Efficacy of injectable platelet-rich fibrin and cross-linked hyaluronic acid for augmentation of interdental papilla in terms of true and surrogate end points.

Q2 Dentistry
Bhavisha Patel, Pratebha Balu, Saravana Kumar Ravindran, Jananni Muthu, Narayane Ramkumar, Sakthi Devi Sathiyaseelan
{"title":"Efficacy of injectable platelet-rich fibrin and cross-linked hyaluronic acid for augmentation of interdental papilla in terms of true and surrogate end points.","authors":"Bhavisha Patel, Pratebha Balu, Saravana Kumar Ravindran, Jananni Muthu, Narayane Ramkumar, Sakthi Devi Sathiyaseelan","doi":"10.4103/jisp.jisp_195_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tissue volumizers such as injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and hyaluronic acid (HA) have been used for nonsurgical augmentation of interdental papilla. There is sparse literature comparing the efficacy of the two tissue volumizers in terms of attainment of true endpoints. The present study compared the efficacy of i-PRF and cross-linked HA in interdental papilla augmentation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty participants were allocated into Group I (i-PRF) and Group II (HA). Assessment of surrogate end points was done using Papilla Presence Index (PPI), black triangle area (BTA) (Image J Analysis), probing pocket depth, and clinical attachment level, at baseline, 3<sup>rd</sup> month, and 6<sup>th</sup> month. PPI and BTA were assessed at 21<sup>st</sup> day also. True endpoints were checked using the visual analog scale (VAS) and patient satisfaction questionnaire at the 6<sup>th</sup> month. Data were analyzed using repeated measures of ANOVA and an independent <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant reduction in mean BTA measured at 21 days and at the 3<sup>rd</sup> month (<i>P</i> = 0.001) within the groups. However, between the groups, there was no statistically significant difference in mean BTA. Improvement in PPI scores from score 3 to score 1 in both groups was observed. The VAS score was marginally high in Group II, and patient satisfaction was relatively high in Group I.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>i-PRF and HA are equally effective as tissue volumizers in the augmentation of interdental papilla in terms of reduction in BTA and papillary fill. Patient satisfaction favored i-PRF use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","volume":"30 1","pages":"123-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13286587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_195_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tissue volumizers such as injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and hyaluronic acid (HA) have been used for nonsurgical augmentation of interdental papilla. There is sparse literature comparing the efficacy of the two tissue volumizers in terms of attainment of true endpoints. The present study compared the efficacy of i-PRF and cross-linked HA in interdental papilla augmentation.

Materials and methods: Thirty participants were allocated into Group I (i-PRF) and Group II (HA). Assessment of surrogate end points was done using Papilla Presence Index (PPI), black triangle area (BTA) (Image J Analysis), probing pocket depth, and clinical attachment level, at baseline, 3rd month, and 6th month. PPI and BTA were assessed at 21st day also. True endpoints were checked using the visual analog scale (VAS) and patient satisfaction questionnaire at the 6th month. Data were analyzed using repeated measures of ANOVA and an independent t-test.

Results: There was a significant reduction in mean BTA measured at 21 days and at the 3rd month (P = 0.001) within the groups. However, between the groups, there was no statistically significant difference in mean BTA. Improvement in PPI scores from score 3 to score 1 in both groups was observed. The VAS score was marginally high in Group II, and patient satisfaction was relatively high in Group I.

Conclusion: i-PRF and HA are equally effective as tissue volumizers in the augmentation of interdental papilla in terms of reduction in BTA and papillary fill. Patient satisfaction favored i-PRF use.

注射富血小板纤维蛋白和交联透明质酸增强牙间乳头的真实终点和替代终点的疗效。
背景:组织增容剂如可注射富血小板纤维蛋白(i-PRF)和透明质酸(HA)已被用于非手术的牙间乳头增大。很少有文献比较两种组织增容剂在达到真正终点方面的功效。本研究比较了i-PRF和交联HA在牙间乳头隆乳中的效果。材料与方法:将30例受试者分为I组(I - prf)和II组(HA)。在基线、第3个月和第6个月,使用乳头存在指数(PPI)、黑三角面积(BTA)(图像J分析)、探针袋深度和临床附着水平来评估替代终点。第21天同时评估PPI和BTA。6个月时采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和患者满意度问卷检查真实终点。数据分析采用重复方差分析和独立t检验。结果:两组患者在治疗第21天和第3个月的平均BTA显著降低(P = 0.001)。但两组间平均BTA差异无统计学意义。观察到两组患者PPI评分均从3分改善至1分。II组VAS评分略高,i组患者满意度相对较高。结论:在减少BTA和乳头填充方面,i-PRF和HA作为组织体积剂在增加牙间乳头方面同样有效。患者满意度倾向于使用i-PRF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology publishes original scientific articles to support practice , education and research in the dental specialty of periodontology and oral implantology. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology (JISP), is the official publication of the Society and is managed and brought out by the Editor of the society. The journal is published Bimonthly with special issues being brought out for specific occasions. The ISP had a bulletin as its publication for a large number of years and was enhanced as a Journal a few years ago
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书