Perioperative Prophylaxis in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplantation: A Baseline Stewardship Audit Using Routine Electronic Data.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Transplant Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-25 DOI:10.1111/tid.70266
Charles B Foster, Kaitlyn Rivard, Venkatraman A Arakoni, Blanca E Gonzalez
{"title":"Perioperative Prophylaxis in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplantation: A Baseline Stewardship Audit Using Routine Electronic Data.","authors":"Charles B Foster, Kaitlyn Rivard, Venkatraman A Arakoni, Blanca E Gonzalez","doi":"10.1111/tid.70266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative antibacterial prophylaxis in pediatric solid organ transplantation varies by center in regimen, add-on agents, and stop dates. We used institutional protocols as a unified reference standard to establish baseline stewardship measures and targets for future quality-improvement work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated 164 pediatric transplants from 2010 to 2021. Using anesthesia timing and medication-administration data, we assessed on-time dosing, regimen selection, MRSA- and VRE-directed add-on agents, double anaerobic coverage, Gram-negative broadening during the protocol window, and discontinuation at organ-specific stop targets. We also used transplant-day anchoring and protocol-defined windows to describe whether primary-admission broad-spectrum exposure represented protocol-linked prophylaxis or later exposure. The audit measured protocol concordance and exposure patterns, not the appropriateness of deviations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prophylaxis was given on time in 95.7% of procedures. Overall, 87.2% received the recommended initial regimen, 7.3% the protocol-defined beta-lactam allergy regimen, and 4.3% another broad Gram-negative regimen. Only 61.0% stopped the main regimen by the intended cutoff; stop performance was best in kidney transplantation and poorest in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. MRSA-directed add-ons clustered in intestinal and multivisceral procedures and often extended beyond the intended duration. A secondary descriptive analysis identified contiguous protocol-linked continuation beyond the intended window in 8.6% of primary-admission broad-spectrum days of therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Timing and initial regimen selection were strong. The main baseline process measure requiring prospective review was continuation of protocol-linked antibiotics beyond cutoffs in abdominal transplantation. This audit shows how routine electronic data can be used to create reproducible measures and organ-specific targets for future stewardship and quality-improvement studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13638779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perioperative antibacterial prophylaxis in pediatric solid organ transplantation varies by center in regimen, add-on agents, and stop dates. We used institutional protocols as a unified reference standard to establish baseline stewardship measures and targets for future quality-improvement work.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 164 pediatric transplants from 2010 to 2021. Using anesthesia timing and medication-administration data, we assessed on-time dosing, regimen selection, MRSA- and VRE-directed add-on agents, double anaerobic coverage, Gram-negative broadening during the protocol window, and discontinuation at organ-specific stop targets. We also used transplant-day anchoring and protocol-defined windows to describe whether primary-admission broad-spectrum exposure represented protocol-linked prophylaxis or later exposure. The audit measured protocol concordance and exposure patterns, not the appropriateness of deviations.

Results: Prophylaxis was given on time in 95.7% of procedures. Overall, 87.2% received the recommended initial regimen, 7.3% the protocol-defined beta-lactam allergy regimen, and 4.3% another broad Gram-negative regimen. Only 61.0% stopped the main regimen by the intended cutoff; stop performance was best in kidney transplantation and poorest in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. MRSA-directed add-ons clustered in intestinal and multivisceral procedures and often extended beyond the intended duration. A secondary descriptive analysis identified contiguous protocol-linked continuation beyond the intended window in 8.6% of primary-admission broad-spectrum days of therapy.

Conclusions: Timing and initial regimen selection were strong. The main baseline process measure requiring prospective review was continuation of protocol-linked antibiotics beyond cutoffs in abdominal transplantation. This audit shows how routine electronic data can be used to create reproducible measures and organ-specific targets for future stewardship and quality-improvement studies.

儿童实体器官移植围手术期预防:使用常规电子数据的基线管理审计。
背景:儿童实体器官移植围手术期抗菌预防因治疗方案、附加药物和停药日期而异。我们使用机构协议作为统一的参考标准,为未来的质量改进工作建立基线管理措施和目标。方法:我们回顾性评估了2010年至2021年的164例儿科移植。利用麻醉时间和给药数据,我们评估了按时给药、方案选择、MRSA和vre导向的附加药物、双厌氧覆盖、方案窗口期间的革兰氏阴性扩大以及器官特异性停止靶点停药。我们还使用移植日锚定和方案定义的窗口来描述初次入院广谱暴露是否代表与方案相关的预防或后来的暴露。审计衡量的是协议的一致性和公开模式,而不是偏差的适当性。结果:95.7%的患者及时给予预防。总体而言,87.2%的患者接受了推荐的初始方案,7.3%的患者接受了方案定义的β -内酰胺过敏方案,4.3%的患者接受了另一种广义革兰氏阴性方案。只有61.0%的人在预定的截止日期前停止了主方案;肾移植停药效果最好,肠和多脏器移植停药效果最差。mrsa导向的附加物聚集在肠道和多内脏手术中,并且经常超出预期的持续时间。一项次要的描述性分析发现,在8.6%的初次入院广谱治疗天数中,连续治疗方案相关的延续超过了预期的窗口期。结论:时间和初始方案的选择是强有力的。需要前瞻性审查的主要基线过程测量是在腹部移植中超过临界值继续使用与方案相关的抗生素。该审计显示了如何使用常规电子数据为未来的管理和质量改进研究创建可重复的测量和器官特异性目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant Infectious Disease
Transplant Infectious Disease 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
210
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal. Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书