European simulation-based education and training in anaesthesiology and intensive care: evidence, value and inevitable evolution.

IF 7.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-23 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002448
Crina L Burlacu, Yitzhak Brzezinski Sinai, Gustavo Norte, Clément Buléon, Petr Štourač, Georges L Savoldelli, Joana Berger-Estilita, Anne Marie Camilleri Podesta, Doris Østergaard
{"title":"European simulation-based education and training in anaesthesiology and intensive care: evidence, value and inevitable evolution.","authors":"Crina L Burlacu, Yitzhak Brzezinski Sinai, Gustavo Norte, Clément Buléon, Petr Štourač, Georges L Savoldelli, Joana Berger-Estilita, Anne Marie Camilleri Podesta, Doris Østergaard","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anaesthesiologists, intensive care, and perioperative physicians work within multidisciplinary teams in high-risk environments where adverse events may threaten patient safety and are often avoidable. They face converging challenges, including multimorbidity and increasing clinical complexity, workforce shortages and burnout, technological evolution, and rising expectations for safety, equity, and sustainability. In this expert-driven evidence-based consensus review, we aim to demonstrate that simulation-based education and training (SBET) is uniquely positioned to address these challenges. We review how SBET adds value across the professional lifespan, from initial training to high-stakes examinations and continuing professional development. We further examine how SBET enhances team performance, identifies latent system threats, and supports organisational redesign through translational simulation. We examine how SBET can prepare for the future by fostering digital and ecological competencies. We explore key barriers to implementation, as despite SBET's value, its adoption across anaesthesiology, intensive care, and perioperative medicine remains fragmented, with limited interprofessional integration and few national frameworks. Above all, we advocate for coordinated value-based adoption of SBET across education and healthcare systems, recognising it not merely as an educational method but as a strategic infrastructure for high-reliability healthcare systems. Sustained investment, protected time, faculty development, and interprofessional integration are essential to realise its full potential. Aligned strategies to close the gap between evidence and practice are crucial. Without decisive and collective action, education and healthcare risk losing one of the most effective tools for improving patient safety, enhancing individual and system resilience, and maintaining the highest standards of excellence across our specialty and interprofessional practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"749-761"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002448","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anaesthesiologists, intensive care, and perioperative physicians work within multidisciplinary teams in high-risk environments where adverse events may threaten patient safety and are often avoidable. They face converging challenges, including multimorbidity and increasing clinical complexity, workforce shortages and burnout, technological evolution, and rising expectations for safety, equity, and sustainability. In this expert-driven evidence-based consensus review, we aim to demonstrate that simulation-based education and training (SBET) is uniquely positioned to address these challenges. We review how SBET adds value across the professional lifespan, from initial training to high-stakes examinations and continuing professional development. We further examine how SBET enhances team performance, identifies latent system threats, and supports organisational redesign through translational simulation. We examine how SBET can prepare for the future by fostering digital and ecological competencies. We explore key barriers to implementation, as despite SBET's value, its adoption across anaesthesiology, intensive care, and perioperative medicine remains fragmented, with limited interprofessional integration and few national frameworks. Above all, we advocate for coordinated value-based adoption of SBET across education and healthcare systems, recognising it not merely as an educational method but as a strategic infrastructure for high-reliability healthcare systems. Sustained investment, protected time, faculty development, and interprofessional integration are essential to realise its full potential. Aligned strategies to close the gap between evidence and practice are crucial. Without decisive and collective action, education and healthcare risk losing one of the most effective tools for improving patient safety, enhancing individual and system resilience, and maintaining the highest standards of excellence across our specialty and interprofessional practice.

欧洲麻醉学和重症监护模拟教育和培训:证据、价值和不可避免的演变。
麻醉医师、重症监护医师和围手术期医师在高风险环境中的多学科团队中工作,在这些环境中,不良事件可能威胁患者的安全,而且通常是可以避免的。他们面临着各种挑战,包括多种疾病和日益增加的临床复杂性、劳动力短缺和倦怠、技术发展以及对安全、公平和可持续性的期望不断提高。在这个专家驱动的基于证据的共识审查中,我们的目标是证明基于模拟的教育和培训(SBET)在应对这些挑战方面具有独特的优势。我们回顾了SBET如何在整个职业生涯中增加价值,从最初的培训到高风险考试和持续的专业发展。我们进一步研究了SBET如何提高团队绩效,识别潜在的系统威胁,并通过转化模拟支持组织重新设计。我们研究了SBET如何通过培养数字和生态能力为未来做好准备。我们探讨了实施SBET的主要障碍,因为尽管SBET具有价值,但其在麻醉学、重症监护和围手术期医学中的采用仍然分散,跨专业整合有限,国家框架很少。最重要的是,我们提倡在教育和医疗保健系统中协调采用基于价值的SBET,认识到它不仅是一种教育方法,而且是高可靠性医疗保健系统的战略基础设施。持续的投资、时间保护、教师发展和跨专业整合对于充分发挥其潜力至关重要。协调一致的战略以缩小证据与实践之间的差距至关重要。如果没有果断的集体行动,教育和医疗保健就有可能失去改善患者安全、增强个人和系统弹性以及在我们的专业和跨专业实践中保持最高卓越标准的最有效工具之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书