Searching for Sustainability: Industrial Agriculture of Small Farmers in China and Its Structural Strains

IF 4.1 2区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Journal of Agrarian Change Pub Date : 2026-06-26 Epub Date: 2026-06-12 DOI:10.1111/joac.70097
Qian Forrest Zhang
{"title":"Searching for Sustainability: Industrial Agriculture of Small Farmers in China and Its Structural Strains","authors":"Qian Forrest Zhang","doi":"10.1111/joac.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ‘sustainability turn’ in China's development paradigm is in part a response to the sustainability challenges—both ecologically and socially—that China's agrarian transition has generated. This article characterizes China's agrarian system as an ‘industrial agriculture of small farmers’ (IASF): industrial in method and social metabolism, yet predominantly smallholder in scale and social organization. Over four decades, this configuration delivered national food security, inclusive livelihood improvement and accumulation without the mass dispossession characteristic of agrarian transitions elsewhere. Yet the processes driving these achievements also generated three interconnected structural strains: an ecological strain from IASF's industrial methods and the scale-biased state interventions they provoked; an infrastructure strain produced by the capitalist restructuring of conditions on which smallholder viability depends; and a demographic strain resulting from the dissolution of IASF's social reproduction foundations. Analysing seven cases of state interventions in Chinese agriculture, articles in this collection show that these efforts—despite genuine ambitions in ecological and social restoration—consistently reproduce the scale biases and class dynamics that accelerate smallholder marginalization rather than arresting it.</p>","PeriodicalId":47678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agrarian Change","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joac.70097","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agrarian Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joac.70097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ‘sustainability turn’ in China's development paradigm is in part a response to the sustainability challenges—both ecologically and socially—that China's agrarian transition has generated. This article characterizes China's agrarian system as an ‘industrial agriculture of small farmers’ (IASF): industrial in method and social metabolism, yet predominantly smallholder in scale and social organization. Over four decades, this configuration delivered national food security, inclusive livelihood improvement and accumulation without the mass dispossession characteristic of agrarian transitions elsewhere. Yet the processes driving these achievements also generated three interconnected structural strains: an ecological strain from IASF's industrial methods and the scale-biased state interventions they provoked; an infrastructure strain produced by the capitalist restructuring of conditions on which smallholder viability depends; and a demographic strain resulting from the dissolution of IASF's social reproduction foundations. Analysing seven cases of state interventions in Chinese agriculture, articles in this collection show that these efforts—despite genuine ambitions in ecological and social restoration—consistently reproduce the scale biases and class dynamics that accelerate smallholder marginalization rather than arresting it.

寻找可持续性:中国小农工厂化农业及其结构压力
中国发展模式的“可持续性转向”在一定程度上是对中国农业转型所带来的生态和社会可持续性挑战的回应。本文将中国的农业系统描述为“小农的工业化农业”(IASF):工业化的方法和社会代谢,但在规模和社会组织方面主要是小农。40多年来,这种格局实现了国家粮食安全、包容性生计改善和积累,没有出现其他地方土地转型所特有的大规模剥夺现象。然而,推动这些成就的过程也产生了三种相互关联的结构压力:一种是IASF的工业方法带来的生态压力,以及它们引发的有规模偏见的国家干预;资本主义对小农生存所依赖的条件进行重组所产生的基础设施紧张;以及由于国际会计准则理事会社会再生产基础的解体而造成的人口压力。通过分析七个国家干预中国农业的案例,本文集中的文章表明,这些努力——尽管在生态和社会恢复方面有着真正的雄心——不断地再现了规模偏见和阶级动态,这些偏见和阶级动态加速了小农的边缘化,而不是阻止了它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agrarian Change is a journal of agrarian political economy. It promotes investigation of the social relations and dynamics of production, property and power in agrarian formations and their processes of change, both historical and contemporary. It encourages work within a broad interdisciplinary framework, informed by theory, and serves as a forum for serious comparative analysis and scholarly debate. Contributions are welcomed from political economists, historians, anthropologists, sociologists, political scientists, economists, geographers, lawyers, and others committed to the rigorous study and analysis of agrarian structure and change, past and present, in different parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书