Assessment of Radiation Dose and Protection Practices in Neonatal Radiography in NICUs.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Nada Alomairy, Renad Ageely, Nuha Alsharif, Safiah Haddadi, Rimas Sahili, Badriah Sharahili, Tahani Aqrabi, Mohammad Alhaj
{"title":"Assessment of Radiation Dose and Protection Practices in Neonatal Radiography in NICUs.","authors":"Nada Alomairy, Renad Ageely, Nuha Alsharif, Safiah Haddadi, Rimas Sahili, Badriah Sharahili, Tahani Aqrabi, Mohammad Alhaj","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000002166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neonatal radiography is essential in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) for diagnosing and monitoring critical conditions. However, the use of ionizing radiation in fragile neonates - particularly in repeated chest and abdominal x rays - raises concerns about cumulative radiation exposure and its potential long-term health effects. This study aimed to quantitatively assess the entrance surface dose (ESD) received by neonates during chest and abdominal radiography in two NICUs in Saudi Arabia and to compare with the international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). A prospective, quantitative study of 100 neonates (50 in each hospital) on clinically justified chest and abdominal radiographs with mobile digital x-ray units was conducted. ESD was estimated from technical exposure parameters [tube voltage (kVp), milliampere-seconds (mAs), and focus-to-skin distance (FSD)] using the NRPB-recommended method. Correlation analyses and multiple linear regression were conducted to find the dose variation predictors. The average ESD was 0.48 ± 0.18 mGy in Hospital A and 0.49 ± 0.08 mGy in Hospital B with no statistically significant difference between the two hospitals. These results are well over ~5-10 times the international neonatal DRLs. ESD was significantly correlated with mAs (r=0.67) and patient thickness (r=0.76), and with kVp (r=0.54) in a moderate level of association; however, kVp and mAs were only weakly correlated (r=0.11). Regression analysis showed that patient thickness, mAs, and kVp were significant independent predictors of ESD (adjusted R2 = 0.65, p < 0.001). Neonatal radiation doses were found to be significantly elevated compared with the international reference levels, highlighting the need for immediate optimization. Dose reduction techniques like protocol standardization, elevated kVp at low mAs setting, beam collimation, and filtration must be used. These findings provide baseline data for establishing regional neonatal DRLs in Saudi Arabia and support future optimization studies using anthropomorphic phantoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000002166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neonatal radiography is essential in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) for diagnosing and monitoring critical conditions. However, the use of ionizing radiation in fragile neonates - particularly in repeated chest and abdominal x rays - raises concerns about cumulative radiation exposure and its potential long-term health effects. This study aimed to quantitatively assess the entrance surface dose (ESD) received by neonates during chest and abdominal radiography in two NICUs in Saudi Arabia and to compare with the international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). A prospective, quantitative study of 100 neonates (50 in each hospital) on clinically justified chest and abdominal radiographs with mobile digital x-ray units was conducted. ESD was estimated from technical exposure parameters [tube voltage (kVp), milliampere-seconds (mAs), and focus-to-skin distance (FSD)] using the NRPB-recommended method. Correlation analyses and multiple linear regression were conducted to find the dose variation predictors. The average ESD was 0.48 ± 0.18 mGy in Hospital A and 0.49 ± 0.08 mGy in Hospital B with no statistically significant difference between the two hospitals. These results are well over ~5-10 times the international neonatal DRLs. ESD was significantly correlated with mAs (r=0.67) and patient thickness (r=0.76), and with kVp (r=0.54) in a moderate level of association; however, kVp and mAs were only weakly correlated (r=0.11). Regression analysis showed that patient thickness, mAs, and kVp were significant independent predictors of ESD (adjusted R2 = 0.65, p < 0.001). Neonatal radiation doses were found to be significantly elevated compared with the international reference levels, highlighting the need for immediate optimization. Dose reduction techniques like protocol standardization, elevated kVp at low mAs setting, beam collimation, and filtration must be used. These findings provide baseline data for establishing regional neonatal DRLs in Saudi Arabia and support future optimization studies using anthropomorphic phantoms.

新生儿重症监护病房放射照相术中辐射剂量评估及防护措施。
新生儿x线摄影在新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)诊断和监测危急情况是必不可少的。然而,在脆弱的新生儿中使用电离辐射,特别是反复进行胸部和腹部x射线照射,引起了对累积辐射暴露及其潜在长期健康影响的关注。本研究旨在定量评估沙特阿拉伯两家新生儿重症监护病房(nicu)新生儿在胸部和腹部x线摄影时接受的入口表面剂量(ESD),并与国际诊断参考水平(DRLs)进行比较。对100名新生儿(每家医院50名)进行了前瞻性定量研究,这些新生儿使用移动数字x线机进行了临床证明的胸部和腹部x线片。使用nrpb推荐的方法,根据技术暴露参数[管电压(kVp)、毫安秒(mAs)和焦点到皮肤距离(FSD)]估计ESD。通过相关分析和多元线性回归寻找剂量变化的预测因子。A医院的平均ESD为0.48±0.18 mGy, B医院的平均ESD为0.49±0.08 mGy,两医院间差异无统计学意义。这些结果远远超过国际新生儿drl的5-10倍。ESD与mAs (r=0.67)、患者厚度(r=0.76)显著相关,与kVp (r=0.54)中度相关;而kVp与mAs仅呈弱相关(r=0.11)。回归分析显示,患者厚度、mAs和kVp是ESD的显著独立预测因子(校正R2 = 0.65, p < 0.001)。与国际参考水平相比,发现新生儿辐射剂量显著升高,突出表明需要立即优化。必须使用方案标准化、在低mAs设置下提高kVp、光束准直和过滤等剂量降低技术。这些发现为在沙特阿拉伯建立区域性新生儿drl提供了基线数据,并支持未来使用拟人化幽灵的优化研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书