Impact of great auricular nerve preservation status post parotidectomy on quality of life.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
M Shdaifat, N H Van Den Berg, P Sheahan
{"title":"Impact of great auricular nerve preservation status post parotidectomy on quality of life.","authors":"M Shdaifat, N H Van Den Berg, P Sheahan","doi":"10.1016/j.anorl.2026.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Parotidectomy is a common surgery to treat parotid neoplasms. While much discussion has been invested in complications such as facial nerve injury and Frey syndrome, outcomes arising from great auricular nerve (GAN) sacrifice are not well studied. The present study aims to investigate quality of life outcomes post-parotidectomy according to GAN preservation status.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of parotidectomy patients between 2011-2020 for benign tumours was performed. Data on quality of life (QoL) was collected through a composite questionnaire (Douleur Neuropathique 4 [DN4] and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs [LANSS]).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess patient quality of life post-parotidectomy according to GAN preservation status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the contacted patients, 76/205 (37.1%) responded. Of these, 38/76 were categorised as GAN-preserved, 34/76 as GAN-sacrificed and 4/76 were excluded as GAN status could not be ascertained. All patients were >6months post-operation. On a scale of 0-10, for pain, the mean values were 2.21/10 (GAN-sacrificed) and 1.32/10 (GAN-preserved) (P=0.645), and for numbness 4.47/10 (GAN-sacrificed), and 4.34/10 (GAN-preserved) (P=0.645). The angle of mandible was the most reported area for neuropathic sensations (42.1% (16/38) of GAN-preserved; 50.0% (17/34) of GAN-sacrificed). Tingling sensation was the most frequent sensation described. On a scale of 0-10 for effect on general QoL, the mean was 1.08/10 for GAN-preserved, and 1.62/10 GAN-sacrificed cohort (P=0.29). No statistical differences for specific QoL measures were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that GAN sacrifice is not associated with increased sensory defects and does not negatively impact on quality of life.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":48834,"journal":{"name":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anorl.2026.04.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Parotidectomy is a common surgery to treat parotid neoplasms. While much discussion has been invested in complications such as facial nerve injury and Frey syndrome, outcomes arising from great auricular nerve (GAN) sacrifice are not well studied. The present study aims to investigate quality of life outcomes post-parotidectomy according to GAN preservation status.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study of parotidectomy patients between 2011-2020 for benign tumours was performed. Data on quality of life (QoL) was collected through a composite questionnaire (Douleur Neuropathique 4 [DN4] and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs [LANSS]).

Objectives: To assess patient quality of life post-parotidectomy according to GAN preservation status.

Results: Among the contacted patients, 76/205 (37.1%) responded. Of these, 38/76 were categorised as GAN-preserved, 34/76 as GAN-sacrificed and 4/76 were excluded as GAN status could not be ascertained. All patients were >6months post-operation. On a scale of 0-10, for pain, the mean values were 2.21/10 (GAN-sacrificed) and 1.32/10 (GAN-preserved) (P=0.645), and for numbness 4.47/10 (GAN-sacrificed), and 4.34/10 (GAN-preserved) (P=0.645). The angle of mandible was the most reported area for neuropathic sensations (42.1% (16/38) of GAN-preserved; 50.0% (17/34) of GAN-sacrificed). Tingling sensation was the most frequent sensation described. On a scale of 0-10 for effect on general QoL, the mean was 1.08/10 for GAN-preserved, and 1.62/10 GAN-sacrificed cohort (P=0.29). No statistical differences for specific QoL measures were found.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that GAN sacrifice is not associated with increased sensory defects and does not negatively impact on quality of life.

Level of evidence: III.

腮腺切除术后大耳神经保存状况对生活质量的影响。
目的:腮腺切除术是治疗腮腺肿瘤的常用手术方法。虽然对面神经损伤和Frey综合征等并发症进行了大量的讨论,但对大耳神经(GAN)牺牲引起的结果却没有很好的研究。本研究旨在探讨甲状腺素保存状况对腮腺切除术后生活质量的影响。材料与方法:对2011-2020年良性肿瘤腮腺切除术患者进行横断面研究。通过综合问卷(Douleur neuropathque 4 [DN4]和Leeds Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs [LANSS])收集生活质量(QoL)数据。目的:根据GAN保存情况评价腮腺切除术后患者的生活质量。结果:在接触的患者中,76/205(37.1%)有应答。其中,38/76被归类为GAN保存,34/76被归类为GAN牺牲,4/76被排除,因为无法确定GAN状态。所有患者术后6个月均为bbb。在0-10的评分范围内,疼痛的平均值为2.21/10 (gan牺牲)和1.32/10 (gan保留)(P=0.645),麻木的平均值为4.47/10 (gan牺牲)和4.34/10 (gan保留)(P=0.645)。下颌角是神经病变感觉最多的区域(42.1% (16/38));50.0% (17/34) gan牺牲)。刺痛感是最常被描述的感觉。在0-10的总体生活质量影响量表上,gan保存组的平均值为1.08/10,gan牺牲组的平均值为1.62/10 (P=0.29)。在具体的生活质量测量中没有发现统计学差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,氮化镓牺牲与感官缺陷的增加无关,也不会对生活质量产生负面影响。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
28.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
12 days
期刊介绍: European Annals of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck diseases heir of one of the oldest otorhinolaryngology journals in Europe is the official organ of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SFORL) and the the International Francophone Society of Otorhinolaryngology (SIFORL). Today six annual issues provide original peer reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches and review articles giving most up-to-date insights in all areas of otology, laryngology rhinology, head and neck surgery. The European Annals also publish the SFORL guidelines and recommendations.The journal is a unique two-armed publication: the European Annals (ANORL) is an English language well referenced online journal (e-only) whereas the Annales Françaises d’ORL (AFORL), mail-order paper and online edition in French language are aimed at the French-speaking community. French language teams must submit their articles in French to the AFORL site. Federating journal in its field, the European Annals has an Editorial board of experts with international reputation that allow to make an important contribution to communication on new research data and clinical practice by publishing high-quality articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书