Andragogic Model Curriculum for One-Year ACGME-Accredited Fellowship Programs: Single-Center Educational Improvement Project.

IF 13.9 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Romy Yun, Allyson Farran, Echo Rowe, Dina Sheira, Christian Jackson, Thomas J Caruso
{"title":"Andragogic Model Curriculum for One-Year ACGME-Accredited Fellowship Programs: Single-Center Educational Improvement Project.","authors":"Romy Yun, Allyson Farran, Echo Rowe, Dina Sheira, Christian Jackson, Thomas J Caruso","doi":"10.2196/81570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of 1-year Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) fellowships continues to grow. The ACGME recommends a holistic curriculum with nonclinical areas, inclusive of educational sessions. Given the competing demands between clinical skill development, educational pursuits, and work-hour restrictions, we propose an andragogic curriculum using pediatric anesthesiology as the model fellowship.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective was to improve fellows' perceptions of their educational experience during their fellowship year after implementing an andragogic holistic curriculum. Secondary objectives assessed improvements in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training and resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center educational improvement project completed at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford. Data were collected between 2014 and 2024. The new curriculum was introduced in 2021-2022 and involved 12 different teaching modalities rooted in andragogic principles. A statistical process control p-chart was used to analyze the primary outcome based on the ACGME annual program evaluation. Outcomes were analyzed using censored regression modeling or a t test, depending on the presence of ceiling effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2014 to 2024, 58 of 60 pediatric anesthesiology fellows completed the ACGME survey. A break in the statistical process control p-chart for educational content scores occurred during 2021-2022, when the new curriculum was introduced. The mean difference was 0.89 (P<.001). Scores in DEI improved (mean difference 0.52; P=.03), and no difference was noted in resources (mean difference -0.13; P=.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Introduction of an andragogic curriculum into a pediatric anesthesiology fellowship program was associated with more favorable perceptions of educational content and DEI training.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"12 ","pages":"e81570"},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13290103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/81570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The number of 1-year Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) fellowships continues to grow. The ACGME recommends a holistic curriculum with nonclinical areas, inclusive of educational sessions. Given the competing demands between clinical skill development, educational pursuits, and work-hour restrictions, we propose an andragogic curriculum using pediatric anesthesiology as the model fellowship.

Objective: The primary objective was to improve fellows' perceptions of their educational experience during their fellowship year after implementing an andragogic holistic curriculum. Secondary objectives assessed improvements in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training and resources.

Methods: This was a single-center educational improvement project completed at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford. Data were collected between 2014 and 2024. The new curriculum was introduced in 2021-2022 and involved 12 different teaching modalities rooted in andragogic principles. A statistical process control p-chart was used to analyze the primary outcome based on the ACGME annual program evaluation. Outcomes were analyzed using censored regression modeling or a t test, depending on the presence of ceiling effects.

Results: From 2014 to 2024, 58 of 60 pediatric anesthesiology fellows completed the ACGME survey. A break in the statistical process control p-chart for educational content scores occurred during 2021-2022, when the new curriculum was introduced. The mean difference was 0.89 (P<.001). Scores in DEI improved (mean difference 0.52; P=.03), and no difference was noted in resources (mean difference -0.13; P=.98).

Conclusions: Introduction of an andragogic curriculum into a pediatric anesthesiology fellowship program was associated with more favorable perceptions of educational content and DEI training.

一年acgme认证的奖学金项目:单中心教育改进项目。
背景:一年的研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)奖学金的数量持续增长。ACGME推荐非临床领域的整体课程,包括教育课程。鉴于临床技能发展、教育追求和工作时间限制之间的竞争需求,我们建议以儿科麻醉学为模式的妇产科课程。目的:主要目的是提高研究员的看法,他们的教育经验,在他们的奖学金年实施了一个全面的课程。次要目标评估了多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)培训和资源的改善。方法:这是一项在斯坦福大学露西尔·帕卡德儿童医院完成的单中心教育改进项目。数据收集于2014年至2024年。新课程于2021-2022年推出,涉及12种基于哲学原则的不同教学模式。统计过程控制p图用于分析基于ACGME年度项目评估的主要结果。根据天花板效应的存在,使用删节回归模型或t检验对结果进行分析。结果:2014 - 2024年,60名儿科麻醉学研究员中有58名完成了ACGME调查。在引入新课程的2021-2022年期间,教育内容分数的统计过程控制p图出现了中断。平均差异为0.89 (p结论:在儿科麻醉学奖学金项目中引入性学课程与对教育内容和DEI培训的更有利的看法有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书