Evaluating the abuse liability of ketamine in the treatment of mood disorders: A systematic review.

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shreya Vasudeva, Gabrielle F M Lovell, Sabrina Wong, Gia Han Le, Diana K Orsini, Sara Di Luch, Roger S McIntyre, Joshua D Rosenblat
{"title":"Evaluating the abuse liability of ketamine in the treatment of mood disorders: A systematic review.","authors":"Shreya Vasudeva, Gabrielle F M Lovell, Sabrina Wong, Gia Han Le, Diana K Orsini, Sara Di Luch, Roger S McIntyre, Joshua D Rosenblat","doi":"10.1177/02698811261453814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ketamine has emerged as a promising rapid-acting treatment for mood disorders and suicidality. Notwithstanding its replicated antidepressant efficacy, ketamine-associated risk for abuse, dependence, and misuse remain. We conducted a systematic review of clinical and preclinical studies from database inception to August 2025, including randomized and observational trials, open-label extensions, case reports, and preclinical animal research, assessing ketamine or its enantiomers for outcomes related to abuse potential including craving, drug liking, tolerance, withdrawal, or dependence. A total of 30 studies (25 clinical and 5 preclinical) met the inclusion criteria. Clinical studies consistently reported minimal evidence of craving, dose escalation, misuse, or illicit use when ketamine or esketamine was administered in controlled, clinically supervised settings. Preclinical findings demonstrated that (S)-ketamine produces reward-related behaviors and locomotor sensitization, racemic ketamine shows reinforcing effects at higher doses, whereas (R)-ketamine demonstrates minimal reinforcing effects. Overall, the body of reviewed literature suggests that ketamine and esketamine carry low abuse liability when delivered in a monitored clinical setting while risk of abuse and misuse was identified largely in case reports and series in which appropriate monitoring was often not conducted. These findings support the safe incorporation of ketamine into treatment protocols for mood disorders while emphasizing the importance of structured administration and ongoing patient monitoring both throughout treatment and follow-up. Further research using longitudinal, prospective designs is warranted to assess potential misuse over extended treatment periods and across diverse patient populations, to optimize clinical safety and further inform evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"2698811261453814"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811261453814","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ketamine has emerged as a promising rapid-acting treatment for mood disorders and suicidality. Notwithstanding its replicated antidepressant efficacy, ketamine-associated risk for abuse, dependence, and misuse remain. We conducted a systematic review of clinical and preclinical studies from database inception to August 2025, including randomized and observational trials, open-label extensions, case reports, and preclinical animal research, assessing ketamine or its enantiomers for outcomes related to abuse potential including craving, drug liking, tolerance, withdrawal, or dependence. A total of 30 studies (25 clinical and 5 preclinical) met the inclusion criteria. Clinical studies consistently reported minimal evidence of craving, dose escalation, misuse, or illicit use when ketamine or esketamine was administered in controlled, clinically supervised settings. Preclinical findings demonstrated that (S)-ketamine produces reward-related behaviors and locomotor sensitization, racemic ketamine shows reinforcing effects at higher doses, whereas (R)-ketamine demonstrates minimal reinforcing effects. Overall, the body of reviewed literature suggests that ketamine and esketamine carry low abuse liability when delivered in a monitored clinical setting while risk of abuse and misuse was identified largely in case reports and series in which appropriate monitoring was often not conducted. These findings support the safe incorporation of ketamine into treatment protocols for mood disorders while emphasizing the importance of structured administration and ongoing patient monitoring both throughout treatment and follow-up. Further research using longitudinal, prospective designs is warranted to assess potential misuse over extended treatment periods and across diverse patient populations, to optimize clinical safety and further inform evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

评价氯胺酮在治疗情绪障碍中的滥用责任:一项系统综述。
氯胺酮已经成为治疗情绪障碍和自杀的一种很有前途的速效药物。尽管氯胺酮具有相同的抗抑郁疗效,但滥用、依赖和误用氯胺酮的相关风险仍然存在。我们对从数据库建立到2025年8月的临床和临床前研究进行了系统回顾,包括随机和观察性试验、开放标签扩展、病例报告和临床前动物研究,评估氯胺酮或其对映体与滥用可能性相关的结果,包括渴望、药物喜好、耐受性、戒断或依赖。共有30项研究(25项临床研究和5项临床前研究)符合纳入标准。临床研究一致报告,在对照的临床监督环境中给予氯胺酮或艾氯胺酮时,很少有渴望、剂量增加、滥用或非法使用的证据。临床前研究结果表明(S)-氯胺酮产生奖励相关行为和运动致敏,外消旋氯胺酮在高剂量下表现出强化作用,而(R)-氯胺酮表现出最小的强化作用。总体而言,经审查的文献表明,氯胺酮和艾氯胺酮在临床监测环境下提供时,滥用风险较低,而滥用和误用风险主要是在病例报告和系列报告中确定的,而这些报告和系列报告往往没有进行适当的监测。这些发现支持将氯胺酮安全纳入情绪障碍的治疗方案,同时强调了在整个治疗和随访过程中结构化给药和持续监测患者的重要性。有必要使用纵向、前瞻性设计进行进一步研究,以评估在延长治疗期间和不同患者群体中潜在的误用,以优化临床安全性,并进一步为循证临床实践指南提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书