Joyce Rops, Naomi Buntsma, Aleksandra Gąsecka, Leonie de Rond, Anne Yaël Nossent, Nyika D Kruyt, Rienk Nieuwland, Edwin van der Pol
{"title":"The Dilution Paradox in Extracellular Vesicle Flow Cytometry.","authors":"Joyce Rops, Naomi Buntsma, Aleksandra Gąsecka, Leonie de Rond, Anne Yaël Nossent, Nyika D Kruyt, Rienk Nieuwland, Edwin van der Pol","doi":"10.1002/jev2.70312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concentrations of extracellular vesicles (EVs) can be measured by flow cytometry, which detects fluorescence and light scattering signals from single particles. To ensure single particle detection, plasma samples are diluted based on their particle concentration, which can differ 100-fold between samples. Here we studied how sample dilution affects EV detection by flow cytometry. EVs were measured in human plasma (i) with different concentrations of spiked-in purified lipoproteins, (ii) at different dilutions, and (iii) using either scatter-triggering or fluorescence-triggering. In addition, the reliability of two published clinical EV studies was evaluated using an analytical model. Our results show that the minimum dilution factor to prevent swarm detection by the light scattering detector can exceed the maximum dilution factor that ensures labelled EVs outnumber fluorescent background events. This 'dilution paradox' precludes reliable detection of both fluorescence and light scattering signals of EVs for some samples. In the two clinical studies, 30% and 65% of the measurements were unreliable, depending on the label used. Therefore, results from previous studies should be re-evaluated. The dilution paradox might be overcome by using fluorescence-triggering at a fixed sample dilution, removing non-EV particles from the sample, removing fluorescent particulates from staining reagents, and setting stricter inclusion criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":15811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Extracellular Vesicles","volume":"15 6","pages":"e70312"},"PeriodicalIF":21.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13291209/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Extracellular Vesicles","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jev2.70312","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Concentrations of extracellular vesicles (EVs) can be measured by flow cytometry, which detects fluorescence and light scattering signals from single particles. To ensure single particle detection, plasma samples are diluted based on their particle concentration, which can differ 100-fold between samples. Here we studied how sample dilution affects EV detection by flow cytometry. EVs were measured in human plasma (i) with different concentrations of spiked-in purified lipoproteins, (ii) at different dilutions, and (iii) using either scatter-triggering or fluorescence-triggering. In addition, the reliability of two published clinical EV studies was evaluated using an analytical model. Our results show that the minimum dilution factor to prevent swarm detection by the light scattering detector can exceed the maximum dilution factor that ensures labelled EVs outnumber fluorescent background events. This 'dilution paradox' precludes reliable detection of both fluorescence and light scattering signals of EVs for some samples. In the two clinical studies, 30% and 65% of the measurements were unreliable, depending on the label used. Therefore, results from previous studies should be re-evaluated. The dilution paradox might be overcome by using fluorescence-triggering at a fixed sample dilution, removing non-EV particles from the sample, removing fluorescent particulates from staining reagents, and setting stricter inclusion criteria.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Extracellular Vesicles is an open access research publication that focuses on extracellular vesicles, including microvesicles, exosomes, ectosomes, and apoptotic bodies. It serves as the official journal of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and aims to facilitate the exchange of data, ideas, and information pertaining to the chemistry, biology, and applications of extracellular vesicles. The journal covers various aspects such as the cellular and molecular mechanisms of extracellular vesicles biogenesis, technological advancements in their isolation, quantification, and characterization, the role and function of extracellular vesicles in biology, stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles and their biology, as well as the application of extracellular vesicles for pharmacological, immunological, or genetic therapies.
The Journal of Extracellular Vesicles is widely recognized and indexed by numerous services, including Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Current Contents/Life Sciences, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, Google Scholar, ProQuest Natural Science Collection, ProQuest SciTech Collection, SciTech Premium Collection, PubMed Central/PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, ScienceOpen, and Scopus.