A Top-Down View of Global and Regional Carbon Budgets From an Ensemble of Atmospheric Inversions

IF 6.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
A. M. van der Woude, I. T. Luijkx, R. J. de Kok, W. Peters, F. Chevallier, C. Rödenbeck, P. Ciais, N. Chandra, K. Wang, R. Janardanan, H. van Asperen, A. Bastos, A. van den Berg, A. A. Bloom, S. Botía, K. Bowman, J. G. Canadell, R. A. F. de Souza, C. Q. Dias-Junior, L. Feng, P. Friedlingstein, L. V. Gatti, E. Gloor, K. Ishijima, F. Jiang, Z. Jin, W. Ju, X. Lan, J. Liu, Z. Liu, T. Machida, S. Maksyutov, A. C. Manning, A. Martinez, G. A. Martins, K. McKain, J. B. Miller, L. Nayagam, Y. Niwa, P. I. Palmer, P. K. Patra, P. A. Pickers, B. Poulter, B. B. Stephens, C. Sweeney, S. Wofsy, Z. Wu, D. Yang, J. Yun, N. Zeng
{"title":"A Top-Down View of Global and Regional Carbon Budgets From an Ensemble of Atmospheric Inversions","authors":"A. M. van der Woude,&nbsp;I. T. Luijkx,&nbsp;R. J. de Kok,&nbsp;W. Peters,&nbsp;F. Chevallier,&nbsp;C. Rödenbeck,&nbsp;P. Ciais,&nbsp;N. Chandra,&nbsp;K. Wang,&nbsp;R. Janardanan,&nbsp;H. van Asperen,&nbsp;A. Bastos,&nbsp;A. van den Berg,&nbsp;A. A. Bloom,&nbsp;S. Botía,&nbsp;K. Bowman,&nbsp;J. G. Canadell,&nbsp;R. A. F. de Souza,&nbsp;C. Q. Dias-Junior,&nbsp;L. Feng,&nbsp;P. Friedlingstein,&nbsp;L. V. Gatti,&nbsp;E. Gloor,&nbsp;K. Ishijima,&nbsp;F. Jiang,&nbsp;Z. Jin,&nbsp;W. Ju,&nbsp;X. Lan,&nbsp;J. Liu,&nbsp;Z. Liu,&nbsp;T. Machida,&nbsp;S. Maksyutov,&nbsp;A. C. Manning,&nbsp;A. Martinez,&nbsp;G. A. Martins,&nbsp;K. McKain,&nbsp;J. B. Miller,&nbsp;L. Nayagam,&nbsp;Y. Niwa,&nbsp;P. I. Palmer,&nbsp;P. K. Patra,&nbsp;P. A. Pickers,&nbsp;B. Poulter,&nbsp;B. B. Stephens,&nbsp;C. Sweeney,&nbsp;S. Wofsy,&nbsp;Z. Wu,&nbsp;D. Yang,&nbsp;J. Yun,&nbsp;N. Zeng","doi":"10.1029/2025GB008779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Atmospheric inversions provide surface CO<sub>2</sub> flux estimates based on in situ observed atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> mole fractions or satellite-based column average CO<sub>2</sub> (XCO<sub>2</sub>). Here, we provide a detailed assessment of 14 atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> inversions included in the Global Carbon Budget (GCB2024). We develop tools to further assess and use these inversions in global and regional carbon cycle studies including the GCB and the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP2) initiative. We show that the global atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> growth rate and its interannual variability are reproduced well by all inversions. In contrast to bottom-up models, inversions provide carbon flux estimates directly constrained by observations. Our ensemble mean estimates of the global sinks for the period 2015–2023 are −1.41<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>±</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>0.55 PgC yr<sup>−1</sup> for the net land sink (including land-use change emissions) and −2.97<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>±</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>0.55 PgC yr<sup>−1</sup> for the global net ocean sink (uncertainties reported as <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n <mi>σ</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\pm 1\\sigma $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> across inversions; estimates include fossil fuel and river flux adjustments). On regional scales, we find significant spread in flux estimates between inversions across regions, and we present criteria and metrics to derive flux-observation relation constraints or subselect ensembles of inversions based on independent observations. Furthermore, we use the atmospheric inversions to assess the atmospheric growth rate of CO<sub>2</sub>. We show that the factor used to convert annual observation-based growth rates to net fluxes is variable over time as a result of atmospheric mixing. Finally, we propose guidelines on how to use the inverse results in global and regional carbon budget studies by the wider carbon cycle community.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"40 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025GB008779","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GB008779","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atmospheric inversions provide surface CO2 flux estimates based on in situ observed atmospheric CO2 mole fractions or satellite-based column average CO2 (XCO2). Here, we provide a detailed assessment of 14 atmospheric CO2 inversions included in the Global Carbon Budget (GCB2024). We develop tools to further assess and use these inversions in global and regional carbon cycle studies including the GCB and the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP2) initiative. We show that the global atmospheric CO2 growth rate and its interannual variability are reproduced well by all inversions. In contrast to bottom-up models, inversions provide carbon flux estimates directly constrained by observations. Our ensemble mean estimates of the global sinks for the period 2015–2023 are −1.41 ± $\pm $ 0.55 PgC yr−1 for the net land sink (including land-use change emissions) and −2.97 ± $\pm $ 0.55 PgC yr−1 for the global net ocean sink (uncertainties reported as ± 1 σ $\pm 1\sigma $ across inversions; estimates include fossil fuel and river flux adjustments). On regional scales, we find significant spread in flux estimates between inversions across regions, and we present criteria and metrics to derive flux-observation relation constraints or subselect ensembles of inversions based on independent observations. Furthermore, we use the atmospheric inversions to assess the atmospheric growth rate of CO2. We show that the factor used to convert annual observation-based growth rates to net fluxes is variable over time as a result of atmospheric mixing. Finally, we propose guidelines on how to use the inverse results in global and regional carbon budget studies by the wider carbon cycle community.

Abstract Image

从大气逆温集合看全球和区域碳收支的自上而下视角
大气逆温提供基于现场观测到的大气CO2摩尔分数或卫星柱平均CO2 (XCO2)的地表CO2通量估算。在此,我们对全球碳预算(GCB2024)中包含的14个大气CO2逆温进行了详细评估。我们开发了工具,以进一步评估和在全球和区域碳循环研究中使用这些反转,包括GCB和区域碳循环评估和过程(RECCAP2)倡议。结果表明,所有逆温都能很好地再现全球大气CO2增长率及其年际变率。与自下而上模式相比,反演提供了直接受观测约束的碳通量估计。我们对2015-2023年期间全球汇的总体平均估计为:陆地净汇(包括土地利用变化排放)为- 1.41±$\pm $ 0.55 PgC年- 1,全球海洋净汇为- 2.97±$\pm $ 0.55 PgC年- 1±1 σ $\pm 1\sigma $;估算包括化石燃料和河流流量调整)。在区域尺度上,我们发现不同区域间反演的通量估计值存在显著差异,我们提出了准则和度量来推导通量-观测关系约束或基于独立观测的反演子集。此外,我们利用大气逆温来评估大气中CO2的增长率。我们表明,由于大气混合,用于将基于观测的年增长率转换为净通量的因子随时间变化。最后,我们提出了如何在更广泛的碳循环社区的全球和区域碳预算研究中使用逆结果的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Global Biogeochemical Cycles 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书