Breaking the Vicious Cycle? A Systematic Review of Interventions Targeting Both Falls and Fear of Falling in Older Adults.

IF 2.4 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Asiye Tuba Ozdogar, Pervin Yesiloglu, Yuval Levitan Marcus, Alon Kalron
{"title":"Breaking the Vicious Cycle? A Systematic Review of Interventions Targeting Both Falls and Fear of Falling in Older Adults.","authors":"Asiye Tuba Ozdogar, Pervin Yesiloglu, Yuval Levitan Marcus, Alon Kalron","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics11030072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Falls and fall-related injuries are common in older adults and are frequently accompanied by fear of falling (FoF), which may lead to activity avoidance and functional decline. Because many interventions target falls or FoF in isolation, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to identify, describe, and evaluate interventions reporting both falls and FoF outcomes in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251113137) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 4 November 2025. Eligible studies were English-language RCTs that included adults aged ≥60 years, evaluated nonpharmacological interventions, and reported both FoF and falls. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for FoF (Hedges g), and Bayesian random-effects binomial meta-analyses were conducted for falls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten RCTs published between 1998 and 2018 (sample sizes per trial: <i>n</i> = 27-540) were included. Interventions included cognitive-behavioral therapy-based programs, Tai Chi, physiotherapist-led strength and balance training, computerized visual feedback, and video-guided home exercise. PEDro scores ranged from 6 to 9 (mean, 7.7). Pooled analyses showed no significant effect on FoF at the end of intervention (g = -0.20, 95% CI -1.45 to 1.05; <i>p</i> = 0.68; high heterogeneity) or at follow-up (g = -0.14, 95% CI -0.60 to 0.33; <i>p</i> = 0.50). For falls, postintervention evidence favored the null (BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.16; pooled estimate -0.01, 95% credible interval [CrI] -0.30 to 0.14). Follow-up results were inconclusive (BF<sub>10</sub> = 2.07; pooled CrI -0.56 to 0.00), with substantial uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across RCTs that measured both outcomes, interventions did not consistently improve both FoF and falls outcomes. These findings may suggest a partial dissociation between psychological and physical fall-related outcomes, highlighting the need for integrated, adequately powered trials that utilize standardized measures and longer follow-up periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13299663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics11030072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Falls and fall-related injuries are common in older adults and are frequently accompanied by fear of falling (FoF), which may lead to activity avoidance and functional decline. Because many interventions target falls or FoF in isolation, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to identify, describe, and evaluate interventions reporting both falls and FoF outcomes in older adults.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251113137) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 4 November 2025. Eligible studies were English-language RCTs that included adults aged ≥60 years, evaluated nonpharmacological interventions, and reported both FoF and falls. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for FoF (Hedges g), and Bayesian random-effects binomial meta-analyses were conducted for falls.

Results: Ten RCTs published between 1998 and 2018 (sample sizes per trial: n = 27-540) were included. Interventions included cognitive-behavioral therapy-based programs, Tai Chi, physiotherapist-led strength and balance training, computerized visual feedback, and video-guided home exercise. PEDro scores ranged from 6 to 9 (mean, 7.7). Pooled analyses showed no significant effect on FoF at the end of intervention (g = -0.20, 95% CI -1.45 to 1.05; p = 0.68; high heterogeneity) or at follow-up (g = -0.14, 95% CI -0.60 to 0.33; p = 0.50). For falls, postintervention evidence favored the null (BF10 = 0.16; pooled estimate -0.01, 95% credible interval [CrI] -0.30 to 0.14). Follow-up results were inconclusive (BF10 = 2.07; pooled CrI -0.56 to 0.00), with substantial uncertainty.

Conclusions: Across RCTs that measured both outcomes, interventions did not consistently improve both FoF and falls outcomes. These findings may suggest a partial dissociation between psychological and physical fall-related outcomes, highlighting the need for integrated, adequately powered trials that utilize standardized measures and longer follow-up periods.

打破恶性循环?针对老年人跌倒和害怕跌倒的干预措施的系统综述。
背景:跌倒和跌倒相关损伤在老年人中很常见,经常伴有跌倒恐惧(FoF),这可能导致活动逃避和功能下降。由于许多干预措施单独针对跌倒或FoF,我们对随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以确定、描述和评估报告老年人跌倒和FoF结果的干预措施。方法:本系统评价和荟萃分析在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251113137),并按照PRISMA指南进行。PubMed, Embase和Web of Science从创立到2025年11月4日被检索。符合条件的研究是英语随机对照试验,包括年龄≥60岁的成年人,评估非药物干预措施,并报告FoF和跌倒。采用PEDro量表评估方法学质量。对FoF进行随机效应荟萃分析(Hedges g),对跌倒进行贝叶斯随机效应二项荟萃分析。结果:纳入1998年至2018年间发表的10项随机对照试验(每个试验样本量:n = 27-540)。干预措施包括基于认知行为疗法的项目、太极拳、物理治疗师指导的力量和平衡训练、计算机视觉反馈和视频指导的家庭锻炼。PEDro评分范围从6到9(平均7.7)。合并分析显示,在干预结束时(g = -0.20, 95% CI -1.45至1.05;p = 0.68;高度异质性)或随访时(g = -0.14, 95% CI -0.60至0.33;p = 0.50), FoF无显著影响。对于跌倒,干预后的证据倾向于零(BF10 = 0.16;合并估计-0.01,95%可信区间[CrI] -0.30至0.14)。随访结果不确定(BF10 = 2.07;合并CrI -0.56 ~ 0.00),具有很大的不确定性。结论:在测量两种结果的随机对照试验中,干预措施并没有持续改善FoF和跌倒的结果。这些发现可能表明心理和生理跌倒相关结果之间存在部分分离,强调需要采用标准化措施和更长随访期的综合、充分有力的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书