Which vertebral levels provide practical HU-based assessment for osteoporosis screening? A comparative analysis from T1 to S2.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Ze Zhou, Yan-Xiang Hou, Xin-Yu Dong, Jia-Qi Wang, Lu-Ping Zhou, Yu Chen, Pei-Lin Jin, Hua-Qing Zhang, Chong-Yu Jia, Liang Kang, Hui-Ya Ma, Cai-Liang Shen, Ren-Jie Zhang
{"title":"Which vertebral levels provide practical HU-based assessment for osteoporosis screening? A comparative analysis from T1 to S2.","authors":"Ze Zhou, Yan-Xiang Hou, Xin-Yu Dong, Jia-Qi Wang, Lu-Ping Zhou, Yu Chen, Pei-Lin Jin, Hua-Qing Zhang, Chong-Yu Jia, Liang Kang, Hui-Ya Ma, Cai-Liang Shen, Ren-Jie Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s13018-026-06952-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify practical vertebral HU measurement strategies for opportunistic bone mineral density (BMD) screening using routine CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven anatomical segmental combinations were defined: upper thoracic (T1-T4, UT), mid-thoracic (T5-T8, MT), lower thoracic (T9-T12, LT), thoracolumbar (T11-L2, TL), upper lumbar (L1-L2, UL), lower lumbar (L3-L5, LL), and sacral (S1-S2, SA). Correlations between HU and DEXA-derived T-score were analyzed for both single vertebrae and multi-segment combinations, using the full-segment average (T1-S2, TS) as reference. Stepwise linear regression across 19 vertebrae generated an exploratory combination (EC) model. ROC analysis and age-sex subgroup analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 300 patients were enrolled (150 males, 150 females; mean age 54.94 ± 14.39 years). Both single- and multi-segment measurements correlated positively with T-score. TS showed the strongest correlation (r = 0.799) and highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.914). Among single vertebrae, T5 showed the strongest correlation (r = 0.785). Among anatomical combinations, TL showed one of the strongest correlations (r = 0.787) and favorable predictive performance (AUC = 0.912). Subgroup analyses showed stable TL performance across sex groups, whereas the strongest correlation and predictive performance were observed in the 51-60-year age subgroup.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both single- and multi-segment HU measurements were effective for BMD assessment. The TL segment represents a practical HU-based assessment approach for opportunistic osteoporosis screening on routine CT, with stable predictive performance and practical clinical value.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-06952-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify practical vertebral HU measurement strategies for opportunistic bone mineral density (BMD) screening using routine CT.

Methods: Seven anatomical segmental combinations were defined: upper thoracic (T1-T4, UT), mid-thoracic (T5-T8, MT), lower thoracic (T9-T12, LT), thoracolumbar (T11-L2, TL), upper lumbar (L1-L2, UL), lower lumbar (L3-L5, LL), and sacral (S1-S2, SA). Correlations between HU and DEXA-derived T-score were analyzed for both single vertebrae and multi-segment combinations, using the full-segment average (T1-S2, TS) as reference. Stepwise linear regression across 19 vertebrae generated an exploratory combination (EC) model. ROC analysis and age-sex subgroup analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 300 patients were enrolled (150 males, 150 females; mean age 54.94 ± 14.39 years). Both single- and multi-segment measurements correlated positively with T-score. TS showed the strongest correlation (r = 0.799) and highest predictive performance (AUC = 0.914). Among single vertebrae, T5 showed the strongest correlation (r = 0.785). Among anatomical combinations, TL showed one of the strongest correlations (r = 0.787) and favorable predictive performance (AUC = 0.912). Subgroup analyses showed stable TL performance across sex groups, whereas the strongest correlation and predictive performance were observed in the 51-60-year age subgroup.

Conclusion: Both single- and multi-segment HU measurements were effective for BMD assessment. The TL segment represents a practical HU-based assessment approach for opportunistic osteoporosis screening on routine CT, with stable predictive performance and practical clinical value.

在骨质疏松筛查中,哪个椎体水平提供了实用的基于hu的评估?T1到S2的对比分析。
目的:为常规CT筛查骨密度(BMD)确定实用的椎体HU测量策略。方法:确定了7个解剖节段组合:上胸(T1-T4, UT)、中胸(T5-T8, MT)、下胸(T9-T12, LT)、胸腰椎(T11-L2, TL)、上腰椎(L1-L2, UL)、下腰椎(L3-L5, LL)和骶骨(S1-S2, SA)。以全节段平均值(T1-S2, TS)为参考,分析单节段和多节段组合的HU和dexa衍生t评分之间的相关性。19个椎骨的逐步线性回归生成了探索性组合(EC)模型。进行ROC分析及年龄-性别亚组分析。结果:共纳入300例患者(男150例,女150例,平均年龄54.94±14.39岁)。单段和多段测量均与T-score呈正相关。TS相关性最强(r = 0.799),预测效能最高(AUC = 0.914)。在单个椎体中,T5相关性最强(r = 0.785)。在解剖组合中,TL相关性最强(r = 0.787),预测效果较好(AUC = 0.912)。亚组分析显示,不同性别的TL表现稳定,而在51-60岁的亚组中观察到最强的相关性和预测性表现。结论:单节段和多节段HU测量均可有效评估骨密度。TL段为常规CT机会性骨质疏松筛查提供了一种实用的基于hu的评估方法,具有稳定的预测性能和临床实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书