Whole metagenome sequencing: not deep enough for complete microbial function recovery.

IF 14.9 1区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Jia Liu, Modupe Oluseun Coker, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters, Oluwaseun Peter, Nosakhare Lawrence Idemudia, Nicolas F Schlecht, Ozoemene Obuekwe, Fidelis E Eki-Udoko, Yana Bromberg
{"title":"Whole metagenome sequencing: not deep enough for complete microbial function recovery.","authors":"Jia Liu, Modupe Oluseun Coker, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters, Oluwaseun Peter, Nosakhare Lawrence Idemudia, Nicolas F Schlecht, Ozoemene Obuekwe, Fidelis E Eki-Udoko, Yana Bromberg","doi":"10.1186/s40168-026-02448-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole metagenome shotgun sequencing (WMS) is widely used to profile microbial function. However, technical variability in sequencing and analysis often obscures true biological patterns. Large-scale studies are particularly susceptible to batch effects, such as differences in sequencing depth and platform and annotation strategies, as well as sample-to-flow-cell assignments. However, the relative effects of these factors on functional inference in such studies have yet to be systematically evaluated. We analyzed oral-rinse WMS data from 671 Nigerian youths aged 9-18, sequenced on two Illumina platforms. Microbial molecular functionality encoded in these data was annotated using the mi-faser/Fusion pipeline, to capture the broad functional repertoire, and HUMAnN 3/EC numbers pipeline to characterize curated enzymatic activities. We then quantified how technical factors and batch effects shaped the recovery of microbial functionality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three findings of our work were most salient. First, we observed that the choice of annotation strategy traded off between breadth and specificity of functional coverage. Second, we found that low-prevalence functions were disproportionately lost at shallow sequencing depths, indicating that in, e.g., case-control studies with few representatives of the minor class, sequencing depth could critically impact study resolution. Finally, using our newly developed model relating sequencing depth to functional recovery, we demonstrated that increasing sequencing depth does not directly or proportionally improve functional recall. That is, at as little as 10% of this study's sequencing depth, 30% of the estimated complete microbiome functional repertoire was detectable. However, even at the full depth used in this study, we were only able to recover an estimated 60% of that complete functional repertoire. We further showed that despite biomes differences in functional diversity and host contamination levels (e.g., soil, fecal), incomplete functional recovery at commonly used sequencing depths was consistently observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Together, these findings and our depth-to-function mapping framework provide practical guidelines for the design and interpretation of WMS studies. Coordinating sequencing depth planning with annotation strategy, experimental design, and rigorous batch control is thus essential for robust detection of microbial functions and for ensuring reproducible microbiome insights. Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":18447,"journal":{"name":"Microbiome","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13556019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-026-02448-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whole metagenome shotgun sequencing (WMS) is widely used to profile microbial function. However, technical variability in sequencing and analysis often obscures true biological patterns. Large-scale studies are particularly susceptible to batch effects, such as differences in sequencing depth and platform and annotation strategies, as well as sample-to-flow-cell assignments. However, the relative effects of these factors on functional inference in such studies have yet to be systematically evaluated. We analyzed oral-rinse WMS data from 671 Nigerian youths aged 9-18, sequenced on two Illumina platforms. Microbial molecular functionality encoded in these data was annotated using the mi-faser/Fusion pipeline, to capture the broad functional repertoire, and HUMAnN 3/EC numbers pipeline to characterize curated enzymatic activities. We then quantified how technical factors and batch effects shaped the recovery of microbial functionality.

Results: Three findings of our work were most salient. First, we observed that the choice of annotation strategy traded off between breadth and specificity of functional coverage. Second, we found that low-prevalence functions were disproportionately lost at shallow sequencing depths, indicating that in, e.g., case-control studies with few representatives of the minor class, sequencing depth could critically impact study resolution. Finally, using our newly developed model relating sequencing depth to functional recovery, we demonstrated that increasing sequencing depth does not directly or proportionally improve functional recall. That is, at as little as 10% of this study's sequencing depth, 30% of the estimated complete microbiome functional repertoire was detectable. However, even at the full depth used in this study, we were only able to recover an estimated 60% of that complete functional repertoire. We further showed that despite biomes differences in functional diversity and host contamination levels (e.g., soil, fecal), incomplete functional recovery at commonly used sequencing depths was consistently observed.

Conclusions: Together, these findings and our depth-to-function mapping framework provide practical guidelines for the design and interpretation of WMS studies. Coordinating sequencing depth planning with annotation strategy, experimental design, and rigorous batch control is thus essential for robust detection of microbial functions and for ensuring reproducible microbiome insights. Video Abstract.

全宏基因组测序:深度不足以完全恢复微生物功能。
背景:全宏基因组霰弹枪测序(WMS)被广泛用于微生物功能分析。然而,测序和分析的技术差异往往掩盖了真正的生物模式。大规模研究特别容易受到批处理效应的影响,例如测序深度、平台和注释策略的差异,以及样品到流动细胞的分配。然而,在这些研究中,这些因素对功能推断的相对影响尚未得到系统的评估。我们分析了671名9-18岁尼日利亚青年的口腔冲洗WMS数据,这些数据在两个Illumina平台上测序。在这些数据中编码的微生物分子功能使用mi-faser/Fusion管道进行注释,以捕获广泛的功能库,并使用HUMAnN 3/EC数字管道来表征策划的酶活性。然后,我们量化了技术因素和批量效应如何塑造微生物功能的恢复。结果:我们的工作有三个最突出的发现。首先,我们观察到注释策略的选择在功能覆盖的广度和特异性之间进行权衡。其次,我们发现低患病率功能在较浅的测序深度中不成比例地丢失,这表明,在少数少数类别代表的病例对照研究中,测序深度可能会严重影响研究的分辨率。最后,使用我们新开发的将测序深度与功能恢复联系起来的模型,我们证明了增加测序深度并不能直接或成比例地提高功能回忆。也就是说,仅在本研究测序深度的10%,就可以检测到估计的完整微生物组功能库的30%。然而,即使在本研究中使用的全深度,我们也只能恢复大约60%的完整功能。我们进一步表明,尽管生物群落在功能多样性和宿主污染水平(如土壤、粪便)方面存在差异,但在常用的测序深度,始终观察到不完全的功能恢复。总之,这些发现和我们的深度-功能映射框架为WMS研究的设计和解释提供了实用的指导。因此,协调测序深度规划与注释策略,实验设计和严格的批控制对于微生物功能的稳健检测和确保可复制的微生物组见解至关重要。视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiome
Microbiome MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
198
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbiome is a journal that focuses on studies of microbiomes in humans, animals, plants, and the environment. It covers both natural and manipulated microbiomes, such as those in agriculture. The journal is interested in research that uses meta-omics approaches or novel bioinformatics tools and emphasizes the community/host interaction and structure-function relationship within the microbiome. Studies that go beyond descriptive omics surveys and include experimental or theoretical approaches will be considered for publication. The journal also encourages research that establishes cause and effect relationships and supports proposed microbiome functions. However, studies of individual microbial isolates/species without exploring their impact on the host or the complex microbiome structures and functions will not be considered for publication. Microbiome is indexed in BIOSIS, Current Contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citations Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书