Quantitative EEG Analyses for Outcome Prediction in Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-05-22 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000001269
Michel J A M van Putten, Marleen C Tjepkema-Cloostermans
{"title":"Quantitative EEG Analyses for Outcome Prediction in Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest.","authors":"Michel J A M van Putten, Marleen C Tjepkema-Cloostermans","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conventional visual interpretation of EEG has several limitations, including inter- and intraobserver variability, a substantial review burden, and the need to reduce a continuously evolving spatiotemporal signal to categorical descriptions. Quantitative analysis of the EEG may help overcome some of these limitations by capturing signal characteristics and temporal dynamics that are difficult to summarize consistently in words alone. In this review, we briefly summarize the main approaches that have been used to support EEG-based outcome prediction in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. These range from explicit feature-based indices, such as the Cerebral Recovery Index, to machine-learning classifiers using larger EEG feature sets, and, more recently, to deep learning models trained directly on raw EEG. Importantly, these methods are relevant not only for the early identification of patients with a poor prognosis but also for identifying patients with a realistic chance of good neurologic recovery. Furthermore, qEEG increases objectivity, reducing dependence on categorical wording and supporting continuous bedside assessment of neurologic recovery. These approaches can reach sensitivities of 50% to 60% at specificities of > 99% for poor and > 95% for good neurologic outcome, respectively, particularly for early EEG (recorded < 24 hour after cardiac arrest). Within a multimodal prognostic framework, qEEG can serve as a valuable decision-support tool to assist final assessment by a trained electroencephalographer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"418-422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional visual interpretation of EEG has several limitations, including inter- and intraobserver variability, a substantial review burden, and the need to reduce a continuously evolving spatiotemporal signal to categorical descriptions. Quantitative analysis of the EEG may help overcome some of these limitations by capturing signal characteristics and temporal dynamics that are difficult to summarize consistently in words alone. In this review, we briefly summarize the main approaches that have been used to support EEG-based outcome prediction in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. These range from explicit feature-based indices, such as the Cerebral Recovery Index, to machine-learning classifiers using larger EEG feature sets, and, more recently, to deep learning models trained directly on raw EEG. Importantly, these methods are relevant not only for the early identification of patients with a poor prognosis but also for identifying patients with a realistic chance of good neurologic recovery. Furthermore, qEEG increases objectivity, reducing dependence on categorical wording and supporting continuous bedside assessment of neurologic recovery. These approaches can reach sensitivities of 50% to 60% at specificities of > 99% for poor and > 95% for good neurologic outcome, respectively, particularly for early EEG (recorded < 24 hour after cardiac arrest). Within a multimodal prognostic framework, qEEG can serve as a valuable decision-support tool to assist final assessment by a trained electroencephalographer.

定量脑电图分析对心脏骤停后昏迷患者预后的预测。
传统的脑电图视觉解释有几个局限性,包括观察者之间和观察者内部的可变性,大量的审查负担,以及需要将持续演变的时空信号简化为分类描述。脑电图的定量分析可以通过捕捉信号特征和时间动态来帮助克服这些限制,而这些特征和时间动态很难单独用文字来概括。在这篇综述中,我们简要总结了在心脏骤停后昏迷患者中用于支持基于脑电图的预后预测的主要方法。这些范围从明确的基于特征的指数,如大脑恢复指数,到使用更大的脑电图特征集的机器学习分类器,以及最近直接在原始脑电图上训练的深度学习模型。重要的是,这些方法不仅与早期识别预后不良的患者有关,而且与识别具有良好神经功能恢复现实机会的患者有关。此外,qEEG增加了客观性,减少了对分类措辞的依赖,并支持神经系统恢复的连续床边评估。这些方法的灵敏度可达50% - 60%,特异性为> - 99%,特异性为> - 95%,对神经系统预后差,特异性为> - 95%,特别是对早期EEG(心脏骤停后< 24小时记录)。在多模式预测框架内,qEEG可以作为一种有价值的决策支持工具,协助训练有素的脑电图学家进行最终评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书