[Artículo traducido] ¿Es suficiente un año de evolución tras la reparación del manguito rotador para ver los resultados funcionales?

Q3 Medicine
I. Pasqualini, N. Lucero Viviani, O. Turan, I. Domenech, E.T. Hurley, C. Larrague, I. Tanoira, M. Ranalletta, L. Rossi
{"title":"[Artículo traducido] ¿Es suficiente un año de evolución tras la reparación del manguito rotador para ver los resultados funcionales?","authors":"I. Pasqualini,&nbsp;N. Lucero Viviani,&nbsp;O. Turan,&nbsp;I. Domenech,&nbsp;E.T. Hurley,&nbsp;C. Larrague,&nbsp;I. Tanoira,&nbsp;M. Ranalletta,&nbsp;L. Rossi","doi":"10.1016/j.recot.2026.06.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair traditionally requires a 2-year follow-up to report results. However, most of the recovery occurs within the first year. The aim of this study was to determine if there are clinically significant changes in patient-reported outcome measures and clinically significant outcomes between the first and second postoperative years.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective analysis of 140 patients. Four scales (ASES, VAS, PSQI, and SANE) were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Clinical relevance was measured using the minimal clinically important difference. Linear regression was used to identify factors associated with changes in outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Improvements were observed in all scores; however, although statistically significant, these changes were minimal and lacked clinical relevance as they did not reach the minimal clinically important difference. Clinically significant outcome rates remained stable, except for the SANE score. Factors such as diabetes, subscapularis tears, and tear size were associated with score changes during the second year.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although there are slight statistical improvements in function, pain, and sleep quality between the first and second years, these are not clinically significant. A one-year follow-up is sufficient to evaluate functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the majority of patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39664,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","volume":"70 5","pages":"Pages T361-T365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888441526001268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair traditionally requires a 2-year follow-up to report results. However, most of the recovery occurs within the first year. The aim of this study was to determine if there are clinically significant changes in patient-reported outcome measures and clinically significant outcomes between the first and second postoperative years.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 140 patients. Four scales (ASES, VAS, PSQI, and SANE) were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Clinical relevance was measured using the minimal clinically important difference. Linear regression was used to identify factors associated with changes in outcomes.

Results

Improvements were observed in all scores; however, although statistically significant, these changes were minimal and lacked clinical relevance as they did not reach the minimal clinically important difference. Clinically significant outcome rates remained stable, except for the SANE score. Factors such as diabetes, subscapularis tears, and tear size were associated with score changes during the second year.

Conclusion

Although there are slight statistical improvements in function, pain, and sleep quality between the first and second years, these are not clinically significant. A one-year follow-up is sufficient to evaluate functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the majority of patients.
1年随访是否足以评估肩袖修复后的功能结局?
背景:关节镜下肩袖修复(ARCR)传统上需要2年的随访才能报告结果。然而,大部分的恢复发生在第一年。本研究的目的是确定患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)和临床显著结果(cso)在术后第一年和第二年之间是否有临床显著变化。方法:对140例患者进行回顾性分析。术前及术后1年和2年分别评估4种量表(as、VAS、PSQI和SANE)。临床相关性采用最小临床重要差异(MCID)来衡量。线性回归用于确定与结果变化相关的因素。结果:各评分均有改善;然而,尽管具有统计学意义,但这些变化很小,缺乏临床相关性,因为它们没有达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)。除SANE评分外,临床显著结局(CSO)率保持稳定。糖尿病、肩胛下肌撕裂和撕裂大小等因素与第二年的评分变化有关。结论:虽然第一年和第二年在功能、疼痛和睡眠质量方面有轻微的统计学改善,但这些在临床上并不显著。一年的随访足以评估大多数患者在ARCR后的功能结局。证据等级iv:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
51 weeks
期刊介绍: Es una magnífica revista para acceder a los mejores artículos de investigación en la especialidad y los casos clínicos de mayor interés. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad, y está incluida en prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书