Improved Radiofrequency Safety Modelling in MRI Using In Vivo Measurements of Brain Conductivity.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Guillaume Paillart, Zhongzheng He, Grecia Romero, Pauline Ferry, Khalid Ambarki, Paul Soullié, Jacques Felblinger, Freddy Odille
{"title":"Improved Radiofrequency Safety Modelling in MRI Using In Vivo Measurements of Brain Conductivity.","authors":"Guillaume Paillart, Zhongzheng He, Grecia Romero, Pauline Ferry, Khalid Ambarki, Paul Soullié, Jacques Felblinger, Freddy Odille","doi":"10.1002/nbm.70335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tissue electrical properties are required by electromagnetic simulation software to conduct radiofrequency (RF) safety studies. Values are commonly taken from existing databases of tissue properties, where brain conductivity was measured ex vivo. We hypothesize that using in vivo brain conductivity values, as reported in the recent literature on in vivo MRI measurements, can improve the accuracy of such simulations. Sixteen subjects were scanned at 3T to obtain experimental maps of the transmit RF field, <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {B}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , of the head. Electromagnetic simulations were performed using biomodels with varying morphologies, using both a conventional ( <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>σ</mi> <mrow><mi>ex</mi> <mspace></mspace> <mtext>vivo</mtext></mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.46</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mi>S</mi> <mo>/</mo> <mi>m</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\sigma}_{\\mathrm{ex}\\ \\mathrm{vivo}}=0.46\\ \\mathrm{S}/\\mathrm{m} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) and a modified brain conductivity ( <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>σ</mi> <mtext>in vivo</mtext></msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.70</mn> <mspace></mspace> <mi>S</mi> <mo>/</mo> <mi>m</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\sigma}_{\\mathrm{in}\\ \\mathrm{vivo}}=0.70\\ \\mathrm{S}/\\mathrm{m} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ). A framework was developed to process the simulated <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {B}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> fields, including a systematic method to combine the two excitation ports of the transmit coil model (accounting for different load impedances between simulation and experiment), geometric alignment, and scaling of the simulated fields, allowing a quantitative comparison of complex <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {B}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> maps of the brain with experimental maps. Specific absorption rate (SAR) maps were also estimated by different methods, including a novel <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {B}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> -derived formula. Normalized root-mean-squared errors between simulation and experiment, in the brain, were approximately 6% for <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {B}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> magnitude. While head geometry mainly impacted the accuracy of <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {B}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> magnitude, with errors up to 11% (p = 0.007) between the best fitting human model and the worst one, brain electrical conductivity mainly impacted <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>B</mi> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {B}_1^{+} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> phase, with errors reduced by 48% when using <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>σ</mi> <mtext>in vivo</mtext></msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\sigma}_{\\mathrm{in}\\ \\mathrm{vivo}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> instead of <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>σ</mi> <mrow><mi>ex</mi> <mspace></mspace> <mtext>vivo</mtext></mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\sigma}_{\\mathrm{ex}\\ \\mathrm{vivo}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> (p = 0.0004). The agreement in average brain SAR, between simulation and experiment, was also improved, with differences reduced from 62% ( <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>σ</mi> <mrow><mi>ex</mi> <mspace></mspace> <mtext>vivo</mtext></mrow> </msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\sigma}_{\\mathrm{ex}\\ \\mathrm{vivo}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) to 22% ( <math> <semantics> <mrow><msub><mi>σ</mi> <mtext>in vivo</mtext></msub> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {\\sigma}_{\\mathrm{in}\\ \\mathrm{vivo}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> ). Using brain conductivity values from recent in vivo studies improves the accuracy of RF safety modelling. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04645628.