Land Carbon Sink Distribution in Northern Eurasia Is Driven by Climate Change

IF 6.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
I. Melnikova, T. Yokohata, D. Schepaschenko, S. Sitch, S. Maksyutov
{"title":"Land Carbon Sink Distribution in Northern Eurasia Is Driven by Climate Change","authors":"I. Melnikova,&nbsp;T. Yokohata,&nbsp;D. Schepaschenko,&nbsp;S. Sitch,&nbsp;S. Maksyutov","doi":"10.1029/2025GB008971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Boreal forests are a major contributor to the global land carbon sink under rising CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and a changing climate. Carbon sink estimates for Northern Eurasia from forest inventories, flux mapping, and remote sensing have moved toward convergence over the past decade, although substantial differences remain. Several bottom-up and top-down estimates exceed Russia's national greenhouse gas inventory values. Here, we combine data from four independent sources—machine-learning-based FLUXCOM, atmospheric inversion models, the TRENDY ensemble of dynamic global vegetation models, and CMIP6 Earth System Models—to assess the spatial and temporal characteristics of the Northern Eurasian net carbon sink and discuss the differences. Our multi-approach assessment yields a regional estimate of 0.47 ± 0.20 GtC year<sup>−1</sup> for the 2001–2015 period, which accounts for one-third of the global land carbon sink. CMIP6 model estimates are broadly consistent with those from other approaches, lending confidence to their future projections, although regional differences persist across individual models. We find a pronounced spatial flux gradient from south to north and west to east along a mean temperature gradient, with stronger carbon sinks in the warmer southern regions and weaker sinks in the cooler northeastern regions. Despite rapid warming in the northern parts of Northern Eurasia, CO<sub>2</sub>- and warming-induced carbon sink enhancement contributes little to the overall regional sink due to its initially low net productivity. These results underscore the importance of forest productivity in shaping the terrestrial carbon sink and provide a multi-perspective view of its evolution under continued anthropogenic forcing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12729,"journal":{"name":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","volume":"40 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025GB008971","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Biogeochemical Cycles","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GB008971","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Boreal forests are a major contributor to the global land carbon sink under rising CO2 concentrations and a changing climate. Carbon sink estimates for Northern Eurasia from forest inventories, flux mapping, and remote sensing have moved toward convergence over the past decade, although substantial differences remain. Several bottom-up and top-down estimates exceed Russia's national greenhouse gas inventory values. Here, we combine data from four independent sources—machine-learning-based FLUXCOM, atmospheric inversion models, the TRENDY ensemble of dynamic global vegetation models, and CMIP6 Earth System Models—to assess the spatial and temporal characteristics of the Northern Eurasian net carbon sink and discuss the differences. Our multi-approach assessment yields a regional estimate of 0.47 ± 0.20 GtC year−1 for the 2001–2015 period, which accounts for one-third of the global land carbon sink. CMIP6 model estimates are broadly consistent with those from other approaches, lending confidence to their future projections, although regional differences persist across individual models. We find a pronounced spatial flux gradient from south to north and west to east along a mean temperature gradient, with stronger carbon sinks in the warmer southern regions and weaker sinks in the cooler northeastern regions. Despite rapid warming in the northern parts of Northern Eurasia, CO2- and warming-induced carbon sink enhancement contributes little to the overall regional sink due to its initially low net productivity. These results underscore the importance of forest productivity in shaping the terrestrial carbon sink and provide a multi-perspective view of its evolution under continued anthropogenic forcing.

Abstract Image

气候变化对欧亚大陆北部陆地碳汇分布的影响
在二氧化碳浓度上升和气候变化的情况下,北方森林是全球陆地碳汇的主要贡献者。在过去十年中,通过森林清查、通量测绘和遥感对欧亚大陆北部的碳汇估算已趋于趋同,尽管仍存在巨大差异。几个自下而上和自上而下的估计都超过了俄罗斯的国家温室气体库存值。本文结合基于机器学习的FLUXCOM、大气反演模型、全球动态植被模型的潮流集合和CMIP6地球系统模型这四个独立来源的数据,评估了欧亚北部净碳汇的时空特征,并讨论了它们之间的差异。我们的多方法评估得出2001-2015年期间的区域估计值为0.47±0.20 GtC年−1,占全球陆地碳汇的三分之一。CMIP6模型的估计值与其他方法的估计值大致一致,为他们对未来的预测提供了信心,尽管各个模型之间存在区域差异。研究发现,在平均温度梯度上,从南到北、从西到东存在明显的空间通量梯度,南方较暖地区碳汇较强,东北较冷地区碳汇较弱。尽管欧亚大陆北部地区快速变暖,但由于其最初的净生产力较低,二氧化碳和变暖引起的碳汇增强对整个区域碳汇的贡献很小。这些结果强调了森林生产力在形成陆地碳汇方面的重要性,并提供了在持续人为强迫下其演变的多角度观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Global Biogeochemical Cycles 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Biogeochemical Cycles (GBC) features research on regional to global biogeochemical interactions, as well as more local studies that demonstrate fundamental implications for biogeochemical processing at regional or global scales. Published papers draw on a wide array of methods and knowledge and extend in time from the deep geologic past to recent historical and potential future interactions. This broad scope includes studies that elucidate human activities as interactive components of biogeochemical cycles and physical Earth Systems including climate. Authors are required to make their work accessible to a broad interdisciplinary range of scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书