[Comparison of therapeutic effects of conventional puncture technique and target puncture technique in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in elderly by vertebroplasty].

Q4 Medicine
Zhongrui Liu, Dipeng Li, Guanrong Sun, Canfeng Chen, Li Li, Yongfeng Cui
{"title":"[Comparison of therapeutic effects of conventional puncture technique and target puncture technique in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in elderly by vertebroplasty].","authors":"Zhongrui Liu, Dipeng Li, Guanrong Sun, Canfeng Chen, Li Li, Yongfeng Cui","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore clinical efficacy of conventional puncture technique and precise target puncture technique in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) in elderly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2016 to December 2019, 64 elderly patients with OVCFs were treated by PVP technique. According to t different puncture methods, they were divided into conventional puncture technique group (conventional group) and precise target puncture technique group (target group). The conventional group consisted of 31 cases, included 4 males and 27 females, aged from 63 to 93 years old with an average of (75.58±7.98) years;15 patients with thoracic vertebrae and 23 patients with lumbar vertebrae. There were 33 patients in target group, included 4 males and 29 females;aged from 62 to 93 years old with an average of (74.61±8.17) years old;19 patients with thoracic vertebrae and 27 patients with lumbar vertebrae. Operation time, hospital stay, bone cement leakage, number of patients with bone cement leakage, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and the height of anterior vertebral margin between two groups were observed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both of two groups were followed up, and the follow-up period for conventional group ranged from 6 to 8 months with an average of (6.23±1.51) and for target group ranged from 6 to 10 months with an average of (6.76±1.11) months, there was no statistically significant difference in follow-up period between two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in operation time, hospital stay, bone cement leakage, bone cement injection volume, and VAS before operation and 6 months after operation between two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). VAS of target group decreased from (7.36±0.49) points before operation to (1.64±0.49), (1.30±0.47), and (0.82±0.39) points respectively at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after operation;VAS of control group decreased from (7.42±0.50) before operation to (1.97±0.18), (1.64±0.49), and (0.94±0.44) respectively at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after operation;the differences were all statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05);VAS of target group was lower than that of conventional group at 1 day and 1 month after operation (<i>P</i><0.05). Postoperative anterior vertebral height at 3 days and 6 months in target group were (24.04±5.40) mm and (23.71±2.65) mm respectively, while in conventional group were (23.89±4.00) mm and (22.21±3.63) mm respectively;and there were no statistically significant difference in anterior vertebral height between two groups at 3 days after operation (<i>P</i>>0.05);postoperative anterior vertebral height of target group was higher than that of conventional group at 6 months, and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i>< 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PVP puncture technique not only retains advantages of traditional PVP, such as short operation time, short hospital stay, and immediate pain relief, but also has better efficacy in reducing pain intensity and preventing short-term loss of vertebral height. It is a preferable treatment option for elderly patients with OVCFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"39 6","pages":"591-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore clinical efficacy of conventional puncture technique and precise target puncture technique in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) in elderly.

Methods: From January 2016 to December 2019, 64 elderly patients with OVCFs were treated by PVP technique. According to t different puncture methods, they were divided into conventional puncture technique group (conventional group) and precise target puncture technique group (target group). The conventional group consisted of 31 cases, included 4 males and 27 females, aged from 63 to 93 years old with an average of (75.58±7.98) years;15 patients with thoracic vertebrae and 23 patients with lumbar vertebrae. There were 33 patients in target group, included 4 males and 29 females;aged from 62 to 93 years old with an average of (74.61±8.17) years old;19 patients with thoracic vertebrae and 27 patients with lumbar vertebrae. Operation time, hospital stay, bone cement leakage, number of patients with bone cement leakage, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and the height of anterior vertebral margin between two groups were observed and compared.

Results: Both of two groups were followed up, and the follow-up period for conventional group ranged from 6 to 8 months with an average of (6.23±1.51) and for target group ranged from 6 to 10 months with an average of (6.76±1.11) months, there was no statistically significant difference in follow-up period between two groups (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in operation time, hospital stay, bone cement leakage, bone cement injection volume, and VAS before operation and 6 months after operation between two groups (P>0.05). VAS of target group decreased from (7.36±0.49) points before operation to (1.64±0.49), (1.30±0.47), and (0.82±0.39) points respectively at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after operation;VAS of control group decreased from (7.42±0.50) before operation to (1.97±0.18), (1.64±0.49), and (0.94±0.44) respectively at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after operation;the differences were all statistically significant (P<0.05);VAS of target group was lower than that of conventional group at 1 day and 1 month after operation (P<0.05). Postoperative anterior vertebral height at 3 days and 6 months in target group were (24.04±5.40) mm and (23.71±2.65) mm respectively, while in conventional group were (23.89±4.00) mm and (22.21±3.63) mm respectively;and there were no statistically significant difference in anterior vertebral height between two groups at 3 days after operation (P>0.05);postoperative anterior vertebral height of target group was higher than that of conventional group at 6 months, and the difference was statistically significant (P< 0.05).

Conclusion: PVP puncture technique not only retains advantages of traditional PVP, such as short operation time, short hospital stay, and immediate pain relief, but also has better efficacy in reducing pain intensity and preventing short-term loss of vertebral height. It is a preferable treatment option for elderly patients with OVCFs.

[常规穿刺技术与靶穿刺技术在椎体成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折中的疗效比较]。
目的:探讨常规穿刺技术与精确靶穿刺技术在经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)中的临床疗效。方法:2016年1月至2019年12月,对64例老年OVCFs患者进行PVP治疗。根据穿刺方式的不同分为常规穿刺技术组(常规组)和精确靶穿刺技术组(靶组)。常规组31例,男4例,女27例,年龄63 ~ 93岁,平均(75.58±7.98)岁;15例胸椎,23例腰椎。目标组33例,其中男性4例,女性29例;年龄62 ~ 93岁,平均(74.61±8.17)岁;19例胸椎27例腰椎。观察比较两组手术时间、住院时间、骨水泥渗漏、骨水泥渗漏患者数、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、椎前缘高度。结果:两组均进行了随访,常规组随访时间为6 ~ 8个月,平均为(6.23±1.51)个月;靶组随访时间为6 ~ 10个月,平均为(6.76±1.11)个月,两组随访时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者术前、术后6个月手术时间、住院时间、骨水泥漏量、骨水泥注射量、VAS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。目标组VAS由术前(7.36±0.49)分下降至术后1天、1个月、6个月VAS分别为(1.64±0.49)分、(1.30±0.47)分、(0.82±0.39)分;对照组VAS由术前的(7.42±0.50)降至术后1天、1个月、6个月的(1.97±0.18)、(1.64±0.49)、(0.94±0.44);差异均有统计学意义(PPP 0.05);术后6个月目标组椎体前高度高于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P< 0.05)。结论:PVP穿刺技术不仅保留了传统PVP手术时间短、住院时间短、疼痛立即缓解等优点,而且在减轻疼痛强度、防止椎体高度短期丢失方面具有更好的疗效。它是老年OVCFs患者较好的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书