[Application of vacuum sealing drainage combined with antibiotic bone cement in Gustilo type Ⅲ open ankle fractures].

Q4 Medicine
Chunming Hu, Xiaofeng Xue, Baoping Liang, Jianjun Niu
{"title":"[Application of vacuum sealing drainage combined with antibiotic bone cement in Gustilo type Ⅲ open ankle fractures].","authors":"Chunming Hu, Xiaofeng Xue, Baoping Liang, Jianjun Niu","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate clinical efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) combined with antibiotic bone cement in treating Gustilo type Ⅲ open ankle fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2022 to December 2024, 120 patients with Gustilo type Ⅲ open fractures of ankle were treated, and were divided into control group and VSD group according to treatment methods. In control group, there were 58 patients, including 35 males and 23 females;aged from 25 to 58 years old with an average of (45.93±12.82) years old;14 patients with type Ⅲ A, 27 patients with type Ⅲ B, and 17 patients with type Ⅲ C according to Gustilo classification;treated with VSD. In VSD group, there were 62 patients, including 41 males and 21 females;aged from 23 to 58 years old with an average of (45.24±13.05) years old;16 patients with type Ⅲ A, 31 patients with type Ⅲ B, and 15 patients with type Ⅲ C according to Gustilo classification;treated with VSD combined with antibiotic bone cement. The wound healing time, fracture healing time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications between two groups were recorded and compared. The changes in white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil percentage (NEU), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were compared between two groups before operation and 1 month after operation. The secretions from patients' wounds were collected for isolation, culture and identification of pathogenic bacteria before operation, 7 and 14 days after operation. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by using American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle function score to assess recovery of ankle joint function at 6 months after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were followed up for 8 to 12 months with average of (9.3±2.6) months. The wound healing time, fracture healing time and hospital stay in VSD group were (26.7±4.2) days, (6.9±1.3) months and (30.8±4.7) days respectively, which were better than those in control group (32.3±5.6) days, (8.7±1.8) months, (35.6±5.1) days, and the differences were statistically significant(<i>P</i><0.05). At 1 month after operation, the levels of WBC, NEU, ESR and CRP in VSD group were(7.3±1.2) × 10<sup>9</sup>·L<sup>-1</sup>, (60.6±5.7)%, (17.9±4.8) mm·h<sup>-1</sup> and (7.1±1.8) mg·L<sup>-1</sup> respectively, which were better than those in control group (9.6±1.5)×10<sup>9</sup>·L<sup>-1</sup>, (67.8±6.3)%, (26.8±5.3) mm·h<sup>-1</sup>, (10.6±3.2) mg·L<sup>-1</sup>, and the differences were statistically significant between two groups(<i>P</i><0.05). Among 97 patients with preoperative wound infections, a total of 132 pathogenic bacteria were isolated. The main species were escherichia coli (37, 28.0%), staphylococcus aureus (24, 18.2%), and pseudomonas aeruginosa (19, 14.4%). The pathogen clearance rate at 14 days after operation in VSD group (100%, 50/50) was higher than that in control group (63.8%, 30/47), and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05). At 6 months after operation, AOFAS score of VSD group was (83.5±4.2) points, which was higher than that of control group (72.1±5.3) points, and the difference was statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications between two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of VSD and antibiotic bone cement could effectively accelerate wound and fracture healing, shorten hospital stay, better control infection and inhibit inflammatory response, promote ankle joint function recovery, and does not increase the risk of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"39 6","pages":"560-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20250614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate clinical efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) combined with antibiotic bone cement in treating Gustilo type Ⅲ open ankle fractures.

Methods: From December 2022 to December 2024, 120 patients with Gustilo type Ⅲ open fractures of ankle were treated, and were divided into control group and VSD group according to treatment methods. In control group, there were 58 patients, including 35 males and 23 females;aged from 25 to 58 years old with an average of (45.93±12.82) years old;14 patients with type Ⅲ A, 27 patients with type Ⅲ B, and 17 patients with type Ⅲ C according to Gustilo classification;treated with VSD. In VSD group, there were 62 patients, including 41 males and 21 females;aged from 23 to 58 years old with an average of (45.24±13.05) years old;16 patients with type Ⅲ A, 31 patients with type Ⅲ B, and 15 patients with type Ⅲ C according to Gustilo classification;treated with VSD combined with antibiotic bone cement. The wound healing time, fracture healing time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications between two groups were recorded and compared. The changes in white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil percentage (NEU), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were compared between two groups before operation and 1 month after operation. The secretions from patients' wounds were collected for isolation, culture and identification of pathogenic bacteria before operation, 7 and 14 days after operation. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by using American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle function score to assess recovery of ankle joint function at 6 months after operation.

