Bridging the Rural-Urban Divide: Independent Pharmacies and Women's Contraceptive Access.

IF 2.2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2026-05-30 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy14030081
Amie M Ashcraft, Anthony Peluso, Taylor Thompson, Amy Brenwalt, Sidney Sisson, Melody Phillips, Courtney S Pilkerton, Charles D Ponte
{"title":"Bridging the Rural-Urban Divide: Independent Pharmacies and Women's Contraceptive Access.","authors":"Amie M Ashcraft, Anthony Peluso, Taylor Thompson, Amy Brenwalt, Sidney Sisson, Melody Phillips, Courtney S Pilkerton, Charles D Ponte","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy14030081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Independent community pharmacies serve as critical healthcare access points in rural areas, yet they consistently underperform chain pharmacies on contraceptive access measures. This narrative commentary draws on mystery caller studies, implementation research, and policy analyses to examine pharmacy-based contraceptive access in the United States (US). Using emergency contraception (EC) as a case study, we show that independent pharmacies stock EC at dramatically lower rates than chains (e.g., 14.6% vs. 76.3% in West Virginia), provide less accurate information about purchase requirements and timing, and impose more barriers to access. Because independent pharmacies account for 76.5% of pharmacies in rural areas, this disparity concentrates contraceptive inaccessibility in communities already facing the highest rates of unintended pregnancy, maternal mortality, and maternity care deserts. This pattern extends beyond EC to pharmacist-prescribed contraception and over-the-counter daily oral contraceptives. These disparities reflect systemic barriers, such as inadequate reimbursement, limited training infrastructure, and absence of corporate support, rather than failures of individual pharmacies. Drawing on implementation research and the success of West Virginia's COVID-19 vaccination model, this paper proposes coordinated, sector-specific strategies to transform independent pharmacies from barriers into bridges for rural women's contraceptive access.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13306805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy14030081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Independent community pharmacies serve as critical healthcare access points in rural areas, yet they consistently underperform chain pharmacies on contraceptive access measures. This narrative commentary draws on mystery caller studies, implementation research, and policy analyses to examine pharmacy-based contraceptive access in the United States (US). Using emergency contraception (EC) as a case study, we show that independent pharmacies stock EC at dramatically lower rates than chains (e.g., 14.6% vs. 76.3% in West Virginia), provide less accurate information about purchase requirements and timing, and impose more barriers to access. Because independent pharmacies account for 76.5% of pharmacies in rural areas, this disparity concentrates contraceptive inaccessibility in communities already facing the highest rates of unintended pregnancy, maternal mortality, and maternity care deserts. This pattern extends beyond EC to pharmacist-prescribed contraception and over-the-counter daily oral contraceptives. These disparities reflect systemic barriers, such as inadequate reimbursement, limited training infrastructure, and absence of corporate support, rather than failures of individual pharmacies. Drawing on implementation research and the success of West Virginia's COVID-19 vaccination model, this paper proposes coordinated, sector-specific strategies to transform independent pharmacies from barriers into bridges for rural women's contraceptive access.

弥合城乡差距:独立药房和妇女获得避孕药具。
独立的社区药店是农村地区重要的医疗保健接入点,但在避孕措施方面,它们的表现一直不如连锁药店。这篇叙述性评论借鉴了神秘来电者研究、实施研究和政策分析,以检查美国基于药物的避孕药具获取情况。以紧急避孕药(EC)为例,我们发现独立药店的EC库存率明显低于连锁药店(例如,14.6% vs.西弗吉尼亚州的76.3%),提供的购买要求和时间信息不太准确,并且对获取设置了更多障碍。由于独立药店占农村地区药店的76.5%,这一差距使避孕药具难以获得集中在已经面临最高意外怀孕率、孕产妇死亡率和孕产妇保健沙漠的社区。这种模式从欧共体扩展到药剂师开的避孕药和非处方的每日口服避孕药。这些差异反映了系统性障碍,如报销不足、培训基础设施有限、缺乏企业支持,而不是个别药店的失败。根据实施研究和西弗吉尼亚州COVID-19疫苗接种模式的成功经验,本文提出了协调一致的针对特定部门的战略,将独立药店从障碍转变为农村妇女获得避孕药具的桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书