Prognostic consistency of oncotype DX® molecular assay across racial groups in early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Reine Abou Zeidane, Benjamin Hauk, Samuel Lichtman-Mikol, Courtney Pisano, Yilun Sun, Priyanka Shailendra Rana, Citlally Lopez-Flores, Breanna N McBean, Kassidy M Jungles, Trisha Lal, Nihit Mehta, Philip Bomeisl, Amanda L Amin, Alberto J Montero, Janice Lyons, Corey W Speers
{"title":"Prognostic consistency of oncotype DX® molecular assay across racial groups in early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.","authors":"Reine Abou Zeidane, Benjamin Hauk, Samuel Lichtman-Mikol, Courtney Pisano, Yilun Sun, Priyanka Shailendra Rana, Citlally Lopez-Flores, Breanna N McBean, Kassidy M Jungles, Trisha Lal, Nihit Mehta, Philip Bomeisl, Amanda L Amin, Alberto J Montero, Janice Lyons, Corey W Speers","doi":"10.1038/s41523-026-00996-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the consistency of prognostic outcomes provided by the Oncotype DX® assay across different racial groups among women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) breast cancer. Data was abstracted from the electronic medical record of 1122 patients with non-metastatic HR+ breast cancer who underwent Oncotype DX testing at University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center between 2013 and 2023. Recurrence Score (RS) categories were defined using historical cutpoints: low(0-18), intermediate(19-30), and high(31-100). Two contemporary-cutpoint sensitivity analyses based on TAILORx and RxPONDER were also performed: binary scheme (0-25;26-100) and three-level scheme (RS 0-15;16-25;26-100). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox models. The cohort included 142 African American (AA) and 967 White women. Under the historical cutpoints, AA women had a higher prevalence of intermediate and high-risk RS. Despite these differences, 5-year RFS and OS were comparable. In multivariable analyses, AA race was not independently associated with RFS or OS. Sensitivity analyses using contemporary cutpoints yielded concordant findings. These findings support consistent prognostic value of Oncotype DX assay across racial groups, although further investigation into socioeconomic and clinical contributors to disparities is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19247,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-026-00996-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the consistency of prognostic outcomes provided by the Oncotype DX® assay across different racial groups among women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) breast cancer. Data was abstracted from the electronic medical record of 1122 patients with non-metastatic HR+ breast cancer who underwent Oncotype DX testing at University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center between 2013 and 2023. Recurrence Score (RS) categories were defined using historical cutpoints: low(0-18), intermediate(19-30), and high(31-100). Two contemporary-cutpoint sensitivity analyses based on TAILORx and RxPONDER were also performed: binary scheme (0-25;26-100) and three-level scheme (RS 0-15;16-25;26-100). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox models. The cohort included 142 African American (AA) and 967 White women. Under the historical cutpoints, AA women had a higher prevalence of intermediate and high-risk RS. Despite these differences, 5-year RFS and OS were comparable. In multivariable analyses, AA race was not independently associated with RFS or OS. Sensitivity analyses using contemporary cutpoints yielded concordant findings. These findings support consistent prognostic value of Oncotype DX assay across racial groups, although further investigation into socioeconomic and clinical contributors to disparities is warranted.

早期激素受体阳性乳腺癌oncotype DX®分子检测在种族间的预后一致性
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们评估了Oncotype DX®检测在不同种族早期激素受体阳性(HR +)乳腺癌患者中预后结果的一致性。数据摘自2013年至2023年间在University Hospitals Seidman cancer Center接受Oncotype DX检测的1122例非转移性HR+乳腺癌患者的电子病历。复发评分(RS)分类使用历史临界值定义:低(0-18)、中(19-30)和高(31-100)。基于TAILORx和RxPONDER的两个当代切点敏感性分析也进行了:二进制方案(0-25;26-100)和三级方案(RS 0-15;16-25;26-100)。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和校正Cox模型分析无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。该队列包括142名非裔美国人(AA)和967名白人女性。在历史临界值下,AA组女性中、高风险RS患病率较高。尽管存在这些差异,但5年RFS和OS具有可比性。在多变量分析中,AA种族与RFS或OS没有独立的相关性。使用当代切点的敏感性分析得出了一致的结果。这些发现支持Oncotype DX检测在不同种族间的一致预后价值,尽管对差异的社会经济和临床因素的进一步调查是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Breast Cancer
NPJ Breast Cancer Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Breast Cancer publishes original research articles, reviews, brief correspondence, meeting reports, editorial summaries and hypothesis generating observations which could be unexplained or preliminary findings from experiments, novel ideas, or the framing of new questions that need to be solved. Featured topics of the journal include imaging, immunotherapy, molecular classification of disease, mechanism-based therapies largely targeting signal transduction pathways, carcinogenesis including hereditary susceptibility and molecular epidemiology, survivorship issues including long-term toxicities of treatment and secondary neoplasm occurrence, the biophysics of cancer, mechanisms of metastasis and their perturbation, and studies of the tumor microenvironment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书