</p>","PeriodicalId":19309,"journal":{"name":"NMR in Biomedicine","volume":"39 8","pages":"e70335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13291641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NMR in Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tissue electrical properties are required by electromagnetic simulation software to conduct radiofrequency (RF) safety studies. Values are commonly taken from existing databases of tissue properties, where brain conductivity was measured ex vivo. We hypothesize that using in vivo brain conductivity values, as reported in the recent literature on in vivo MRI measurements, can improve the accuracy of such simulations. Sixteen subjects were scanned at 3T to obtain experimental maps of the transmit RF field, B 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ , of the head. Electromagnetic simulations were performed using biomodels with varying morphologies, using both a conventional ( σ ex vivo = 0.46 S / m $$ {\sigma}_{\mathrm{ex}\ \mathrm{vivo}}=0.46\ \mathrm{S}/\mathrm{m} $$ ) and a modified brain conductivity ( σ in vivo = 0.70 S / m $$ {\sigma}_{\mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{vivo}}=0.70\ \mathrm{S}/\mathrm{m} $$ ). A framework was developed to process the simulated B 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ fields, including a systematic method to combine the two excitation ports of the transmit coil model (accounting for different load impedances between simulation and experiment), geometric alignment, and scaling of the simulated fields, allowing a quantitative comparison of complex B 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ maps of the brain with experimental maps. Specific absorption rate (SAR) maps were also estimated by different methods, including a novel B 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ -derived formula. Normalized root-mean-squared errors between simulation and experiment, in the brain, were approximately 6% for B 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ magnitude. While head geometry mainly impacted the accuracy of B 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ magnitude, with errors up to 11% (p = 0.007) between the best fitting human model and the worst one, brain electrical conductivity mainly impacted B 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ phase, with errors reduced by 48% when using σ in vivo $$ {\sigma}_{\mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{vivo}} $$ instead of σ ex vivo $$ {\sigma}_{\mathrm{ex}\ \mathrm{vivo}} $$ (p = 0.0004). The agreement in average brain SAR, between simulation and experiment, was also improved, with differences reduced from 62% ( σ ex vivo $$ {\sigma}_{\mathrm{ex}\ \mathrm{vivo}} $$ ) to 22% ( σ in vivo $$ {\sigma}_{\mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{vivo}} $$ ). Using brain conductivity values from recent in vivo studies improves the accuracy of RF safety modelling. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04645628.

利用活体脑电导率测量改进MRI射频安全建模。
电磁模拟软件需要组织电学特性来进行射频(RF)安全性研究。数值通常取自现有的组织特性数据库,其中脑电导率是在体外测量的。我们假设使用体内脑电导率值,正如最近关于体内MRI测量的文献所报道的那样,可以提高这种模拟的准确性。对16名受试者进行3T扫描,获得头部发射射频场b1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$的实验图。采用不同形态的生物模型进行电磁模拟,采用传统的(σ离体= 0.46 S / m $$ {\sigma}_{\mathrm{ex}\ \mathrm{vivo}}=0.46\ \mathrm{S}/\mathrm{m} $$)和改良的脑电导率(σ在体= 0.70 S / m $$ {\sigma}_{\mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{vivo}}=0.70\ \mathrm{S}/\mathrm{m} $$)。开发了一个框架来处理模拟b1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$场,包括系统地结合发射线圈模型的两个激励端口(考虑模拟和实验之间不同的负载阻抗)、几何对齐和模拟场的缩放方法,从而可以将复杂的b1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$脑图与实验图进行定量比较。比吸收率(SAR)图也通过不同的方法估计,包括一个新的b1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$衍生公式。在大脑中,模拟和实验之间的标准化均方根误差约为6% for B 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ magnitude. While head geometry mainly impacted the accuracy of B 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ magnitude, with errors up to 11% (p = 0.007) between the best fitting human model and the worst one, brain electrical conductivity mainly impacted B 1 + $$ {B}_1^{+} $$ phase, with errors reduced by 48% when using σ in vivo $$ {\sigma}_{\mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{vivo}} $$ instead of σ ex vivo $$ {\sigma}_{\mathrm{ex}\ \mathrm{vivo}} $$ (p = 0.0004). The agreement in average brain SAR, between simulation and experiment, was also improved, with differences reduced from 62% ( σ ex vivo $$ {\sigma}_{\mathrm{ex}\ \mathrm{vivo}} $$ ) to 22% ( σ in vivo $$ {\sigma}_{\mathrm{in}\ \mathrm{vivo}} $$ ). Using brain conductivity values from recent in vivo studies improves the accuracy of RF safety modelling. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04645628.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NMR in Biomedicine
NMR in Biomedicine 医学-光谱学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.30%
发文量
209
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: NMR in Biomedicine is a journal devoted to the publication of original full-length papers, rapid communications and review articles describing the development of magnetic resonance spectroscopy or imaging methods or their use to investigate physiological, biochemical, biophysical or medical problems. Topics for submitted papers should be in one of the following general categories: (a) development of methods and instrumentation for MR of biological systems; (b) studies of normal or diseased organs, tissues or cells; (c) diagnosis or treatment of disease. Reports may cover work on patients or healthy human subjects, in vivo animal experiments, studies of isolated organs or cultured cells, analysis of tissue extracts, NMR theory, experimental techniques, or instrumentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书