A novel hypothesis for stroke prediction, introducing CHA2DS2-VAScF.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-24 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2026.2692164
Ahmed B Shamsulddin
{"title":"A novel hypothesis for stroke prediction, introducing CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VAScF.","authors":"Ahmed B Shamsulddin","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2026.2692164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preventing strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most critical daily tasks facing clinicians in cardiovascular medicine. Yet, our primary tool-the CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score-frequently misses the mark because it completely ignores heritable risk. While we have landmark evidence showing that a family history of stroke is a powerful, independent risk factor, we still lack a practical way to use this information in daily practice. This gap between evidence and daily practice leaves vulnerable patients unprotected. In this commentary, we hypothesize: the CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VAScF score, which adds a single point for a positive family history of thrombotic events (ischemic stroke, heart attack, or blood clots). By translating established genetic risk into a practical bedside tool, CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VAScF can help us identify high-risk patients who currently slip through the cracks-especially those with \"borderline\" scores who might otherwise be denied life-saving therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"873-877"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2026.2692164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preventing strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most critical daily tasks facing clinicians in cardiovascular medicine. Yet, our primary tool-the CHA2DS2-VASc score-frequently misses the mark because it completely ignores heritable risk. While we have landmark evidence showing that a family history of stroke is a powerful, independent risk factor, we still lack a practical way to use this information in daily practice. This gap between evidence and daily practice leaves vulnerable patients unprotected. In this commentary, we hypothesize: the CHA2DS2-VAScF score, which adds a single point for a positive family history of thrombotic events (ischemic stroke, heart attack, or blood clots). By translating established genetic risk into a practical bedside tool, CHA2DS2-VAScF can help us identify high-risk patients who currently slip through the cracks-especially those with "borderline" scores who might otherwise be denied life-saving therapy.

引入CHA2DS2-VAScF的脑卒中预测新假设。
预防房颤(AF)患者卒中是心血管医学临床医生面临的最关键的日常任务之一。然而,我们的主要工具——CHA2DS2-VASc评分——由于完全忽略了遗传风险,经常无法达到目标。虽然我们有里程碑式的证据表明,中风家族史是一个强大的、独立的风险因素,但我们仍然缺乏在日常实践中使用这些信息的实用方法。这种证据与日常实践之间的差距使脆弱的患者得不到保护。在这篇评论中,我们假设:CHA2DS2-VAScF评分,它为血栓事件(缺血性中风、心脏病发作或血栓)的阳性家族史增加了一分。通过将已确定的遗传风险转化为一种实用的床边工具,CHA2DS2-VAScF可以帮助我们识别目前溜过裂缝的高风险患者,特别是那些得分“边缘”的患者,否则他们可能会被拒绝接受挽救生命的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书