Importance of Comprehensive Tinnitus Assessment: A Conceptual Analysis of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-Linked Questionnaires.
{"title":"Importance of Comprehensive Tinnitus Assessment: A Conceptual Analysis of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-Linked Questionnaires.","authors":"Alida Naudé, Amisha Kanji","doi":"10.7874/jao.2025.00346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the extent to which commonly used tinnitus questionnaires align with relevant International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domains. The aim is not to establish the superiority of any tool, but rather to identify potential gaps in domain coverage and to support more intentional questionnaire selection. A rapid review was conducted to identify validated tinnitus questionnaires used in clinical practice. Each questionnaire was systematically linked to ICF categories employing established frameworks. The study compared the domain coverage of the ICF-based international inventory for tinnitus (ICF-TINI) with that of other commonly used questionnaires and mapped overlapping and unique ICF codes to determine the breadth of coverage. While ICF-TINI addressed a wide range of ICF domains, no single questionnaire provided complete coverage, particularly for the domains of environmental factors and participation. Other tools such as the Tinnitus Functional Index and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory also demonstrated broad but incomplete domain representation. The findings underscore the importance of strategically combining tinnitus questionnaires based on ICF domain mapping, rather than relying solely on familiarity or tradition. The study proposes an evidence-informed approach to tool selection that may enhance person-centered tinnitus assessment. Further research is required to determine whether broader ICF coverage leads to improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","volume":" ","pages":"141-151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13425014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7874/jao.2025.00346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores the extent to which commonly used tinnitus questionnaires align with relevant International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domains. The aim is not to establish the superiority of any tool, but rather to identify potential gaps in domain coverage and to support more intentional questionnaire selection. A rapid review was conducted to identify validated tinnitus questionnaires used in clinical practice. Each questionnaire was systematically linked to ICF categories employing established frameworks. The study compared the domain coverage of the ICF-based international inventory for tinnitus (ICF-TINI) with that of other commonly used questionnaires and mapped overlapping and unique ICF codes to determine the breadth of coverage. While ICF-TINI addressed a wide range of ICF domains, no single questionnaire provided complete coverage, particularly for the domains of environmental factors and participation. Other tools such as the Tinnitus Functional Index and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory also demonstrated broad but incomplete domain representation. The findings underscore the importance of strategically combining tinnitus questionnaires based on ICF domain mapping, rather than relying solely on familiarity or tradition. The study proposes an evidence-informed approach to tool selection that may enhance person-centered tinnitus assessment. Further research is required to determine whether broader ICF coverage leads to improved outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Audiology and Otology (JAO) (formerly known as Korean Journal of Audiology) aims to publish the most advanced findings for all aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear using state-of-the-art techniques and analyses. The journal covers recent trends related to the topics of audiology, otology, and neurotology conducted by professionals, with the goal of providing better possible treatment to people of all ages, from infants to the elderly, who suffer from auditory and/or vestibular disorders and thus, improving their quality of life. This journal encourages the submission of review papers about current professional issues, research papers presenting a scientific base and clinical application, and case papers with unique reports or clinical trials. We also invite letters to the editor and papers related to the manufacture and distribution of medical devices. This journal provides integrated views from otologists, audiologists, and other healthcare practitioners, offering readers high quality scientific and clinical information. This peer-reviewed and open access journal has been the official journal of the Korean Audiological Society since 1997 and of both the Korean Audiological Society and the Korean Otological Society since 2017. It is published in English four times a year in January, April, July, and October.