Spathodea campanulata extract as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro and ex vivo study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jorge Miguel Santacruz-Monzon, Rubén Abraham Domínguez-Pérez, Bertha Fenton-Navarro
{"title":"Spathodea campanulata extract as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro and ex vivo study.","authors":"Jorge Miguel Santacruz-Monzon, Rubén Abraham Domínguez-Pérez, Bertha Fenton-Navarro","doi":"10.1186/s13005-026-00639-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the antibacterial activity of leaf extracts derived from Spathodea campanulata as an endodontic irrigant in both in vitro and ex vivo models against Enterococcus faecalis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Aqueous (AQESC), methanolic (MESC), ethanolic (EESC), acetonic (AESC), chloroformic (CESC), and hexanic (HESC) extracts derived from Spathodea campanulata were prepared. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) were determined. A well diffusion assay was employed to compare these extracts against Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29,212. Human single-rooted teeth were collected, standardized, and inoculated to facilitate the development of a four-week biofilm. These teeth were subsequently divided into three experimental groups, each receiving positive pressure irrigation with 1 mL of one of the following solutions: phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and the extract from Spathodea campanulata exhibiting the most favorable MIC, MBC, and inhibition halo in prior tests. Biofilm samples were harvested from the root canals to quantify colony-forming units (CFU). Moreover, the extracts were analyzed for their total flavonoid, phenol, polyphenol, and tannin contents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AQESC lacked MIC and MBC values, whereas the other extracts demonstrated MIC and MBC values within the range of 12.5 to 50 µg/mL. AQESC, MESC, CESC, and HESC did not produce an inhibition halo at a concentration of 800 mg/mL. Conversely, EESC and AESC at this concentration exhibited bactericidal activity, with no statistically significant difference between them, when compared to 2.5% NaOCl. EESC at 800 mg/mL displayed the most superior antibacterial properties; consequently, this concentration was utilized in the ex vivo model. The analysis of CFU/mL revealed a significant reduction in the EESC group compared to 2.5% NaOCl (P < 0.0001). The extracts are abundant in flavonoids, phenols, polyphenols, and tannins, which may account for the observed results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The extracts of Spathodea campanulata exhibit bacteriostatic and bactericidal properties at low concentrations, with the exception of AQESC. The inhibition halo against Enterococcus faecalis at 800 mg/mL of EESC and AESC is comparable to that produced by 2.5% NaOCl. Moreover, endodontic irrigation using 800 mg/mL of EESC significantly decreases the CFU of Enterococcus faecalis compared to 2.5% NaOCl.</p>","PeriodicalId":12994,"journal":{"name":"Head & Face Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548585/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Face Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-026-00639-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the antibacterial activity of leaf extracts derived from Spathodea campanulata as an endodontic irrigant in both in vitro and ex vivo models against Enterococcus faecalis.

Materials and methods: Aqueous (AQESC), methanolic (MESC), ethanolic (EESC), acetonic (AESC), chloroformic (CESC), and hexanic (HESC) extracts derived from Spathodea campanulata were prepared. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) were determined. A well diffusion assay was employed to compare these extracts against Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29,212. Human single-rooted teeth were collected, standardized, and inoculated to facilitate the development of a four-week biofilm. These teeth were subsequently divided into three experimental groups, each receiving positive pressure irrigation with 1 mL of one of the following solutions: phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and the extract from Spathodea campanulata exhibiting the most favorable MIC, MBC, and inhibition halo in prior tests. Biofilm samples were harvested from the root canals to quantify colony-forming units (CFU). Moreover, the extracts were analyzed for their total flavonoid, phenol, polyphenol, and tannin contents.

Results: AQESC lacked MIC and MBC values, whereas the other extracts demonstrated MIC and MBC values within the range of 12.5 to 50 µg/mL. AQESC, MESC, CESC, and HESC did not produce an inhibition halo at a concentration of 800 mg/mL. Conversely, EESC and AESC at this concentration exhibited bactericidal activity, with no statistically significant difference between them, when compared to 2.5% NaOCl. EESC at 800 mg/mL displayed the most superior antibacterial properties; consequently, this concentration was utilized in the ex vivo model. The analysis of CFU/mL revealed a significant reduction in the EESC group compared to 2.5% NaOCl (P < 0.0001). The extracts are abundant in flavonoids, phenols, polyphenols, and tannins, which may account for the observed results.

Conclusion: The extracts of Spathodea campanulata exhibit bacteriostatic and bactericidal properties at low concentrations, with the exception of AQESC. The inhibition halo against Enterococcus faecalis at 800 mg/mL of EESC and AESC is comparable to that produced by 2.5% NaOCl. Moreover, endodontic irrigation using 800 mg/mL of EESC significantly decreases the CFU of Enterococcus faecalis compared to 2.5% NaOCl.

鸡血藤提取物对粪肠球菌的牙髓冲洗作用:体外和离体研究。
背景:在离体和离体实验中,评价钟齿鸡翅叶提取物作为牙髓冲洗剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性。材料与方法:制备了鸡血藤的水(AQESC)、甲醇(MESC)、乙醇(EESC)、丙酮(AESC)、氯甲酸(CESC)和己酸(HESC)提取物。测定了最小抑菌浓度(MIC)和最小杀菌浓度(MBC)。采用孔扩散法比较这些提取物对粪肠球菌ATCC 29,212的抑制作用。收集人类单根牙齿,标准化并接种,以促进四周生物膜的发育。这些牙齿随后被分成三个实验组,每个实验组接受1 mL的正压冲洗,其中一种溶液:磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS), 2.5%次氯酸钠(NaOCl),以及在先前的测试中表现出最有利的MIC, MBC和抑制晕的钟齿草提取物。从根管中收集生物膜样本以量化菌落形成单位(CFU)。并对提取物的总黄酮、酚、多酚和单宁含量进行了分析。结果:AQESC没有MIC和MBC值,而其他提取物的MIC和MBC值在12.5 ~ 50µg/mL范围内。AQESC、MESC、CESC和HESC在浓度为800 mg/mL时不产生抑制晕。相反,与2.5% NaOCl相比,该浓度的EESC和AESC表现出杀菌活性,两者之间无统计学差异。EESC在800 mg/mL时抗菌性能最优;因此,该浓度用于离体模型。CFU/mL分析结果显示,与2.5% NaOCl相比,EESC组CFU/mL显著降低(P)。结论:除AQESC外,钟形鸡血藤提取物在低浓度下均具有抑菌和杀菌作用。800 mg/mL EESC和AESC对粪肠球菌的抑制晕与2.5% NaOCl产生的抑制晕相当。此外,与2.5% NaOCl相比,使用800 mg/mL EESC进行根管冲洗可显著降低粪肠球菌的CFU。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Head & Face Medicine
Head & Face Medicine DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Head & Face Medicine is a multidisciplinary open access journal that publishes basic and clinical research concerning all aspects of cranial, facial and oral conditions. The journal covers all aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. It has been designed as a multidisciplinary journal for clinicians and researchers involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of diseases which affect the human head and face. The journal is wide-ranging, covering the development, aetiology, epidemiology and therapy of head and face diseases to the basic science that underlies these diseases. Management of head and face diseases includes all aspects of surgical and non-surgical treatments including psychopharmacological therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书