Importance of Comprehensive Tinnitus Assessment: A Conceptual Analysis of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-Linked Questionnaires.

IF 1.8 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Journal of Audiology and Otology Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-25 DOI:10.7874/jao.2025.00346
Alida Naudé, Amisha Kanji
{"title":"Importance of Comprehensive Tinnitus Assessment: A Conceptual Analysis of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-Linked Questionnaires.","authors":"Alida Naudé, Amisha Kanji","doi":"10.7874/jao.2025.00346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the extent to which commonly used tinnitus questionnaires align with relevant International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domains. The aim is not to establish the superiority of any tool, but rather to identify potential gaps in domain coverage and to support more intentional questionnaire selection. A rapid review was conducted to identify validated tinnitus questionnaires used in clinical practice. Each questionnaire was systematically linked to ICF categories employing established frameworks. The study compared the domain coverage of the ICF-based international inventory for tinnitus (ICF-TINI) with that of other commonly used questionnaires and mapped overlapping and unique ICF codes to determine the breadth of coverage. While ICF-TINI addressed a wide range of ICF domains, no single questionnaire provided complete coverage, particularly for the domains of environmental factors and participation. Other tools such as the Tinnitus Functional Index and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory also demonstrated broad but incomplete domain representation. The findings underscore the importance of strategically combining tinnitus questionnaires based on ICF domain mapping, rather than relying solely on familiarity or tradition. The study proposes an evidence-informed approach to tool selection that may enhance person-centered tinnitus assessment. Further research is required to determine whether broader ICF coverage leads to improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","volume":" ","pages":"141-151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13425014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2025.00346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the extent to which commonly used tinnitus questionnaires align with relevant International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domains. The aim is not to establish the superiority of any tool, but rather to identify potential gaps in domain coverage and to support more intentional questionnaire selection. A rapid review was conducted to identify validated tinnitus questionnaires used in clinical practice. Each questionnaire was systematically linked to ICF categories employing established frameworks. The study compared the domain coverage of the ICF-based international inventory for tinnitus (ICF-TINI) with that of other commonly used questionnaires and mapped overlapping and unique ICF codes to determine the breadth of coverage. While ICF-TINI addressed a wide range of ICF domains, no single questionnaire provided complete coverage, particularly for the domains of environmental factors and participation. Other tools such as the Tinnitus Functional Index and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory also demonstrated broad but incomplete domain representation. The findings underscore the importance of strategically combining tinnitus questionnaires based on ICF domain mapping, rather than relying solely on familiarity or tradition. The study proposes an evidence-informed approach to tool selection that may enhance person-centered tinnitus assessment. Further research is required to determine whether broader ICF coverage leads to improved outcomes.

综合耳鸣评估的重要性:国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)相关问卷的概念分析。
本研究探讨了常用耳鸣问卷与相关国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)领域的一致程度。目的不是建立任何工具的优越性,而是确定领域覆盖的潜在差距,并支持更有意的问卷选择。快速审查进行了确定有效的耳鸣问卷用于临床实践。每一份调查表都系统地与采用既定框架的ICF类别联系起来。该研究比较了基于ICF的国际耳鸣清单(ICF- tini)与其他常用问卷的领域覆盖范围,并绘制了重叠和独特的ICF代码以确定覆盖范围。虽然ICF- tini涉及广泛的ICF领域,但没有一份调查表能够完全覆盖,特别是环境因素和参与领域。其他工具如耳鸣功能指数和耳鸣障碍清单也表现出广泛但不完整的领域代表性。研究结果强调了基于ICF域映射的耳鸣问卷的战略性结合的重要性,而不是仅仅依赖于熟悉或传统。该研究提出了一种循证的工具选择方法,可以增强以人为中心的耳鸣评估。需要进一步的研究来确定更广泛的ICF覆盖是否会改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Audiology and Otology
Journal of Audiology and Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Audiology and Otology (JAO) (formerly known as Korean Journal of Audiology) aims to publish the most advanced findings for all aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear using state-of-the-art techniques and analyses. The journal covers recent trends related to the topics of audiology, otology, and neurotology conducted by professionals, with the goal of providing better possible treatment to people of all ages, from infants to the elderly, who suffer from auditory and/or vestibular disorders and thus, improving their quality of life. This journal encourages the submission of review papers about current professional issues, research papers presenting a scientific base and clinical application, and case papers with unique reports or clinical trials. We also invite letters to the editor and papers related to the manufacture and distribution of medical devices. This journal provides integrated views from otologists, audiologists, and other healthcare practitioners, offering readers high quality scientific and clinical information. This peer-reviewed and open access journal has been the official journal of the Korean Audiological Society since 1997 and of both the Korean Audiological Society and the Korean Otological Society since 2017. It is published in English four times a year in January, April, July, and October.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书