Vascular Endocrine-Disrupting Effects of Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S on Human Umbilical Artery.

IF 4.6 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Fatima Abrantes-Soares, Mariana Marques Santos, Melissa Mariana, Margarida Lorigo, Elisa Cairrao
{"title":"Vascular Endocrine-Disrupting Effects of Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S on Human Umbilical Artery.","authors":"Fatima Abrantes-Soares, Mariana Marques Santos, Melissa Mariana, Margarida Lorigo, Elisa Cairrao","doi":"10.3390/jox16030111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS) have been used in several everyday products to replace bisphenol A (BPA), since exposure to BPA has been associated with the development of several pathologies. However, recent studies have also been associating exposure to BPA substitutes with the development of various pathologies, including cardiovascular diseases, and the safety of BPA substitutes for human health has been questioned. Thus, this study aimed to investigate and compare BPA, BPF and BPS effects on arterial tone and to explore the mechanisms involved. The results suggest that BPA, BPS and BPF exert non-genomic and endothelium-independent relaxant effects on arteries and smooth muscle cells from the umbilical cord. Regarding genomic effects, the results suggest that BPA, BPF, and BPS disrupted the primary mechanisms underlying HUA relaxation by interfering with the cGMP signaling pathway and modulating the Ca<sup>2+</sup> channels activity. Moreover, these results suggest that BPF alters the vasorelaxant response more than BPA and BPS. Therefore, replacing BPA with its substitutes does not appear to be beneficial for human cardiovascular health. Thus, in the future, the vascular effects of these bisphenols should be further evaluated to clarify their modes of action and future implications for maternal-fetal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":42356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Xenobiotics","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13300960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Xenobiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jox16030111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS) have been used in several everyday products to replace bisphenol A (BPA), since exposure to BPA has been associated with the development of several pathologies. However, recent studies have also been associating exposure to BPA substitutes with the development of various pathologies, including cardiovascular diseases, and the safety of BPA substitutes for human health has been questioned. Thus, this study aimed to investigate and compare BPA, BPF and BPS effects on arterial tone and to explore the mechanisms involved. The results suggest that BPA, BPS and BPF exert non-genomic and endothelium-independent relaxant effects on arteries and smooth muscle cells from the umbilical cord. Regarding genomic effects, the results suggest that BPA, BPF, and BPS disrupted the primary mechanisms underlying HUA relaxation by interfering with the cGMP signaling pathway and modulating the Ca2+ channels activity. Moreover, these results suggest that BPF alters the vasorelaxant response more than BPA and BPS. Therefore, replacing BPA with its substitutes does not appear to be beneficial for human cardiovascular health. Thus, in the future, the vascular effects of these bisphenols should be further evaluated to clarify their modes of action and future implications for maternal-fetal health.

双酚F和双酚S对人脐动脉血管内分泌的干扰作用。
近年来,双酚F (BPF)和双酚S (BPS)已被用于一些日常用品中以取代双酚A (BPA),因为暴露于BPA与几种疾病的发展有关。然而,最近的研究也将双酚a替代品与包括心血管疾病在内的各种疾病的发展联系起来,双酚a替代品对人体健康的安全性受到质疑。因此,本研究旨在研究和比较BPA、BPF和BPS对动脉张力的影响,并探讨其机制。结果表明,BPA、BPS和BPF对脐带动脉和平滑肌细胞具有非基因组和内皮独立的松弛作用。关于基因组效应,研究结果表明BPA、BPF和BPS通过干扰cGMP信号通路和调节Ca2+通道活性破坏了HUA松弛的主要机制。此外,这些结果表明BPF比BPA和BPS更能改变血管松弛反应。因此,用它的替代品代替双酚a似乎对人类心血管健康没有好处。因此,在未来,应进一步评估这些双酚类物质对血管的影响,以阐明它们的作用模式和未来对母胎健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Xenobiotics publishes original studies concerning the beneficial (pharmacology) and detrimental effects (toxicology) of xenobiotics in all organisms. A xenobiotic (“stranger to life”) is defined as a chemical that is not usually found at significant concentrations or expected to reside for long periods in organisms. In addition to man-made chemicals, natural products could also be of interest if they have potent biological properties, special medicinal properties or that a given organism is at risk of exposure in the environment. Topics dealing with abiotic- and biotic-based transformations in various media (xenobiochemistry) and environmental toxicology are also of interest. Areas of interests include the identification of key physical and chemical properties of molecules that predict biological effects and persistence in the environment; the molecular mode of action of xenobiotics; biochemical and physiological interactions leading to change in organism health; pathophysiological interactions of natural and synthetic chemicals; development of biochemical indicators including new “-omics” approaches to identify biomarkers of exposure or effects for xenobiotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书