Permanent nearshore sediment loss and inevitable retreat of cohesive bluff-backed beaches

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Chelsea A. Volpano, Lucas K. Zoet, J. Elmo Rawling III
{"title":"Permanent nearshore sediment loss and inevitable retreat of cohesive bluff-backed beaches","authors":"Chelsea A. Volpano,&nbsp;Lucas K. Zoet,&nbsp;J. Elmo Rawling III","doi":"10.1002/esp.70335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lake Michigan experiences decadal scale water level fluctuations that cause beaches to alternate from wide during low lake levels to narrow during high lake levels. Narrow beaches offer less protection to dunes and bluffs than wide beaches, increasing susceptibility to erosion by waves during high water levels. Bluff erosion is the main source of sediment to the nearshore in western Lake Michigan, and the perception of coastal managers is that rapid armouring of the shoreline during high lake levels reduced input of sand that typically acts as a buffer from chronic erosion. However, there are no datasets that document the sediment pathways between the onshore and nearshore at high spatial and temporal resolution, and the connections between erosion during high lake levels and buffering potential after lake levels fall remain unclear. This work used repeat surveys at two natural (unarmoured) coastal sites: a dune- and bluff-backed beach to investigate nearshore changes corresponding to shoreline erosion during high lake levels. We include two regional topobathy LiDAR datasets that bracket a period of rising lake levels between 2012 and 2020 and nine high-resolution sUAS/sonar elevation surveys during falling lake levels (2020–2023). Our data show that a nearly equivalent volume of sediment was moved out of the survey compartment at both sites during high lake levels. However, the dune-backed system regained an equal volume as lake levels fell, whereas there was a net loss at the bluff-backed site. Even during periods of high erosion, the sand fraction did not accumulate in a way that buffered against future erosion at the bluff toe. These findings contradict public perception, emphasizing the chronic nature of bluff retreat following a high-to-low lake level cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":"51 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/esp.70335","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.70335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lake Michigan experiences decadal scale water level fluctuations that cause beaches to alternate from wide during low lake levels to narrow during high lake levels. Narrow beaches offer less protection to dunes and bluffs than wide beaches, increasing susceptibility to erosion by waves during high water levels. Bluff erosion is the main source of sediment to the nearshore in western Lake Michigan, and the perception of coastal managers is that rapid armouring of the shoreline during high lake levels reduced input of sand that typically acts as a buffer from chronic erosion. However, there are no datasets that document the sediment pathways between the onshore and nearshore at high spatial and temporal resolution, and the connections between erosion during high lake levels and buffering potential after lake levels fall remain unclear. This work used repeat surveys at two natural (unarmoured) coastal sites: a dune- and bluff-backed beach to investigate nearshore changes corresponding to shoreline erosion during high lake levels. We include two regional topobathy LiDAR datasets that bracket a period of rising lake levels between 2012 and 2020 and nine high-resolution sUAS/sonar elevation surveys during falling lake levels (2020–2023). Our data show that a nearly equivalent volume of sediment was moved out of the survey compartment at both sites during high lake levels. However, the dune-backed system regained an equal volume as lake levels fell, whereas there was a net loss at the bluff-backed site. Even during periods of high erosion, the sand fraction did not accumulate in a way that buffered against future erosion at the bluff toe. These findings contradict public perception, emphasizing the chronic nature of bluff retreat following a high-to-low lake level cycle.

Abstract Image

永久的近岸沉积物损失和粘性的崖背海滩的不可避免的退缩
密歇根湖经历了年代际尺度的水位波动,导致海滩在低湖水位时从宽到高湖水位时狭窄交替。与宽阔的海滩相比,狭窄的海滩对沙丘和悬崖的保护更少,在高水位时更容易受到海浪的侵蚀。断崖侵蚀是密歇根湖西部近岸沉积物的主要来源,海岸管理者的看法是,在高水位期间,海岸线的快速装甲减少了通常作为慢性侵蚀缓冲的沙子的输入。然而,目前还没有高时空分辨率的数据集记录在岸和近岸之间的沉积物路径,而且高水位期间的侵蚀与湖泊水位下降后的缓冲潜力之间的联系仍不清楚。这项工作在两个自然(无装甲)海岸地点进行了重复调查:沙丘和崖背海滩,以调查在高水位期间与海岸线侵蚀相对应的近岸变化。我们包括了两个区域地形激光雷达数据集,涵盖了2012年至2020年期间湖泊水位上升的时期,以及2020年至2023年期间湖泊水位下降期间的9个高分辨率sUAS/声纳高程调查。我们的数据显示,在高水位期间,两个地点的沉积物从调查隔间中移出的体积几乎相等。然而,随着湖泊水位的下降,沙丘支撑的系统恢复了等量的体积,而悬崖支撑的系统则有净损失。即使在高度侵蚀的时期,沙粒也没有以某种方式积累起来,以缓冲钝趾的未来侵蚀。这些发现与公众的看法相矛盾,强调了高到低湖泊水位循环后虚张声势撤退的慢性性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书