Mobility measures and waking-day movement behaviour composition among older adults: a compositional data analysis of the McMaster Monitoring My Mobility study.

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Shawn Hakimi, Renata Kirkwood, Stuart M Phillips, Rong Zheng, Marla K Beauchamp
{"title":"Mobility measures and waking-day movement behaviour composition among older adults: a compositional data analysis of the McMaster Monitoring My Mobility study.","authors":"Shawn Hakimi, Renata Kirkwood, Stuart M Phillips, Rong Zheng, Marla K Beauchamp","doi":"10.1186/s12966-026-01939-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobility is a cornerstone of healthy ageing typically assessed using self-report and performance-based measures. Recent research suggests these measures are poor proxies for real-world mobility. Device-derived measures of real-world mobility reflect the relative proportions of time a person allocates to sedentary behaviour (SB), light-intensity physical activity (LIPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) that together form the waking-day movement behaviour composition. The aim of this study was to examine the associations between commonly used mobility measures and the waking-day movement behaviour composition in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis of data from over 1200 older adults ≥ 65 years of age from the baseline cohort (2022-2024) of the McMaster Monitoring My Mobility (MacM3) study was conducted. Compositional data analysis was used to examine the associations between 6 self-report and 10 performance-based measures of mobility and multiple components of the waking-day movement behaviour composition and establish differences in movement behaviours according to different levels of mobility. Examples of included measures are the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) and Timed Up and Go (TUG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1227 older adults (73.6 ± 5.3 years) were analysed. Significant differences in waking-day movement behaviour composition were found across the self-report and performance-based mobility measures. Older adults with lower mobility accumulated more SB and less MVPA throughout the day. For example, those with poorer TUG performance accumulated 34 more minutes/day of SB, and 22 min/day less of MVPA compared to those with better performance. The PASE, 400-meter walk, and fast gait speed tests were the strongest indicators of real-world mobility; however, the effect sizes were small. No measure showed a significant association with LIPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Traditional self-report and performance-based measures of mobility are associated with the waking-day movement behaviour composition in older adults; however, their ability to explain real-world mobility is limited and varies across measures. The lack of association between any of the measures and LIPA is surprising, given that older adults spend most of their time in this activity intensity. These findings challenge the widespread use of traditional mobility measures to make inferences about real-world mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":50336,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-026-01939-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mobility is a cornerstone of healthy ageing typically assessed using self-report and performance-based measures. Recent research suggests these measures are poor proxies for real-world mobility. Device-derived measures of real-world mobility reflect the relative proportions of time a person allocates to sedentary behaviour (SB), light-intensity physical activity (LIPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) that together form the waking-day movement behaviour composition. The aim of this study was to examine the associations between commonly used mobility measures and the waking-day movement behaviour composition in older adults.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of data from over 1200 older adults ≥ 65 years of age from the baseline cohort (2022-2024) of the McMaster Monitoring My Mobility (MacM3) study was conducted. Compositional data analysis was used to examine the associations between 6 self-report and 10 performance-based measures of mobility and multiple components of the waking-day movement behaviour composition and establish differences in movement behaviours according to different levels of mobility. Examples of included measures are the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) and Timed Up and Go (TUG).

Results: Data from 1227 older adults (73.6 ± 5.3 years) were analysed. Significant differences in waking-day movement behaviour composition were found across the self-report and performance-based mobility measures. Older adults with lower mobility accumulated more SB and less MVPA throughout the day. For example, those with poorer TUG performance accumulated 34 more minutes/day of SB, and 22 min/day less of MVPA compared to those with better performance. The PASE, 400-meter walk, and fast gait speed tests were the strongest indicators of real-world mobility; however, the effect sizes were small. No measure showed a significant association with LIPA.

Conclusions: Traditional self-report and performance-based measures of mobility are associated with the waking-day movement behaviour composition in older adults; however, their ability to explain real-world mobility is limited and varies across measures. The lack of association between any of the measures and LIPA is surprising, given that older adults spend most of their time in this activity intensity. These findings challenge the widespread use of traditional mobility measures to make inferences about real-world mobility.

老年人的活动测量和清醒-日间运动行为组成:麦克马斯特监测我的活动研究的组成数据分析。
背景:行动能力是健康老龄化的基石,通常采用自我报告和基于绩效的措施进行评估。最近的研究表明,这些指标并不能很好地反映现实世界的流动性。设备衍生的现实世界活动测量反映了一个人分配给久坐行为(SB)、轻强度身体活动(LIPA)和中高强度身体活动(MVPA)的时间的相对比例,这些时间共同构成了醒着的一天的运动行为构成。本研究的目的是检查老年人常用的活动措施与清醒时的运动行为构成之间的关系。方法:对麦克马斯特监测我的活动能力(MacM3)研究的基线队列(2022-2024)中1200多名年龄≥65岁的老年人的数据进行横断面分析。使用成分数据分析来检验6项自我报告和10项基于表现的活动测量指标与醒着-白天活动行为组成的多个组成部分之间的关联,并根据不同的活动水平确定运动行为的差异。包括的措施的例子是老年人体力活动量表(PASE)和计时上升和走(TUG)。结果:分析了1227例老年人(73.6±5.3岁)的数据。在自我报告和基于表现的活动测量中发现,醒着时的活动行为构成存在显著差异。活动能力较低的老年人全天累积较多的SB和较少的MVPA。例如,与表现较好的人相比,TUG表现较差的人每天累积的SB多34分钟,MVPA少22分钟。PASE、400米步行和快速步态速度测试是真实世界活动能力的最强指标;然而,效应量很小。没有测量显示与LIPA有显著关联。结论:传统的自我报告和基于表现的活动能力测量与老年人清醒时的活动行为组成有关;然而,他们解释现实世界流动性的能力是有限的,并且在不同的测量中有所不同。考虑到老年人大部分时间都在这种活动强度上,任何测量与LIPA之间都缺乏联系是令人惊讶的。这些发现挑战了广泛使用传统的流动性措施来推断现实世界的流动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (IJBNPA) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. IJBNPA is devoted to furthering the understanding of the behavioral aspects of diet and physical activity and is unique in its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, including populations, groups and individuals and its inclusion of epidemiology, and behavioral, theoretical and measurement research areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书