Validation and standardization of the Scale of Self-Perception of Central Auditory Processing Skills (EAPAC) - expanded.

IF 0.9 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
CoDAS Pub Date : 2026-06-19 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/e20250215pt
Luciana Cássia de Jesus, Luciana Mendonça Alves, Luciana Macedo de Resende
{"title":"Validation and standardization of the Scale of Self-Perception of Central Auditory Processing Skills (EAPAC) - expanded.","authors":"Luciana Cássia de Jesus, Luciana Mendonça Alves, Luciana Macedo de Resende","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/e20250215pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To validate and standardize the online application of the Scale of Self-Perception of Central Auditory Processing Skills (EAPAC) - expanded for Brazilian adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The EAPAC was expanded and answered by 1,274 Brazilian individuals aged 18 to 59 years. Of these, 116 subjects underwent neuropsychological and auditory evaluation, and 63 were selected to answer the scale at a second time point. Those with any type and degree of hearing loss, history of speech-language-hearing therapy for central auditory processing disorder, and psychiatric and/or neurological alteration were excluded. Descriptive analysis of the variables, exploratory factor analysis, and ROC curve were performed for validation and standardization. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the responses of the subjects who answered the scale at two time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After exploratory factor analysis, five questions were excluded, as they did not correlate with the scale domains. The ROC curves, constructed considering the presence of auditory processing disorder and the result by auditory processes, did not indicate significant values. Thus, the scale presented fragile sensitivity and specificity values. There was no significant difference in the subjects' responses to the scale between the two time points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The expanded scale did not present adequate psychometric standards for identifying the risk for central auditory processing disorder, but it proved useful for investigating auditory complaints in everyday tasks, thus helping to select strategies to minimize the negative impact of the difficulties mentioned.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":"38 4","pages":"e20250215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13322490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20250215pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To validate and standardize the online application of the Scale of Self-Perception of Central Auditory Processing Skills (EAPAC) - expanded for Brazilian adults.

Methods: The EAPAC was expanded and answered by 1,274 Brazilian individuals aged 18 to 59 years. Of these, 116 subjects underwent neuropsychological and auditory evaluation, and 63 were selected to answer the scale at a second time point. Those with any type and degree of hearing loss, history of speech-language-hearing therapy for central auditory processing disorder, and psychiatric and/or neurological alteration were excluded. Descriptive analysis of the variables, exploratory factor analysis, and ROC curve were performed for validation and standardization. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the responses of the subjects who answered the scale at two time points.

Results: After exploratory factor analysis, five questions were excluded, as they did not correlate with the scale domains. The ROC curves, constructed considering the presence of auditory processing disorder and the result by auditory processes, did not indicate significant values. Thus, the scale presented fragile sensitivity and specificity values. There was no significant difference in the subjects' responses to the scale between the two time points.

Conclusion: The expanded scale did not present adequate psychometric standards for identifying the risk for central auditory processing disorder, but it proved useful for investigating auditory complaints in everyday tasks, thus helping to select strategies to minimize the negative impact of the difficulties mentioned.

中央听觉加工技能自我知觉量表的验证与标准化——扩展。
目的:验证和规范巴西成人中央听觉加工技能自我知觉量表(EAPAC)的在线应用。方法:扩大EAPAC并对1,274名年龄在18至59岁之间的巴西人进行回答。其中,116名受试者接受了神经心理学和听觉评估,63名受试者被选中在第二个时间点回答量表。排除了任何类型和程度的听力损失,中枢听觉处理障碍的言语-语言-听力治疗史以及精神和/或神经改变的患者。对变量进行描述性分析、探索性因子分析、ROC曲线进行验证和标准化。采用Wilcoxon检验比较在两个时间点回答量表的受试者的反应。结果:经探索性因子分析,排除了5个与量表域不相关的问题。考虑到听觉加工障碍的存在和听觉加工的结果,构建的ROC曲线没有显示显著值。因此,该量表具有脆弱的敏感性和特异性值。被试对量表的反应在两个时间点之间无显著差异。结论:扩大后的量表并不能提供足够的心理测量标准来识别中枢听觉加工障碍的风险,但它被证明对调查日常任务中的听觉抱怨是有用的,从而有助于选择策略来减少所提到的困难的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书