{"title":"Risk Factors and Prognosis Analysis of Infiltrating Micropapillary Carcinoma of Breast: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Pengfei He, Yupeng Sha, Yige Lu, Tong Li, Xiaoming Li, Yixin Liu, Hui Pang, Jiguang Han, Quan Yuan","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S612948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a rare breast cancer subtype with high invasiveness and lymphovascular/lymph node metastasis. While poor prognosis is reported, long-term survival and roles of molecular subtyping/laboratory markers remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 653 IMPC patients from a Chinese center (as of December 2024). Kaplan-Meier estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); Cox regression assessed prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 653 patients with IMPC, the molecular subtype distribution was as follows: HR+/HER2-, 48.2%; HR+/HER2+, 35.4%; HR-/HER2-, 11.0%; and HR-/HER2+, 5.4%. Most patients had T1-2 disease and were postmenopausal. The 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 97.42% and 93.73%, respectively, while the 3-year and 5-year PFS rates were 90.66% and 81.20%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in PFS among molecular subtypes, but not in OS. In multivariable analysis, the HR+/HER2+ subtype and higher total bilirubin were independently associated with better PFS, whereas higher systemic immune-inflammation index and stage IIIB were associated with worse PFS. Poorer OS was independently associated with advanced stage, no surgery, alcohol consumption history, higher systemic immune-inflammation index, menopausal status, and elevated blood glucose, while mastectomy and endocrine therapy were associated with better OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IMPC shows favorable OS but requires progression risk monitoring. PFS varied by molecular subtype, while OS did not. Molecular typing, clinical stage, and inflammatory/biochemical markers aid prognosis and personalized treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9106,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","volume":"18 ","pages":"612948"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13291655/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S612948","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a rare breast cancer subtype with high invasiveness and lymphovascular/lymph node metastasis. While poor prognosis is reported, long-term survival and roles of molecular subtyping/laboratory markers remain unclear.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 653 IMPC patients from a Chinese center (as of December 2024). Kaplan-Meier estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); Cox regression assessed prognostic factors.
Results: Among 653 patients with IMPC, the molecular subtype distribution was as follows: HR+/HER2-, 48.2%; HR+/HER2+, 35.4%; HR-/HER2-, 11.0%; and HR-/HER2+, 5.4%. Most patients had T1-2 disease and were postmenopausal. The 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 97.42% and 93.73%, respectively, while the 3-year and 5-year PFS rates were 90.66% and 81.20%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in PFS among molecular subtypes, but not in OS. In multivariable analysis, the HR+/HER2+ subtype and higher total bilirubin were independently associated with better PFS, whereas higher systemic immune-inflammation index and stage IIIB were associated with worse PFS. Poorer OS was independently associated with advanced stage, no surgery, alcohol consumption history, higher systemic immune-inflammation index, menopausal status, and elevated blood glucose, while mastectomy and endocrine therapy were associated with better OS.
Conclusion: IMPC shows favorable OS but requires progression risk monitoring. PFS varied by molecular subtype, while OS did not. Molecular typing, clinical stage, and inflammatory/biochemical markers aid prognosis and personalized treatment.