{"title":"Owning modernity: Indigenous architecture, fashion, and the aesthetics of modernity in La Paz and El Alto, Bolivia","authors":"Kate Maclean","doi":"10.1177/00420980261448070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how popular markets and cultural aesthetics challenge colonial binaries of tradition versus modernity, focusing on La Paz and El Alto during a period of Indigenous political power and economic expansion (2006–2019). Drawing on fieldwork and Bolivian scholarship, I show how two visible formations—Freddy Mamani’s “ <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">cholet</jats:italic> ” buildings and <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">la moda de la chola paceña</jats:italic> —enact plural, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">ch’ixi</jats:italic> modernities rather than simple incorporations of “tradition” into consumer spectacle. The trends examined demonstrate how popular aesthetic practices disrupt binaries (modern/traditional, rural/urban, gift/commerce), and demonstrate the importance of understanding the institutions which channel capital, as well as cultural dynamics and the power of confidence, shame, and recognition in shaping urban space. I also analyze the institutional reception—in Bolivia and internationally—to show how Indigenous designers reframe what counts as art, expertise, and contemporaneity. The discussion relocates debates on the “Indigenous city” to the Andes and connects them to Latin American work on plurality, livelihoods, baroque economies, and settler-colonial urbanism. Rather than reading architecture and fashion as evidence of a growing consuming middle class, I show how they organize belonging and redistribute visibility in the city on their own terms. The case invites a reworking of urban theory attuned to Indigenous economic and cultural logics and to forms of modernity and contemporaneity that are not derivative of northern trajectories.","PeriodicalId":51350,"journal":{"name":"Urban Studies","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980261448070","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article explores how popular markets and cultural aesthetics challenge colonial binaries of tradition versus modernity, focusing on La Paz and El Alto during a period of Indigenous political power and economic expansion (2006–2019). Drawing on fieldwork and Bolivian scholarship, I show how two visible formations—Freddy Mamani’s “ cholet ” buildings and la moda de la chola paceña —enact plural, ch’ixi modernities rather than simple incorporations of “tradition” into consumer spectacle. The trends examined demonstrate how popular aesthetic practices disrupt binaries (modern/traditional, rural/urban, gift/commerce), and demonstrate the importance of understanding the institutions which channel capital, as well as cultural dynamics and the power of confidence, shame, and recognition in shaping urban space. I also analyze the institutional reception—in Bolivia and internationally—to show how Indigenous designers reframe what counts as art, expertise, and contemporaneity. The discussion relocates debates on the “Indigenous city” to the Andes and connects them to Latin American work on plurality, livelihoods, baroque economies, and settler-colonial urbanism. Rather than reading architecture and fashion as evidence of a growing consuming middle class, I show how they organize belonging and redistribute visibility in the city on their own terms. The case invites a reworking of urban theory attuned to Indigenous economic and cultural logics and to forms of modernity and contemporaneity that are not derivative of northern trajectories.
本文探讨了流行市场和文化美学如何挑战传统与现代的殖民二元对立,重点关注土著政治权力和经济扩张时期(2006-2019)的拉巴斯和埃尔阿尔托。根据田野调查和玻利维亚的学术研究,我展示了两种可见的形态——弗雷迪·马马尼的“cholet”建筑和la moda de la chola paceña——是如何实现多元的、“ch’xi”的现代性,而不是简单地将“传统”融入到消费景观中。这些趋势展示了流行的审美实践如何打破二元(现代/传统、农村/城市、礼品/商业),并展示了理解引导资本的制度的重要性,以及文化动态和自信、羞耻和认可在塑造城市空间中的力量。我还分析了玻利维亚和国际上的机构接受情况,以展示本土设计师如何重新定义艺术、专业知识和当代性。讨论将关于“土著城市”的争论转移到安第斯山脉,并将其与拉丁美洲关于多元化、生计、巴洛克式经济和移民-殖民城市主义的研究联系起来。我没有把建筑和时尚解读为中产阶级消费不断增长的证据,而是展示了他们如何按照自己的方式组织归属感和重新分配城市的知名度。该案例邀请对城市理论进行重新设计,以适应当地的经济和文化逻辑,以及现代性和当代性的形式,而不是北方轨迹的衍生物。
期刊介绍:
Urban Studies was first published in 1964 to provide an international forum of social and economic contributions to the fields of urban and regional planning. Since then, the Journal has expanded to encompass the increasing range of disciplines and approaches that have been brought to bear on urban and regional problems. Contents include original articles, notes and comments, and a comprehensive book review section. Regular contributions are drawn from the fields of economics, planning, political science, statistics, geography, sociology, population studies and public administration.