Outcomes of Curative Esophagectomy in Octogenarians vs. Non-Octogenarians with Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.4 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Liyang Xiao, Kai Siang Chan, Isaac Chan, Aung Myint Oo
{"title":"Outcomes of Curative Esophagectomy in Octogenarians vs. Non-Octogenarians with Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Liyang Xiao, Kai Siang Chan, Isaac Chan, Aung Myint Oo","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics11030067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Esophageal cancer (EC) poses a growing global challenge in the context of an ageing population. Evidence on the role of curative esophagectomy in octogenarians is limited. This study aims to compare the long-term survival and post-operative mortality and morbidity in octogenarians undergoing curative esophagectomy for EC with those in non-octogenarians. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to Jan 2026. The inclusion criteria were studies that compared outcomes of esophagectomy for EC between octogenarians and non-octogenarians. Exclusion criteria were single-arm studies and studies using different age cut-offs. <b>Results</b>: There were 18 studies with 73,776 patients (octogenarians <i>n</i> = 6234 and non-octogenarians patients <i>n</i> = 67,542), with smaller subsets of studies being analysed for individual outcomes. The overall incidence of open esophagectomy and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) were 78.4% (<i>n</i> = 459/585) and 21.2% (<i>n</i> = 124/585), respectively, in octogenarians, and 69.8% (<i>n</i> = 3270/4688) and 29.4% (<i>n</i> = 1380/4688), respectively, in non-octogenarians. R0 resection was achieved in 85.2% (<i>n</i> = 1759/2064) of octogenarians and 91.9% (<i>n</i> = 30,764/33,480) of non-octogenarians. Pooled OS was inferior in the octogenarian group compared to the non-octogenarian group (<i>n</i> = 35,441, HR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.38-3.79). Pooled in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality and 90-day mortality were higher in octogenarians. In terms of post-operative complications, pooled analysis demonstrated a higher overall complication rate in the octogenarian group (<i>n</i> = 6515, OR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.11-1.78), while rates of anastomosis leakage, chylothorax, respiratory complication, surgical site infection and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury were comparable between the two groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: Curative esophagectomy for EC is associated with worse overall survival, mortality and overall post-operative complication rate in octogenarians than non-octogenarians. Further research on the role of MIE in octogenarians should be conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13299997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics11030067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) poses a growing global challenge in the context of an ageing population. Evidence on the role of curative esophagectomy in octogenarians is limited. This study aims to compare the long-term survival and post-operative mortality and morbidity in octogenarians undergoing curative esophagectomy for EC with those in non-octogenarians. Methods: A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to Jan 2026. The inclusion criteria were studies that compared outcomes of esophagectomy for EC between octogenarians and non-octogenarians. Exclusion criteria were single-arm studies and studies using different age cut-offs. Results: There were 18 studies with 73,776 patients (octogenarians n = 6234 and non-octogenarians patients n = 67,542), with smaller subsets of studies being analysed for individual outcomes. The overall incidence of open esophagectomy and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) were 78.4% (n = 459/585) and 21.2% (n = 124/585), respectively, in octogenarians, and 69.8% (n = 3270/4688) and 29.4% (n = 1380/4688), respectively, in non-octogenarians. R0 resection was achieved in 85.2% (n = 1759/2064) of octogenarians and 91.9% (n = 30,764/33,480) of non-octogenarians. Pooled OS was inferior in the octogenarian group compared to the non-octogenarian group (n = 35,441, HR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.38-3.79). Pooled in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality and 90-day mortality were higher in octogenarians. In terms of post-operative complications, pooled analysis demonstrated a higher overall complication rate in the octogenarian group (n = 6515, OR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.11-1.78), while rates of anastomosis leakage, chylothorax, respiratory complication, surgical site infection and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: Curative esophagectomy for EC is associated with worse overall survival, mortality and overall post-operative complication rate in octogenarians than non-octogenarians. Further research on the role of MIE in octogenarians should be conducted.

食管癌八十多岁患者与非八十多岁患者行食管癌根治性食管切除术的疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:在人口老龄化的背景下,食管癌(EC)是一个日益严峻的全球性挑战。关于食管癌切除术在八十多岁患者中的治疗作用的证据有限。本研究的目的是比较80多岁的食管切除术治疗EC患者与非80多岁患者的长期生存率、术后死亡率和发病率。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,检索截止至2026年1月。纳入标准是比较80多岁和非80多岁患者食管癌切除术结果的研究。排除标准为单组研究和使用不同年龄截断的研究。结果:共有18项研究,73776例患者(80岁患者n = 6234例,非80岁患者n = 67542例),对更小的研究子集进行了个体结果分析。80岁以上人群中开放式食管切除术和微创食管切除术(MIE)的总发生率分别为78.4% (n = 459/585)和21.2% (n = 124/585),非80岁人群中分别为69.8% (n = 3270/4688)和29.4% (n = 1380/4688)。85.2% (n = 1759/2064)的八十多岁老人和91.9% (n = 30764 / 33480)的非八十多岁老人实现了R0切除。与非80岁组相比,80岁组的合并OS较差(n = 35,441, HR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.38-3.79)。80多岁老人的住院总死亡率、30天死亡率和90天死亡率较高。术后并发症方面,合并分析显示,80岁组总并发症发生率较高(n = 6515, OR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.11-1.78),两组吻合口漏、乳糜胸、呼吸并发症、手术部位感染、喉返神经损伤发生率相当。结论:八十多岁的食管切除术治疗EC患者的总生存率、死亡率和术后并发症发生率均低于非八十多岁的患者。对MIE在80岁老人中的作用有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书