Particle swarm optimization for preference rankings

IF 2.1 4区 计算机科学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Maurizio Romano, Claudio Conversano, Roberta Siciliano, Antonio D’Ambrosio
{"title":"Particle swarm optimization for preference rankings","authors":"Maurizio Romano,&nbsp;Claudio Conversano,&nbsp;Roberta Siciliano,&nbsp;Antonio D’Ambrosio","doi":"10.1007/s11634-025-00626-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Preference learning, or the analysis of preference rankings, is gaining more and more importance in various scientific disciplines. Preference learning methods allow predicting preferences on a set of alternatives. The ingredients are a pool of evaluators and a set of objects or items to be ranked in order of preference. The rank aggregation problem must be solved in order to aggregate preferences or rankings with the aim to find a consensus or collective decision. Branch-and-bound-like procedures are usable up to problems involving a relatively small number of objects, say less than 200. When the number of items becomes very large, the rank aggregation problem becomes increasingly difficult to approach so that it is universally recognized as an NP-hard problem. Several heuristic methods have been proposed to provide increasingly accurate solutions. These assume the Kemeny axiomatic approach that better deals with tied rankings. In this paper, we adopt a strategy based on Particle Swarm Optimization by adapting procedures born to solve optimization problems in continuous spaces to discrete combinatorial optimization problems. A simulation study shows the performance of the proposed algorithm in a controlled environment. A benchmarking complex data set and two real world data sets with large number of items are considered. As a result, the proposed algorithm provides significant savings in computational time and comparable accuracy with respect to other recent algorithms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49270,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification","volume":"20 2","pages":"551 - 575"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11634-025-00626-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11634-025-00626-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preference learning, or the analysis of preference rankings, is gaining more and more importance in various scientific disciplines. Preference learning methods allow predicting preferences on a set of alternatives. The ingredients are a pool of evaluators and a set of objects or items to be ranked in order of preference. The rank aggregation problem must be solved in order to aggregate preferences or rankings with the aim to find a consensus or collective decision. Branch-and-bound-like procedures are usable up to problems involving a relatively small number of objects, say less than 200. When the number of items becomes very large, the rank aggregation problem becomes increasingly difficult to approach so that it is universally recognized as an NP-hard problem. Several heuristic methods have been proposed to provide increasingly accurate solutions. These assume the Kemeny axiomatic approach that better deals with tied rankings. In this paper, we adopt a strategy based on Particle Swarm Optimization by adapting procedures born to solve optimization problems in continuous spaces to discrete combinatorial optimization problems. A simulation study shows the performance of the proposed algorithm in a controlled environment. A benchmarking complex data set and two real world data sets with large number of items are considered. As a result, the proposed algorithm provides significant savings in computational time and comparable accuracy with respect to other recent algorithms.

Abstract Image

偏好排序的粒子群优化
偏好学习或偏好排序分析在各个科学学科中越来越受到重视。偏好学习方法允许预测一组选择的偏好。成分是一组评估者和一组要按偏好排序的对象或项目。必须解决排名聚合问题,以便将偏好或排名聚合起来,以找到共识或集体决策。类似分支绑定的程序在涉及相对较少的对象(比如少于200个)的问题中是可用的。当项目数量变得非常大时,排序聚合问题变得越来越难以接近,因此它被普遍认为是np困难问题。已经提出了几种启发式方法来提供越来越精确的解决方案。这些假设采用了凯梅尼公理方法,可以更好地处理并列排名。在本文中,我们采用了基于粒子群优化的策略,将解决连续空间中的优化问题的过程应用于离散组合优化问题。仿真研究表明了该算法在受控环境下的性能。一个基准测试复杂数据集和两个具有大量项目的真实世界数据集被考虑。因此,与其他最近的算法相比,所提出的算法在计算时间和精度方面提供了显着的节省。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal Advances in Data Analysis and Classification (ADAC) is designed as a forum for high standard publications on research and applications concerning the extraction of knowable aspects from many types of data. It publishes articles on such topics as structural, quantitative, or statistical approaches for the analysis of data; advances in classification, clustering, and pattern recognition methods; strategies for modeling complex data and mining large data sets; methods for the extraction of knowledge from data, and applications of advanced methods in specific domains of practice. Articles illustrate how new domain-specific knowledge can be made available from data by skillful use of data analysis methods. The journal also publishes survey papers that outline, and illuminate the basic ideas and techniques of special approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书