Charles B Foster, Kaitlyn Rivard, Venkatraman A Arakoni, Blanca E Gonzalez
{"title":"Perioperative Prophylaxis in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplantation: A Baseline Stewardship Audit Using Routine Electronic Data.","authors":"Charles B Foster, Kaitlyn Rivard, Venkatraman A Arakoni, Blanca E Gonzalez","doi":"10.1111/tid.70266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative antibacterial prophylaxis in pediatric solid organ transplantation varies by center in regimen, add-on agents, and stop dates. We used institutional protocols as a unified reference standard to establish baseline stewardship measures and targets for future quality-improvement work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated 164 pediatric transplants from 2010 to 2021. Using anesthesia timing and medication-administration data, we assessed on-time dosing, regimen selection, MRSA- and VRE-directed add-on agents, double anaerobic coverage, Gram-negative broadening during the protocol window, and discontinuation at organ-specific stop targets. We also used transplant-day anchoring and protocol-defined windows to describe whether primary-admission broad-spectrum exposure represented protocol-linked prophylaxis or later exposure. The audit measured protocol concordance and exposure patterns, not the appropriateness of deviations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prophylaxis was given on time in 95.7% of procedures. Overall, 87.2% received the recommended initial regimen, 7.3% the protocol-defined beta-lactam allergy regimen, and 4.3% another broad Gram-negative regimen. Only 61.0% stopped the main regimen by the intended cutoff; stop performance was best in kidney transplantation and poorest in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. MRSA-directed add-ons clustered in intestinal and multivisceral procedures and often extended beyond the intended duration. A secondary descriptive analysis identified contiguous protocol-linked continuation beyond the intended window in 8.6% of primary-admission broad-spectrum days of therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Timing and initial regimen selection were strong. The main baseline process measure requiring prospective review was continuation of protocol-linked antibiotics beyond cutoffs in abdominal transplantation. This audit shows how routine electronic data can be used to create reproducible measures and organ-specific targets for future stewardship and quality-improvement studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23318,"journal":{"name":"Transplant Infectious Disease","volume":" ","pages":"e70266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13638779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.70266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Perioperative antibacterial prophylaxis in pediatric solid organ transplantation varies by center in regimen, add-on agents, and stop dates. We used institutional protocols as a unified reference standard to establish baseline stewardship measures and targets for future quality-improvement work.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 164 pediatric transplants from 2010 to 2021. Using anesthesia timing and medication-administration data, we assessed on-time dosing, regimen selection, MRSA- and VRE-directed add-on agents, double anaerobic coverage, Gram-negative broadening during the protocol window, and discontinuation at organ-specific stop targets. We also used transplant-day anchoring and protocol-defined windows to describe whether primary-admission broad-spectrum exposure represented protocol-linked prophylaxis or later exposure. The audit measured protocol concordance and exposure patterns, not the appropriateness of deviations.
Results: Prophylaxis was given on time in 95.7% of procedures. Overall, 87.2% received the recommended initial regimen, 7.3% the protocol-defined beta-lactam allergy regimen, and 4.3% another broad Gram-negative regimen. Only 61.0% stopped the main regimen by the intended cutoff; stop performance was best in kidney transplantation and poorest in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. MRSA-directed add-ons clustered in intestinal and multivisceral procedures and often extended beyond the intended duration. A secondary descriptive analysis identified contiguous protocol-linked continuation beyond the intended window in 8.6% of primary-admission broad-spectrum days of therapy.
Conclusions: Timing and initial regimen selection were strong. The main baseline process measure requiring prospective review was continuation of protocol-linked antibiotics beyond cutoffs in abdominal transplantation. This audit shows how routine electronic data can be used to create reproducible measures and organ-specific targets for future stewardship and quality-improvement studies.
期刊介绍:
Transplant Infectious Disease has been established as a forum for presenting the most current information on the prevention and treatment of infection complicating organ and bone marrow transplantation. The point of view of the journal is that infection and allograft rejection (or graft-versus-host disease) are closely intertwined, and that advances in one area will have immediate consequences on the other. The interaction of the transplant recipient with potential microbial invaders, the impact of immunosuppressive strategies on this interaction, and the effects of cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines liberated during the course of infections, rejection, or graft-versus-host disease are central to the interests and mission of this journal.
Transplant Infectious Disease is aimed at disseminating the latest information relevant to the infectious disease complications of transplantation to clinicians and scientists involved in bone marrow, kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestinal, and pancreatic transplantation. The infectious disease consequences and concerns regarding innovative transplant strategies, from novel immunosuppressive agents to xenotransplantation, are very much a concern of this journal. In addition, this journal feels a particular responsibility to inform primary care practitioners in the community, who increasingly are sharing the responsibility for the care of these patients, of the special considerations regarding the prevention and treatment of infection in transplant recipients. As exemplified by the international editorial board, articles are sought throughout the world that address both general issues and those of a more restricted geographic import.