Effectiveness of health education interventions on breast cancer literacy and breast screening uptake in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review protocol.
{"title":"Effectiveness of health education interventions on breast cancer literacy and breast screening uptake in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review protocol.","authors":"Joshua Okyere, Bibha Simkhada, Padam Simkhada","doi":"10.1186/s13643-026-03243-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extant literature identifies low breast cancer literacy as a major reason for the low uptake of breast cancer screening among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Recognizing the potential of health education interventions to improve breast cancer literacy, researchers in SSA have implemented varied interventions. However, evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions in SSA is limited and fragmented, with variations in educational strategies, delivery methods, and cultural contexts. A systematic review is needed to synthesize existing evidence, assess the effectiveness of health education interventions in improving breast cancer literacy and screening uptake, and guide the development of culturally appropriate interventions aimed at improving breast cancer outcomes in SSA.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study is to review empirical evidence on the effectiveness of health education interventions on breast cancer literacy and breast screening uptake in SSA. Specifically, the review seeks to identify the methods of delivering breast cancer education in SSA, determine the effectiveness of educational interventions on breast cancer literacy, and assess the effectiveness of educational interventions on breast cancer screening uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review will include randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies conducted among women aged 15 years and older in sub-Saharan Africa. Studies evaluating health education interventions designed to improve breast cancer literacy, awareness, or screening uptake will be eligible. Searches will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and selected grey literature sources. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, assess eligibility, extract data, and evaluate methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2) and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist, as appropriate. Findings will be synthesized narratively and, where sufficient methodological homogeneity exists, pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>It is envisioned that this study will provide evidence of the various health education interventions implemented across SSA to improve breast cancer literacy and screening uptake. It is also anticipated that the study will provide a means of comparing the effectiveness of the different interventions to inform policy and intervention scaling funds decisions in SSA.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>The protocol is prospectively registered in Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XWKU9 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13560311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03243-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The extant literature identifies low breast cancer literacy as a major reason for the low uptake of breast cancer screening among women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Recognizing the potential of health education interventions to improve breast cancer literacy, researchers in SSA have implemented varied interventions. However, evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions in SSA is limited and fragmented, with variations in educational strategies, delivery methods, and cultural contexts. A systematic review is needed to synthesize existing evidence, assess the effectiveness of health education interventions in improving breast cancer literacy and screening uptake, and guide the development of culturally appropriate interventions aimed at improving breast cancer outcomes in SSA.
Objectives: The aim of the study is to review empirical evidence on the effectiveness of health education interventions on breast cancer literacy and breast screening uptake in SSA. Specifically, the review seeks to identify the methods of delivering breast cancer education in SSA, determine the effectiveness of educational interventions on breast cancer literacy, and assess the effectiveness of educational interventions on breast cancer screening uptake.
Methods: This systematic review will include randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies conducted among women aged 15 years and older in sub-Saharan Africa. Studies evaluating health education interventions designed to improve breast cancer literacy, awareness, or screening uptake will be eligible. Searches will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and selected grey literature sources. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, assess eligibility, extract data, and evaluate methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2) and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist, as appropriate. Findings will be synthesized narratively and, where sufficient methodological homogeneity exists, pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.
Discussion: It is envisioned that this study will provide evidence of the various health education interventions implemented across SSA to improve breast cancer literacy and screening uptake. It is also anticipated that the study will provide a means of comparing the effectiveness of the different interventions to inform policy and intervention scaling funds decisions in SSA.
Systematic review registration: The protocol is prospectively registered in Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XWKU9 ).
背景:现有文献表明,低乳腺癌素养是撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)妇女乳腺癌筛查率低的主要原因。认识到健康教育干预措施在提高乳腺癌认识方面的潜力,SSA的研究人员实施了各种干预措施。然而,关于这些干预措施在SSA中的有效性的证据是有限和分散的,因为教育策略、交付方法和文化背景存在差异。需要进行系统综述,以综合现有证据,评估健康教育干预措施在提高乳腺癌扫盲和筛查吸收方面的有效性,并指导制定文化上适当的干预措施,以改善SSA的乳腺癌结局。目的:本研究的目的是回顾健康教育干预对SSA乳腺癌扫盲和乳房筛查的有效性的经验证据。具体而言,本综述旨在确定在SSA提供乳腺癌教育的方法,确定教育干预对乳腺癌扫盲的有效性,并评估教育干预对乳腺癌筛查的有效性。方法:本系统综述将包括在撒哈拉以南非洲地区15岁及以上妇女中进行的随机对照试验和准实验研究。评估旨在提高乳腺癌素养、意识或筛查吸收的健康教育干预措施的研究将符合条件。检索将在PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychInfo和选定的灰色文献来源中进行。两名审稿人将独立筛选研究,评估合格性,提取数据,并酌情使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)和乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估清单评估方法学质量。研究结果将以叙述的方式进行综合,如果方法上存在足够的同质性,则使用随机效应荟萃分析进行汇总。讨论:预计本研究将为在SSA实施的各种健康教育干预措施提供证据,以提高乳腺癌扫盲和筛查的接受程度。预计该研究还将提供一种比较不同干预措施有效性的方法,为特别援助政策和干预措施的资金规模决策提供信息。系统评价注册:该方案有望在开放科学框架(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XWKU9)中注册。
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.