{"title":"Intermediary Object States Are Activated by Sentences Describing Completed Events","authors":"Emma Wing, Gerry T. M. Altmann","doi":"10.1111/cogs.70237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Processing state change verb phrases (e.g., <i>fill the cookie jar</i>) during language comprehension appears to require the activation of representations encoding both the initial (an empty jar) and resultant states (a filled jar) of event participants. Given that the transitions between these states can generally be inferred (on the basis of experiential semantic knowledge), these boundary states may be the only states of event participants that are activated during sentence processing or at event boundaries. However, simulation-based accounts of representation and linguistic analyses of state change predicates suggest that, in addition to initial and resultant object states, intermediary object states should also be activated during sentence comprehension. To compare these two alternatives, we investigated the activation of initial, intermediary, and end object states by sentences describing completed events (e.g., <i>Jasmine filled/has filled the cookie jar</i>). Our results suggest that perceptual features associated with objects at intermediary points in an event are indeed activated and maintained in memory through at least the end of the event description. These findings support an account in which representations of the entire event sequence—not just the boundaries—are activated during language processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":48349,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Science","volume":"50 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.70237","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Processing state change verb phrases (e.g., fill the cookie jar) during language comprehension appears to require the activation of representations encoding both the initial (an empty jar) and resultant states (a filled jar) of event participants. Given that the transitions between these states can generally be inferred (on the basis of experiential semantic knowledge), these boundary states may be the only states of event participants that are activated during sentence processing or at event boundaries. However, simulation-based accounts of representation and linguistic analyses of state change predicates suggest that, in addition to initial and resultant object states, intermediary object states should also be activated during sentence comprehension. To compare these two alternatives, we investigated the activation of initial, intermediary, and end object states by sentences describing completed events (e.g., Jasmine filled/has filled the cookie jar). Our results suggest that perceptual features associated with objects at intermediary points in an event are indeed activated and maintained in memory through at least the end of the event description. These findings support an account in which representations of the entire event sequence—not just the boundaries—are activated during language processing.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Science publishes articles in all areas of cognitive science, covering such topics as knowledge representation, inference, memory processes, learning, problem solving, planning, perception, natural language understanding, connectionism, brain theory, motor control, intentional systems, and other areas of interdisciplinary concern. Highest priority is given to research reports that are specifically written for a multidisciplinary audience. The audience is primarily researchers in cognitive science and its associated fields, including anthropologists, education researchers, psychologists, philosophers, linguists, computer scientists, neuroscientists, and roboticists.