Nursing in Capitalist Healthcare: The Ethical Dichotomy Between the Vocation of Nursing and the Healthcare-Industrial Complex.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Norman Jigs Quiñones
{"title":"Nursing in Capitalist Healthcare: The Ethical Dichotomy Between the Vocation of Nursing and the Healthcare-Industrial Complex.","authors":"Norman Jigs Quiñones","doi":"10.1111/nup.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nursing is a profession grounded in a vocation of caring, altruism and moral responsibility. However, contemporary nursing practice occurs largely within a healthcare system structured by neoliberal, productivity-driven imperatives-commonly described as the healthcare-industrial complex. As market-oriented logics continue to shape healthcare delivery and access to care, tensions emerge between the moral foundations of nursing and the economic rationalities that govern healthcare institutions. This paper presents a philosophical analysis of the bioethical contradictions that nurses experience in practising within the healthcare-industrial complex. Drawing on bioethical principles, nursing ethics and critical social theory, the analysis examines how neoliberal healthcare structures create moral distress, ethical dissonance and constrained moral agency among nurses. This paper argues that nurses' ethical struggle is not a failure of professional integrity but a predictable outcome of structural forces that compel participation in systems that are misaligned with nursing's moral commitments. By elucidating these dynamics, this analysis offers a conceptual framework for understanding nurse moral distress and identifies pathways for ethical agency, resistance and professional advocacy within contemporary healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":"27 3","pages":"e70094"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13290111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.70094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nursing is a profession grounded in a vocation of caring, altruism and moral responsibility. However, contemporary nursing practice occurs largely within a healthcare system structured by neoliberal, productivity-driven imperatives-commonly described as the healthcare-industrial complex. As market-oriented logics continue to shape healthcare delivery and access to care, tensions emerge between the moral foundations of nursing and the economic rationalities that govern healthcare institutions. This paper presents a philosophical analysis of the bioethical contradictions that nurses experience in practising within the healthcare-industrial complex. Drawing on bioethical principles, nursing ethics and critical social theory, the analysis examines how neoliberal healthcare structures create moral distress, ethical dissonance and constrained moral agency among nurses. This paper argues that nurses' ethical struggle is not a failure of professional integrity but a predictable outcome of structural forces that compel participation in systems that are misaligned with nursing's moral commitments. By elucidating these dynamics, this analysis offers a conceptual framework for understanding nurse moral distress and identifies pathways for ethical agency, resistance and professional advocacy within contemporary healthcare.

资本主义医疗保健中的护理:护理职业与医疗保健工业复合体之间的伦理二分法。
护理是一种以关怀、利他和道德责任为基础的职业。然而,当代护理实践主要发生在一个由新自由主义、生产力驱动的命令(通常被描述为医疗保健工业综合体)构成的医疗保健系统中。随着以市场为导向的逻辑继续塑造医疗保健服务和获得护理的机会,护理的道德基础与管理医疗机构的经济理性之间出现了紧张关系。本文提出了一个哲学分析的生物伦理矛盾,护士在实践经验的医疗保健产业综合体。利用生物伦理原则,护理伦理和批判社会理论,分析研究了新自由主义医疗结构如何在护士中创造道德困境,道德失调和约束道德代理。本文认为,护士的道德斗争不是职业操守的失败,而是结构性力量的可预测结果,这些力量迫使参与与护理道德承诺不一致的系统。通过阐明这些动态,本分析为理解护士道德困境提供了一个概念框架,并确定了当代医疗保健中道德代理、抵抗和专业倡导的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Philosophy provides a forum for discussion of philosophical issues in nursing. These focus on questions relating to the nature of nursing and to the phenomena of key relevance to it. For example, any understanding of what nursing is presupposes some conception of just what nurses are trying to do when they nurse. But what are the ends of nursing? Are they to promote health, prevent disease, promote well-being, enhance autonomy, relieve suffering, or some combination of these? How are these ends are to be met? What kind of knowledge is needed in order to nurse? Practical, theoretical, aesthetic, moral, political, ''intuitive'' or some other? Papers that explore other aspects of philosophical enquiry and analysis of relevance to nursing (and any other healthcare or social care activity) are also welcome and might include, but not be limited to, critical discussions of the work of nurse theorists who have advanced philosophical claims (e.g., Benner, Benner and Wrubel, Carper, Schrok, Watson, Parse and so on) as well as critical engagement with philosophers (e.g., Heidegger, Husserl, Kuhn, Polanyi, Taylor, MacIntyre and so on) whose work informs health care in general and nursing in particular.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书