Results: All patients were followed up for 8 to 12 months with average of (9.3±2.6) months. The wound healing time, fracture healing time and hospital stay in VSD group were (26.7±4.2) days, (6.9±1.3) months and (30.8±4.7) days respectively, which were better than those in control group (32.3±5.6) days, (8.7±1.8) months, (35.6±5.1) days, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). At 1 month after operation, the levels of WBC, NEU, ESR and CRP in VSD group were(7.3±1.2) × 109·L-1, (60.6±5.7)%, (17.9±4.8) mm·h-1 and (7.1±1.8) mg·L-1 respectively, which were better than those in control group (9.6±1.5)×109·L-1, (67.8±6.3)%, (26.8±5.3) mm·h-1, (10.6±3.2) mg·L-1, and the differences were statistically significant between two groups(P<0.05). Among 97 patients with preoperative wound infections, a total of 132 pathogenic bacteria were isolated. The main species were escherichia coli (37, 28.0%), staphylococcus aureus (24, 18.2%), and pseudomonas aeruginosa (19, 14.4%). The pathogen clearance rate at 14 days after operation in VSD group (100%, 50/50) was higher than that in control group (63.8%, 30/47), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). At 6 months after operation, AOFAS score of VSD group was (83.5±4.2) points, which was higher than that of control group (72.1±5.3) points, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications between two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion: The combination of VSD and antibiotic bone cement could effectively accelerate wound and fracture healing, shorten hospital stay, better control infection and inhibit inflammatory response, promote ankle joint function recovery, and does not increase the risk of complications.

[真空密封引流联合抗生素骨水泥在Gustilo型Ⅲ开放性踝关节骨折中的应用]。
目的:探讨真空密封引流联合抗生素骨水泥治疗Gustilo型Ⅲ开放性踝关节骨折的临床疗效。方法:选取2022年12月~ 2024年12月收治的120例古斯蒂洛型Ⅲ踝关节开放性骨折患者,根据治疗方法分为对照组和VSD组。对照组58例,其中男性35例,女性23例;年龄25 ~ 58岁,平均(45.93±12.82)岁;Gustilo分型ⅢA型14例,ⅢB型27例,ⅢC型17例;经VSD治疗。VSD组62例,其中男41例,女21例;年龄23 ~ 58岁,平均(45.24±13.05)岁;Gustilo分型ⅢA型16例,ⅢB型31例,ⅢC型15例;VSD联合抗生素骨水泥治疗。记录两组伤口愈合时间、骨折愈合时间、住院时间及术后并发症。比较两组患者术前及术后1个月白细胞计数(WBC)、中性粒细胞百分比(NEU)、c反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)的变化。术前、术后7、14 d采集患者伤口分泌物进行病原菌分离培养和鉴定。临床疗效采用美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)踝关节功能评分评估术后6个月踝关节功能恢复情况。结果:所有患者随访8 ~ 12个月,平均(9.3±2.6)个月。VSD组创面愈合时间、骨折愈合时间、住院时间分别为(26.7±4.2)天、(6.9±1.3)个月、(30.8±4.7)天,均优于对照组(32.3±5.6)天、(8.7±1.8)个月、(35.6±5.1)天,差异均有统计学意义(P9·L-1、(60.6±5.7)%、(17.9±4.8)mm·h-1、(7.1±1.8)mg·L-1,均优于对照组(9.6±1.5)×109·L-1、(67.8±6.3)%、(26.8±5.3)mm·h-1、(10.6±3.2)mg·L-1、两组间差异均有统计学意义(PPPP 0.05)。结论:VSD联合抗生素骨水泥可有效加速创面和骨折愈合,缩短住院时间,更好地控制感染和抑制炎症反应,促进踝关节功能恢复,且不增加并发症发生风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书