Boundary Conditions of Retrieval-Enhanced Learning: Evidence from Contextual Learning and Retention of Second Language Multi-Word Expressions

IF 4.7 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mojtaba Tadayonifar, Mahnaz Entezari
{"title":"Boundary Conditions of Retrieval-Enhanced Learning: Evidence from Contextual Learning and Retention of Second Language Multi-Word Expressions","authors":"Mojtaba Tadayonifar, Mahnaz Entezari","doi":"10.1177/13621688261452314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research has demonstrated that retrieval practice and contextual inference are equally effective in learning and retention of first language words from reading, but their effectiveness for contextual learning of second language words has yet to be established. This study extends this line of inquiry, investigating the comparative effects of retrieval and contextual inference on contextual learning and retention of second language multi-word expressions. Eighty-five Iranian learners of English as a foreign language were randomly assigned to retrieval and contextual inference groups. The retrieval group read 28 neutral texts and were required to retrieve and write the target items while the contextual inference group read the informative texts which triggered contextual inference. Learning was measured by immediate and delayed form and meaning recall post-tests. Results of the mixed-effects regression analysis showed that contextual inference was significantly more effective than retrieval in both post-tests, suggesting potential boundary conditions of retrieval-enhanced learning from reading.","PeriodicalId":47852,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688261452314","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that retrieval practice and contextual inference are equally effective in learning and retention of first language words from reading, but their effectiveness for contextual learning of second language words has yet to be established. This study extends this line of inquiry, investigating the comparative effects of retrieval and contextual inference on contextual learning and retention of second language multi-word expressions. Eighty-five Iranian learners of English as a foreign language were randomly assigned to retrieval and contextual inference groups. The retrieval group read 28 neutral texts and were required to retrieve and write the target items while the contextual inference group read the informative texts which triggered contextual inference. Learning was measured by immediate and delayed form and meaning recall post-tests. Results of the mixed-effects regression analysis showed that contextual inference was significantly more effective than retrieval in both post-tests, suggesting potential boundary conditions of retrieval-enhanced learning from reading.
检索强化学习的边界条件:来自语境学习和二语多词表达记忆的证据
已有研究表明,检索练习和语境推理在母语词汇的学习和记忆中同样有效,但它们在第二语言词汇语境学习中的有效性尚未得到证实。本研究扩展了这一研究思路,探讨了检索和语境推理对二语多词表达的语境学习和记忆的比较效应。85名伊朗英语学习者被随机分配到检索组和上下文推断组。检索组阅读28篇中性文本,并被要求检索和写入目标项目,而语境推理组阅读触发语境推理的信息性文本。学习是通过即时和延迟形式和意义回忆后测试来衡量的。混合效应回归分析结果显示,在两项后验测试中,语境推理明显比检索更有效,提示检索增强阅读学习的潜在边界条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: Language Teaching Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research within the area of second or foreign language teaching. Although articles are written in English, the journal welcomes studies dealing with the teaching of languages other than English as well. The journal is a venue for studies that demonstrate sound research methods and which report findings that have clear pedagogical implications. A wide range of topics in the area of language teaching is covered, including: -Programme -Syllabus -Materials design -Methodology -The teaching of specific skills and language for specific purposes Thorough investigation and research ensures this journal is: -International in focus, publishing work from countries worldwide -Interdisciplinary, encouraging work which seeks to break down barriers that have isolated language teaching professionals from others concerned with pedagogy -Innovative, seeking to stimulate new avenues of enquiry, including ''action'' research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书