Clinical and radiographic evaluation of soft and hard tissue changes following flap and flapless implant surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Q2 Dentistry
Vyshnavi Ravinuthala, K P Ashok, S S Manikanta Kumar, Anupama Masapu, Naga Sai Sowparnika Naidu, Sindhuri Yerra
{"title":"Clinical and radiographic evaluation of soft and hard tissue changes following flap and flapless implant surgery: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Vyshnavi Ravinuthala, K P Ashok, S S Manikanta Kumar, Anupama Masapu, Naga Sai Sowparnika Naidu, Sindhuri Yerra","doi":"10.4103/jisp.jisp_465_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent advancements in implant therapy have improved the management of edentulism by reducing surgical invasiveness and enhancing clinical outcomes. Conventional flap techniques, although providing adequate access, are associated with complications such as crestal bone loss and soft-tissue recession. Flapless surgery has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative that preserves periosteal integrity, reduces trauma, and promotes faster healing and patient comfort.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare soft- and hard-tissue changes following endosseous implant placement using flap and flapless technique.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized controlled single-blinded study included 30 participants, with 15 implants each allocated to flap (control) and flapless (test) groups. Patients with adequate ridge dimensions and good oral health were included. Clinical parameters, including keratinized mucosa width (KMW) and peri-implant probing depth, were recorded at baseline and at 4 months. Radiographic evaluation using intraoral periapical radiographs was performed to assess crestal bone levels immediately after implant placement and at 4 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed a significant reduction in KMW, with a greater reduction in the flapless group. Crestal bone levels were better preserved in the flapless group compared to the flap group at 4 months. No statistically significant difference in peri-implant probing depth was observed between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Flapless implant surgery may offer advantages in preserving peri-implant hard tissues and reducing postoperative complications. However, long-term studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","volume":"30 1","pages":"66-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13286533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_465_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent advancements in implant therapy have improved the management of edentulism by reducing surgical invasiveness and enhancing clinical outcomes. Conventional flap techniques, although providing adequate access, are associated with complications such as crestal bone loss and soft-tissue recession. Flapless surgery has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative that preserves periosteal integrity, reduces trauma, and promotes faster healing and patient comfort.

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare soft- and hard-tissue changes following endosseous implant placement using flap and flapless technique.

Materials and methods: This randomized controlled single-blinded study included 30 participants, with 15 implants each allocated to flap (control) and flapless (test) groups. Patients with adequate ridge dimensions and good oral health were included. Clinical parameters, including keratinized mucosa width (KMW) and peri-implant probing depth, were recorded at baseline and at 4 months. Radiographic evaluation using intraoral periapical radiographs was performed to assess crestal bone levels immediately after implant placement and at 4 months.

Results: Both groups showed a significant reduction in KMW, with a greater reduction in the flapless group. Crestal bone levels were better preserved in the flapless group compared to the flap group at 4 months. No statistically significant difference in peri-implant probing depth was observed between the groups.

Conclusion: Flapless implant surgery may offer advantages in preserving peri-implant hard tissues and reducing postoperative complications. However, long-term studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm these findings.

临床和影像学评价皮瓣和无皮瓣植入手术后软硬组织改变:一项随机对照试验。
背景:种植体治疗的最新进展通过减少手术侵入性和提高临床效果改善了对全牙缺牙的治疗。传统的皮瓣技术,虽然提供了足够的通道,但与嵴骨丢失和软组织衰退等并发症有关。无皮瓣手术已成为一种微创替代方法,可保留骨膜完整性,减少创伤,促进更快的愈合和患者舒适度。目的:本研究的目的是比较使用皮瓣和无皮瓣植入术后软组织和硬组织的变化。材料和方法:本研究随机对照单盲研究包括30名参与者,15个种植体被分为皮瓣组(对照组)和无皮瓣组(试验组)。患者有适当的脊尺寸和良好的口腔健康。在基线和4个月时记录临床参数,包括角化粘膜宽度(KMW)和种植体周围探探深度。使用口腔内根尖周x线片进行放射学评估,在种植体放置后立即和4个月时评估冠骨水平。结果:两组KMW均显著降低,无瓣组降低幅度更大。在4个月时,无瓣组的嵴骨水平比有瓣组保存得更好。两组间种植体周围探查深度无统计学差异。结论:无瓣种植术在保留种植体周围硬组织和减少术后并发症方面具有优势。然而,需要更大样本量的长期研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology publishes original scientific articles to support practice , education and research in the dental specialty of periodontology and oral implantology. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology (JISP), is the official publication of the Society and is managed and brought out by the Editor of the society. The journal is published Bimonthly with special issues being brought out for specific occasions. The ISP had a bulletin as its publication for a large number of years and was enhanced as a Journal a few years ago
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书