Linking Risk Perceptions and Information Acquisition to Preventive Behaviors: An Application of the Extended Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction in Italy and the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Journal of Health Communication Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-23 DOI:10.1080/10810730.2026.2670328
Rain Wuyu Liu, Cheng Ying, Alice Fanari
{"title":"Linking Risk Perceptions and Information Acquisition to Preventive Behaviors: An Application of the Extended Integrative Model of Behavioral Prediction in Italy and the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Rain Wuyu Liu, Cheng Ying, Alice Fanari","doi":"10.1080/10810730.2026.2670328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, rapidly evolving health guidance and widespread misinformation posed unprecedented challenges for quality health communication. This study examines how individuals navigated this changing information environment by extending the integrative model of behavioral prediction (IMBP) to explore how risk perceptions and information acquisition relate to preventative behavioral intentions (mask-wearing and social distancing) via cognitive beliefs (attitudes, perceived norms, self-efficacy) across the U.S. (<i>n</i> = 333) and Italy (<i>n</i> = 331). In Italy, risk perceptions predicted intentions through information seeking and specific IMBP constructs: attitudes for social distancing, and injunctive norms plus self-efficacy for mask-wearing. No such serial mediation emerged in the U.S. and information scanning did not create mediation pathways in either country. Direct associations revealed that information seeking related to IMBP constructs in both countries, while information scanning showed associations only in the U.S. Attitudes, injunctive norms, and self-efficacy consistently predicted intentions across both countries and behaviors, whereas descriptive norms predicted only Americans' mask-wearing intentions. These findings highlight how cultural and structural factors shape information processing pathways during health crises, with implications for culturally tailored public health communication strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Communication","volume":"31 4","pages":"170-182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2026.2670328","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, rapidly evolving health guidance and widespread misinformation posed unprecedented challenges for quality health communication. This study examines how individuals navigated this changing information environment by extending the integrative model of behavioral prediction (IMBP) to explore how risk perceptions and information acquisition relate to preventative behavioral intentions (mask-wearing and social distancing) via cognitive beliefs (attitudes, perceived norms, self-efficacy) across the U.S. (n = 333) and Italy (n = 331). In Italy, risk perceptions predicted intentions through information seeking and specific IMBP constructs: attitudes for social distancing, and injunctive norms plus self-efficacy for mask-wearing. No such serial mediation emerged in the U.S. and information scanning did not create mediation pathways in either country. Direct associations revealed that information seeking related to IMBP constructs in both countries, while information scanning showed associations only in the U.S. Attitudes, injunctive norms, and self-efficacy consistently predicted intentions across both countries and behaviors, whereas descriptive norms predicted only Americans' mask-wearing intentions. These findings highlight how cultural and structural factors shape information processing pathways during health crises, with implications for culturally tailored public health communication strategies.

将风险认知和信息获取与预防行为联系起来:新冠肺炎大流行期间行为预测扩展综合模型在意大利和美国的应用
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,快速变化的卫生指导和广泛存在的错误信息给高质量的卫生传播带来了前所未有的挑战。本研究通过扩展行为预测综合模型(IMBP)来探讨美国(n = 333)和意大利(n = 331)的风险感知和信息获取如何通过认知信念(态度、感知规范、自我效能感)与预防行为意图(戴口罩和保持社会距离)相关,从而研究个体如何驾驭这种不断变化的信息环境。在意大利,风险感知通过信息寻求和特定的IMBP结构来预测意图:对社会距离的态度,以及对戴口罩的禁令规范和自我效能感。在美国没有出现这样的连续中介,信息扫描在这两个国家都没有创建中介路径。直接关联揭示了两国的信息寻求与IMBP结构相关,而信息扫描仅在美国显示了关联。态度、禁令规范和自我效能一致地预测了两国的意图和行为,而描述性规范仅预测了美国人戴面具的意图。这些发现突出了文化和结构因素如何影响健康危机期间的信息处理途径,对文化上适合的公共卫生传播策略具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives is the leading journal covering the full breadth of a field that focuses on the communication of health information globally. Articles feature research on: • Developments in the field of health communication; • New media, m-health and interactive health communication; • Health Literacy; • Social marketing; • Global Health; • Shared decision making and ethics; • Interpersonal and mass media communication; • Advances in health diplomacy, psychology, government, policy and education; • Government, civil society and multi-stakeholder initiatives; • Public Private partnerships and • Public Health campaigns. Global in scope, the journal seeks to advance a synergistic relationship between research and practical information. With a focus on promoting the health literacy of the individual, caregiver, provider, community, and those in the health policy, the journal presents research, progress in areas of technology and public health, ethics, politics and policy, and the application of health communication principles. The journal is selective with the highest quality social scientific research including qualitative and quantitative studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书