Ethnic differences in specialty destinations in UK medicine: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of secondary data.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-24 DOI:10.1177/01410768261455488
Celia Brown, Nariell Morrison, Karen Aus, Anna Coulson, Amir H Sam
{"title":"Ethnic differences in specialty destinations in UK medicine: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of secondary data.","authors":"Celia Brown, Nariell Morrison, Karen Aus, Anna Coulson, Amir H Sam","doi":"10.1177/01410768261455488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine time-trends in ethnic differences in UK medical specialty destinations at two key career points: entry into specialty training (CT/ST1) and awarding Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Repeated cross-sectional analysis using General Medical Council (GMC) secondary data; CT/ST1: 12 specialties, 2012-2022; CCT: 11 specialties, 2007-2021.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Postgraduate specialty training groups within the UK National Health Service.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Doctors with a UK Primary Medical Qualification (CT/ST1: 64,995; CCT: 62,380), categorised as White, Asian and other ethnic groups using GMC data.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The ethnic distribution across specialties was examined using chi-squared tests. The temporal trend was evaluated with ordinary least squares regression of the effect size. Trends in over- and under-representation of ethnic groups within specialties were identified using Kendall's tau-b correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>White doctors comprised the majority proportion (67.1% CT/ST1; 70.3% CCT), followed by Asian (23.4% CT/ST1; 22.6% CCT) and other ethnicities (9.5% CT/ST1; 7.1% CCT). Ethnic differences were statistically significant for all years except CCT in 2007, with larger effect sizes at CT/ST1. Effect sizes increased over time at both levels (CT/ST1 <i>p</i> = 0.041; CCT <i>p</i> = 0.024). Asian doctors were over-represented in Ophthalmology at both levels and Radiology at CT/ST1, and White doctors over-represented in Acute Care at CT/ST1 and Emergency Medicine at CCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persistent ethnic differences exist in UK medical specialty destinations. Systemic factors may therefore influence specialty choice, selection processes and progression to CCT. Future research should explore the underlying causes of ethnic differences between specialties to assess if biases affect career progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":17271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"163-172"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13294109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01410768261455488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine time-trends in ethnic differences in UK medical specialty destinations at two key career points: entry into specialty training (CT/ST1) and awarding Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT).

Design: Repeated cross-sectional analysis using General Medical Council (GMC) secondary data; CT/ST1: 12 specialties, 2012-2022; CCT: 11 specialties, 2007-2021.

Setting: Postgraduate specialty training groups within the UK National Health Service.

Participants: Doctors with a UK Primary Medical Qualification (CT/ST1: 64,995; CCT: 62,380), categorised as White, Asian and other ethnic groups using GMC data.

Main outcome measures: The ethnic distribution across specialties was examined using chi-squared tests. The temporal trend was evaluated with ordinary least squares regression of the effect size. Trends in over- and under-representation of ethnic groups within specialties were identified using Kendall's tau-b correlations.

Results: White doctors comprised the majority proportion (67.1% CT/ST1; 70.3% CCT), followed by Asian (23.4% CT/ST1; 22.6% CCT) and other ethnicities (9.5% CT/ST1; 7.1% CCT). Ethnic differences were statistically significant for all years except CCT in 2007, with larger effect sizes at CT/ST1. Effect sizes increased over time at both levels (CT/ST1 p = 0.041; CCT p = 0.024). Asian doctors were over-represented in Ophthalmology at both levels and Radiology at CT/ST1, and White doctors over-represented in Acute Care at CT/ST1 and Emergency Medicine at CCT.

Conclusions: Persistent ethnic differences exist in UK medical specialty destinations. Systemic factors may therefore influence specialty choice, selection processes and progression to CCT. Future research should explore the underlying causes of ethnic differences between specialties to assess if biases affect career progression.

英国医学专业目的地的种族差异:二次数据的重复横断面分析。
目的:研究英国医学专业目的地在两个关键职业点上的种族差异的时间趋势:进入专业培训(CT/ST1)和颁发完成培训证书(CCT)。设计:使用通用医学委员会(GMC)的二手数据进行重复横断面分析;CT/ST1: 12个专业,2012-2022;CCT: 11个专业,2007-2021。环境:英国国家卫生服务机构内的研究生专业培训小组。参与者:具有英国初级医疗资格的医生(CT/ST1: 64,995; CCT: 62,380),使用GMC数据分类为白人,亚洲人和其他种族。主要结局指标:采用卡方检验检验各专科的种族分布。用效应量的普通最小二乘回归评价时间趋势。使用Kendall的tau-b相关性确定了专业中族裔群体代表性过高和不足的趋势。结果:白人医生占多数(67.1% CT/ST1; 70.3% CCT),其次为亚洲医生(23.4% CT/ST1; 22.6% CCT),其他族裔医生(9.5% CT/ST1; 7.1% CCT)。除2007年CCT外,所有年份的种族差异均具有统计学意义,CT/ST1的效应量更大。两种水平的效应值均随时间增加(CT/ST1 p = 0.041; CCT p = 0.024)。亚洲医生在各级眼科和CT/ST1放射科的比例都过高,而白人医生在CT/ST1急诊科和CCT急诊科的比例过高。结论:英国医学专业目的地存在持续的种族差异。因此,系统因素可能影响专业选择、选择过程和CCT的进展。未来的研究应该探索专业之间种族差异的潜在原因,以评估偏见是否影响职业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.50%
发文量
107
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since 1809, the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (JRSM) has been a trusted source of information in the medical field. Our publication covers a wide range of topics, including evidence-based reviews, original research papers, commentaries, and personal perspectives. As an independent scientific and educational journal, we strive to foster constructive discussions on vital clinical matters. While we are based in the UK, our articles address issues that are globally relevant and of interest to healthcare professionals worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书