07 μSv). The lowest exposure was measured underneath the gown (fetal dose) (DR: 0.01 ± 0.01 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.01 ± 0.01 μSv). DR exposure exceeded fluoroscopy at all sites (p < .001). Radiation-reducing surgical gloves significantly lowered hand dose (p < .001), whereas ointment had no effect (p = .54). Off-beam hand exposure from 10 images was approximately one-millionth of the annual dose limit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Image-guided equine distal limb fracture fixation results in minimal hand radiation exposure, relative to other regions of the body, with DR producing higher doses than single-image fluoroscopy. Radiation-reducing surgical gloves significantly lower hand exposure during DR procedures.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Radiation-reducing surgical gloves offer additional protection and are recommended during image-guided surgery. Whenever feasible, pulsed fluoroscopy should be preferred over DR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1212-1222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Despite known occupational radiation risks, data on exposure during digital radiography (DR) or fluoroscopy-guided equine fracture repair are lacking. This study quantified radiation doses to a model surgeon's hand, lenses, thyroid, and gonads, and assessed protective effects of radiation-reducing surgical gloves and attenuating ointment.
Study design: Comparative, controlled, simulation-based study.
Animal/sample population: Anthropomorphic model.
Methods: Distal limb fracture fixation was simulated using a model with dosimeters at the region of the lenses, thyroid, gonads, drill-holding hand, and under a lead apron (fetal dose). Radiation was measured over 10 DR or 10 single-image fluoroscopy exposures, then repeated using radiation-reducing surgical gloves or ointment.
Results: All radiation doses were below occupational limits. Dosimeters placed at the level of the gonads (outside the gown) received the highest mean dose (DR: 6.87 ± 0.40 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.98 ± 0.28 μSv), followed by thyroid (outside the gown) (DR: 2.60 ± 0.52 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.48 ± 0.08 μSv), hand (DR: 2.02 ± 0.54 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.32 ± 0.06 μSv) and lenses (DR: 1.25 ± 0.28 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.23 ± 0.07 μSv). The lowest exposure was measured underneath the gown (fetal dose) (DR: 0.01 ± 0.01 μSv; fluoroscopy: 0.01 ± 0.01 μSv). DR exposure exceeded fluoroscopy at all sites (p < .001). Radiation-reducing surgical gloves significantly lowered hand dose (p < .001), whereas ointment had no effect (p = .54). Off-beam hand exposure from 10 images was approximately one-millionth of the annual dose limit.
Conclusion: Image-guided equine distal limb fracture fixation results in minimal hand radiation exposure, relative to other regions of the body, with DR producing higher doses than single-image fluoroscopy. Radiation-reducing surgical gloves significantly lower hand exposure during DR procedures.
Clinical significance: Radiation-reducing surgical gloves offer additional protection and are recommended during image-guided surgery. Whenever feasible, pulsed fluoroscopy should be preferred over DR.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations.
It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.